SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    What in the world does the Secretary of Education do to justify 24/7 security at ~$20 Million/year?
Page 1 2 3 4 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
What in the world does the Secretary of Education do to justify 24/7 security at ~$20 Million/year? Login/Join 
Oh stewardess,
I speak jive.
Picture of 46and2
posted
Seriously. What possible contribution to this country and the world can a person in such a position make, even in the most theoretical sense, to make that expense worth it at all?

Has she personally solved the plethora of issues that plague our education system? Did she personally invent a new way to teach complex mathematics or even hire the one who did?

Did she, even as a lowly administrator sort, actually optimize and improve things within our education system? Is it, say, 30% more efficient under her, ahem, leadership? No.

Is this fool the second coming of Plato, Newton, da Vinci, Einstein, Jefferson, Franklin, or a thousand other people who actually made a real contribution to educating the world?

Fuck No! She doesn't even deserve to breathe the same air as the world's great thinkers and educators. She's slug slime compared to them, on her very best day.

There's simply no fucking way this fool necessitates or deserves such an absurd expense. The Secretary of Education is 14th in the Presidential Line of Succession. Fourteenth, FFS...

And it's not like all Cabinet Members get such protection.

WTF is going on here?

How is this anything other than yet another absurdly wasteful expense on our dime?

source
 
Posts: 25613 | Registered: March 12, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Ubique
Picture of TSE
posted Hide Post
Well it wouldn't be necessary if Antifa and the other crazy leftards would stop threatening and harassing everyone they consider to be an evil Nazi. Perhaps they could use the vote to express their opinion?


Calgary Shooting Centre
 
Posts: 1522 | Location: Alberta | Registered: July 06, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of lkdr1989
posted Hide Post
Nice hit piece on DeVos from NBC.

  • Insinuate that she personally asked for all the security
  • Interject the she's a wealthy person line - Marie Antoinette
  • Accuse other Cabinet members of corruption
  • Play the enraged taxpayer card - taxpayer's are paying for her frivolity


No coincidence that NBC released this article the same day, the Dept of Education has released new Title IX regulations regarding Due Process.

ACLU's response to Due Process:





...let him who has no sword sell his robe and buy one. Luke 22:35-36 NAV

"Behold, I send you out as sheep in the midst of wolves; so be shrewd as serpents and innocent as doves." Matthew 10:16 NASV
 
Posts: 4409 | Location: Valley, Oregon | Registered: June 03, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Look she advocated for guns in schools to protect kids from Grizzly bear attacks. Go easy on her.
 
Posts: 17719 | Location: Stuck at home | Registered: January 02, 2015Reply With QuoteReport This Post
wishing we
were congress
posted Hide Post
It is a lot of $, but not 20 mil per year.

It is 20 mil for 3 years.

Still expensive, but the left hates her

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/...rity-detail-n2536088

Education Secretary Betsy DeVos unveiled new Title IX rules Friday which offer more due process protection for persons accused of sexual harassment. The rule changes, in part, narrow the definition of sexual misconduct and require alleged victims to provide a higher standard of evidence. The incident must also be reported to certain officials, and it must have occurred on campus.

Groups critical of the move, like the ACLU, say the proposed changes will "make schools less safe for survivors of sexual assault and harassment" and further discourage victims from reporting crimes.

bullshit

Some people are so opposed to the Title IX announcement that they are threatening DeVos. The threats are so serious that she now needs 24/7 security from the U.S. Marshals Service. It's a frightening thing, but some media are choosing to focus on the cost of the added security, as opposed to the necessity of it.
 
Posts: 19759 | Registered: July 21, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
They also hate her because her brother is Erik Prince, owner of what used to be Blackwater.
 
Posts: 16097 | Location: Eastern Iowa | Registered: May 21, 2000Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Erik Prince is quite the character. His life would be an interesting movie. I imagine he has his hands into all kinds of stuff.
 
Posts: 17719 | Location: Stuck at home | Registered: January 02, 2015Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Why doesn't she purchase and carry a handgun like the rest of us?

That would be a lot cheaper.


*********
"Some people are alive today because it's against the law to kill them".
 
Posts: 8228 | Location: Arizona | Registered: August 17, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by TSE:
Well it wouldn't be necessary if Antifa and the other crazy leftards would stop threatening and harassing everyone they consider to be an evil Nazi. Perhaps they could use the vote to express their opinion?


I agree. The Left wants to play games, this is the end result. I don't care much it costs.
 
