Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
It's not you, it's me. |
I think it's very misguided to equate legal weed with homelessness and vagrancy. As was previously stated, it's most likely due to the liberal social policies in each particular town or state. Buying weed is not cheap, legal or not. I don't know where these vagrants are getting the money to buy it. I think some of you guys are also confusing the effects of weed with heroin...not even close. Besides, weed as always been easy to get through other means. If those bums want to get high, they can buy a gallon of cheap whiskey or some Nyquil from the local store for a few dollars. | |||
|
Frangas non Flectes |
As I said, where I worked in Tacoma, weed was very available. What I kept seeing was syringe caps on the sidewalks if it wasn't the syringe itself, discarded sandwich baggie corners and balloons, gargantuan piles of shit from coming down after weeks of having their guts shut down. That ain't weed. ______________________________________________ “There are plenty of good reasons for fighting, but no good reason ever to hate without reservation, to imagine that God Almighty Himself hates with you, too.” | |||
|
Shit don't mean shit |
I would disagree with this statement. Legalized weed has definitely brought the prices down. I know someone who works a white collar job in IT and smokes pot all the time. He tells me what he pays "on sale" at some of the dispensaries. It's way cheaper now than when I was in college, 93 - 97 time frame. I go to a few concerts at Red Rocks every year. Went to see Brit Floyd 2 weeks ago. You'd be surprised by the number of people smoking weed. The folks at the concerts are not bums by any means. Tickets were $70 each, and that was one of the cheaper concerts. I am going to see Imagine Dragons at RR in a few weeks, tickets were $125+ each (all fees, etc...) I bet 1/3 - 1/2 of the folks there will be lighting up. | |||
|
Big Stack |
I don't think that even if the Republicans supported Marijuana legalization, it would get them any votes. It's my observation that people with specific traits tend to have specific political leanings. People who are into Pot tend to lean left. So even if the Republicans give them what they want on pot, they still won't vote Republican based on other issues (economics, other criminal justice issue, guns, education, etc.). There may be good functional reasons for the Republicans to support Marijuana legalization, but I don't think it will flip many voters to their side. In point of fact, it could be a net loser for them. | |||
|
Lead slingin' Parrot Head |
This story was fairly widely reported and garnered a lot of local attention and debate. There are other story links that include more detail but require me to disable my ad blockers and my virus protection just expired so I'll just offer this link. Ultimately the husband confessed to the murder and was sentenced to 30 years. Police found evidence of edible marijuana purchase and use and the husband blamed the murder on his misuse of the edible. https://kdvr.com/2014/08/26/fa...bout-loss-moving-on/ Teen jumps to his death after eating a marijuana cookie. https://www.livescience.com/51...marijuana-death.html And to be clear here, I'm not suggesting that the legalization of marijuana in Colorado is the sole factor in the increase of the local homeless population. Granted it is a complicated issue with several contributing factors. However, and I realize this is anecdotal, there is no missing the correlation between the timing of the jump in homeless population and the legalization of marijuana. I've seen several interviews and read stories in which pot smokers outside the state, with no jobs and no money, admitted to moving to Colorado specifically because pot was legalized. Some hoped to get jobs in the pot industry (I'm certain some did), and some simply came so they could smoke pot with less hassle to suit their lifestyle. | |||
|
Still finding my way |
Replace "pot" with "firearms" and see how you feel. So one person owning something you don't agree with is grounds for the gov to step in a ban it? Some of y'all have a lot of soul searching to do if you even care about being honest. | |||
|
Member |
One reason people in the states that legalized first see an increase in undesirable/homeless citizens is an influx concentration of vagabonds from nonlegal states. Also if one holds strong opinions, answers which align with that belief are easier to see. E.g. Trump Derangement Syndrome. Seldom are things all peaches and cream. Rhubarb, gooseberry, oh heck lets just say hot or cold pie being an exception. | |||
|
Victim of Life's Circumstances |
Anecdotal and not about smoking but this has the ring of truth. http://www.wdrb.com/story/3845...fter-issues-with-dcs LOUISVILLE, Ky. (WDRB) – An Indiana family feels it was bullied out of the state it's always called home. Last year, Lelah and Jade Jerger said their now 2-year-old daughter Jaelah was medically kidnapped and forced to use a certain medicine for her epilepsy when, in reality, CBD oil was more effective. That's when the family starting having problems with the Department of Child Services. “The DCS cases just kept coming, and we kept getting reported for just the most insane things,” Lelah Jerger said. The allegations included that the Jergers were being abusive to each other or doing drugs. “False allegations. That’s what they are," Lelah Jerger said. "They're all false allegations.” On Thursday, there was yet another call from DCS. “We don't know what, because she wouldn’t tell us the allegations over the phone,” Lelah Jerger said. Without a warrant, the Jerger’s attorney said not to meet with DCS. They already had plans to move to Colorado but decided to abruptly leave that night. “We knew we had to get out of there. We had to get out of there now,” Lelah Jerger said. “It was if we stick around tonight, are they going to get a court order … or what are they going to do? We don't know.” The family's world was turned upside down. “We didn't expect to leave the way we did leave," Lelah Jerger said. "We didn't get to say goodbye to a lot of people. We hadn't gotten reported to DCS until our CBD investigation.” But that CBD oil case was closed months ago. “Are they really getting reports or are they trying to come back on us?" Lelah Jerger said. "Because we did get the case closed, and we'll never know." The Jergers also wonder if it's retaliation for their lawsuit against DCS. “I'm going to be honest: I don't see us returning,” Lelah Jerger said. As for the Jergers' lawsuit, the state filed a motion to dismiss and close the case. Their attorney filed a response and is now waiting on a judge's ruling. Earlier this year, Gov. Eric Holcomb signed a bill allowing sale of CBD oil in Indiana. ________________________ God spelled backwards is dog | |||
|
Honky Lips |
I remain an ardent libertarian. pass the bong, man. | |||
|
Ammoholic |
Here's the answer to OPs question. ^^^^ As far as if it should be done, yes. I think it should each state's right to decide if they want it or not. Jesse Sic Semper Tyrannis | |||
|
Member |
The ability to smoke pot for recreational use is not an effective bulwark against tyranny, and as such is not enshrined as a fundamental right in our founding documents. Your comparison is without merit. Demand not that events should happen as you wish; but wish them to happen as they do happen, and you will go on well. -Epictetus | |||
|
Lead slingin' Parrot Head |
As I posted to P220 Smudge, I absolutely agree that the increase in the homeless population is not solely due the legalization of marijuana. It is a complicated issue. However the jump in the population as I observed it correlated to when pot was legalized. Also, there have been news stories and interviews with some pot users who lived out of the state, had no job or money, and admitted to moving to Colorado when pot was legalized. Some wanted to work in the pot industry and likely got jobs here, however some did not. Also, and to be fair, there are those who depend on medicinal marijuana to treat various diseases and conditions and they also expressly moved to Colorado to do so. Colorado actually has seen a fairly large exodus by residents in recent years...BUT it has been offset by an influx of new residents and yes we have seen a net boom in population. I agree that we are dealing with all the issues that come with growth, and homelessness is certainly one of them. I'm not suggesting that pot legalization is the sole factor in the homeless population increase, just a significant one. When I voted to legalize marijuana one of the several benefits I expected to see was the illegal pot black market dwindle or disappear. However, in taxing pot so heavily the black market for pot still thrives as an economic, if not risky, way to partake. You make a very good point...I would be in favor of nation wide marijuana decriminalization and allowing the states to determine how to handle it. However, and until I see individual responsibility become the norm and strictly enforced by law, I would remain opposed to legalization at the state level. | |||
|
Member |
As with many things, it is probably invalid to say that pot"caused" any suicide or murder. But we have to recognize the statistical spectrum on all these influences. There is a certain fraction of unstable individuals who are "pushed over the edge" by psychoactive chemicals. "Crom is strong! If I die, I have to go before him, and he will ask me, 'What is the riddle of steel?' If I don't know it, he will cast me out of Valhalla and laugh at me." | |||
|
Thank you Very little |
Have to agree with above, the vote won't change anything, the left will just declare victory and the press will report that their work (progressives and media) finally forced the right to concede they were wrong and the that the left was correct. In the end it will be seen as a victory of the left who finally got the old stodgy right white men to release their old religious unfounded racism against pot smokers view and accept the lefts morally right pro pot viewpoint. In the end it will eliminate the debate on open free pot sales, however the future will be the debate on taxes, revenue sharing, and the criminal aspect of recreational pot use, no different than the enforcement of illegal acts committed while intoxicated with liquor. | |||
|
Frangas non Flectes |
Thanks for the links. I was under the impression the strong pot killed these people. What I'm reading isn't all that different or more compelling than if these people had been drunk instead of stoned. Wildly impaired is wildly impaired. The story about the kid leaping off the building is sad, but so are stories of college kids binge drinking themselves to death, or into situations that end in their death, and those are sadly, hardly uncommon.