Posts: 5821 | Location: Chicago | Registered: August 18, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Oh stewardess,
I speak jive.
Picture of 46and2
posted Hide Post
You're right, it's not $20 Million a year, more like an average of $8 Million a year. By Grabthar's hammer, wow what a savings. I mean, that's *only* ~$22,000/day to protect her.

No big deal, eh? A nearly useless privileged bureaucrat in a nearly useless position. I ask again... what, precisely, or hell - even theoretically, does she do to warrant this expense?
 
Posts: 25613 | Registered: March 12, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
I'd imagine much of it is out of her control - as a Cabinet member, I'd imagine there's full time security that she neither wants or asks for.

I'm opposed the high cost, but I'm not a big fan of bullies and Antifa crap roughing her up when we she appears in public.


P229
 
Posts: 3985 | Location: Sacramento, CA | Registered: November 21, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Leatherneck
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by GWbiker:
Why doesn't she purchase and carry a handgun like the rest of us?

That would be a lot cheaper.


I’m thinking that the threats against her are a bit more significant than the threats against the rest of us.




“Everybody wants a Sig in the sheets but a Glock on the streets.” -bionic218 04-02-2014
 
Posts: 15288 | Location: Florida | Registered: May 07, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Little ray
of sunshine
Picture of jhe888
posted Hide Post
We shouldn't even have a Secretary of Education. Education isn't a federal matter. Leave it to the states.




The fish is mute, expressionless. The fish doesn't think because the fish knows everything.
 
Posts: 53447 | Location: Texas | Registered: February 10, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of PGT
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by jhe888:
We shouldn't even have a Secretary of Education. Education isn't a federal matter. Leave it to the states.


One could argue that point but then you realize how behind the curve SC and MS are and wonder if the money we DO spend is worth a crap
 
Posts: 3193 | Location: Loudoun VA | Registered: December 21, 2014Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Nature does not hurry, yet everything is accomplished
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Pale Horse:
quote:
Originally posted by GWbiker:
Why doesn't she purchase and carry a handgun like the rest of us?

That would be a lot cheaper.


I’m thinking that the threats against her are a bit more significant than the threats against the rest of us.


So what? She's just another one of these privileged 'do what I say, not what I do' assholes. Didn't that prick Pruitt have a detail like this too and spent loads of my tax dollars on a new 'quiet room' or safe room or whatever the hell it was when the building he worked in already had one? If she wants the security she should pay for it herself. She doesn't need anything more than whatever is standard and I don't want to f'ing pay for it. Who the fuck do these people think they are?
 
Posts: 4091 | Location: NC | Registered: December 20, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of dsiets
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by cyberiad:
So what? She's just another one of these privileged 'do what I say, not what I do' assholes...
... If she wants the security she should pay for it herself. She doesn't need anything more than whatever is standard and I don't want to f'ing pay for it. Who the fuck do these people think they are?

If you read the article, and if you read the previous comments in the thread, you would have read that the security detail is not by her request.
 
Posts: 7555 | Location: MI | Registered: May 22, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Ubique
Picture of TSE
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 46and2:
You're right, it's not $20 Million a year, more like an average of $8 Million a year. By Grabthar's hammer, wow what a savings. I mean, that's *only* ~$22,000/day to protect her.

No big deal, eh? A nearly useless privileged bureaucrat in a nearly useless position. I ask again... what, precisely, or hell - even theoretically, does she do to warrant this expense?


Well if the security is supposed to be tied to the importance of the position, why waste money protecting ex presidents and their families?


Calgary Shooting Centre
 
Posts: 1522 | Location: Alberta | Registered: July 06, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Baroque Bloke
Picture of Pipe Smoker
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by jhe888:
We shouldn't even have a Secretary of Education. Education isn't a federal matter. Leave it to the states.

I give you that. But since since there’s a Sec. of Education cabinet position, it’s good that we have one that advocates for school choice.



Serious about crackers
 
Posts: 9729 | Location: San Diego | Registered: July 26, 2014Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Glorious SPAM!
Picture of mbinky
posted Hide Post
There wouldn't be a dime spent on security if the office holder didn't have to worry about threats from insurgents.
 
Posts: 10647 | Registered: June 13, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
SIGforum Official
Eye Doc
Picture of bcereuss
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by jhe888:
We shouldn't even have a Secretary of Education. Education isn't a federal matter. Leave it to the states.


Carrying the torch. Good on you.
 
Posts: 3064 | Location: (Occupied) Northern Minnesota | Registered: June 24, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3 4  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    What in the world does the Secretary of Education do to justify 24/7 security at ~$20 Million/year?

© SIGforum 2024