I don't know what the tax structure is like in Colorado, but when it was on the ballot here in Washington, I actually voted against it because it was a shit bill. Here, it gets taxed three different times before it even makes it to a store shelf, at 75% each time. 1967goat posted earlier that it's gotten cheaper, but I think that's all relative to what quality level you're looking at, because as I understand it here, weed is anywhere from $8 a gram to $25 a gram. That's in line with old school street prices. Yes, you can walk into a store and buy Natural Ice on sale and get an 18 rack for the same price you might pay for a six pack of Heineken. You get what you pay for, but when you're paying the same price at the store that you used to pay your guy, and your guy has dropped his prices to compete, well....
I agree that federally, something needs to happen. I also think that if it was dropped to schedule 3 or something less idiotic, you'd see a lot of states legalize, and the influx of shitheads we've suffered in Washington and Colorado would disperse some. ______________________________________________ “There are plenty of good reasons for fighting, but no good reason ever to hate without reservation, to imagine that God Almighty Himself hates with you, too.” | |||
|
Peace through superior firepower |
Sounds like some of you boys could benefit from a toke. Don't worry, you won't grow horns or murder a nun. | |||
|
Gracie Allen is my personal savior! |
I disagree for three reasons. First, over the past ten or so years, Republicans have been just as likely to support legalization or decriminalization as Democrats. After all, the Dems figure the "legalize it" crowd belongs to them so the Dems are free to make excuses and do nothing just because they're afraid of goading "old white guys" into showing up on Election Day to vote for Republicans. Republicans, OTOH, have no reason to not act on either legalization or decriminalization. Second, I don't believe (from what I've read, at any rate) that there was any sort of penalty or boost for either Republicans or Democrats who supported the repeal of Prohibition. It just never had a lasting effect on American politics. Third, and I can testify to this from my own knowledge, there are plenty of young conservative and libertarian Republicans out there who'd just as soon light a joint as crack a beer.
And yet there are still counties out there where you cannot legally produce or sell alcohol. If local governments in Colorado can use ordinances to shut out legal pot sales, why can't local governments in other states do the same thing? Legalization doesn't obviate regulation, and regulation has worked as an effective ban in the past when it comes to marijuana, alcohol, exotic pets from the Amazon, etc. | |||
|
Member |
People can smoke up til their heads explode as long as I don’t have to smell that crap. | |||
|
Lawyers, Guns and Money |
That's where I stand on most things. The Founders certainly did not intend to create an omnipotent federal government to regulate the activities of citizens. Quite the contrary: When the Constitution was sent to the states for ratification in 1787, many citizens worried that the new national government proposed by the document was a Leviathan in waiting. During the crucial New York ratification debate, James Madison, writing as Publius, sought to allay these fears in the 45th Federalist Paper by emphasizing that adoption of the Constitution would create a government of enumerated, and therefore strictly limited, powers. Madison said: "The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined... [and] will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce...."[1] Federal tax collectors, Madison assured everyone, "will be principally on the seacoast, and not very numerous."[2] Exactly six months after publication of this essay, New York became the 11th state to ratify the Constitution. https://www.heritage.org/polit...-it-possible-restore "Some things are apparent. Where government moves in, community retreats, civil society disintegrates and our ability to control our own destiny atrophies. The result is: families under siege; war in the streets; unapologetic expropriation of property; the precipitous decline of the rule of law; the rapid rise of corruption; the loss of civility and the triumph of deceit. The result is a debased, debauched culture which finds moral depravity entertaining and virtue contemptible." -- Justice Janice Rogers Brown "The United States government is the largest criminal enterprise on earth." -rduckwor | |||
|
Nullus Anxietas |
Annnnnd away we go. Again. "America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system,,,, but too early to shoot the bastards." -- Claire Wolfe "If we let things terrify us, life will not be worth living." -- Seneca the Younger, Roman Stoic philosopher | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |