^^^^^

Same with Breitbart

That really took their minds off Russia, didn't it?

quote:

I get that he has a great resume and all, but I thought the big tenet of ethical behavior was to not only avoid conflicts of interest, but also the appearance of impropriety. According to both Mueller and Comey they are very close friends and colleagues and have been for years.

Not to mention all those "outstanding and impartial" democraPs he hired. Most/all of them big supporters of the hildabeast and/o other democraPs.

He is not "neutral" and neither are any of those he appointed to help him railroad the Trump machine.

http://www.cnn.com/2017/07/21/...committee/index.html

Susan Rice, who served as former President Barack Obama's national security adviser, quietly met behind closed doors Friday with Senate intelligence committee investigators probing Russian meddling in the elections, according to an official familiar with the matter.

Rice, one of three former Obama officials who met with the panel this week, has come under sharp scrutiny from some House Republicans because they believe she improperly "unmasked" -- or revealed the identities collected in intelligence gathering -- of Trump associates in US intelligence reports. She has vigorously denied any wrongdoing.

**********

I am so tired of all this delay do-nothing BS.

We heard repeatedly that anyone who unmasked would leave a document trail.

So, what do the documents say ?

REPs control CIA, NSA, DNI etc. what is the hangup ?

quote:

REPs control CIA, NSA, DNI etc. what is the hangup ?

I wouldn't say so. The "deep state" agencies are full of Democraps and globalists. It's a big swamp.

The thing that I am seeing with the folks that DJT has hired for jobs in his administration, is IF you do a good job, you keep your job. IF not, you are shown the door!!! I imagine that DJT is not an easy person to work for, and then add in all of the stress that the Left and MSM place on him.....that has got to be nearly unbearable.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-g...federal-regulations/

President Donald Trump’s White House has, according to Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Director Mick Mulvaney, removed or withdrawn about 860 Obama administration-era federal regulations.
The massive decrease in regulations is part of the Trump administration’s overall deregulatory agenda, Mulvaney said during a press briefing Thursday.

Updating reporters on President Trump’s 2-for-1 policy for federal regulations — which requires cutting two regulations for every one new implemented regulation — Mulvaney said we are at 16-to-1, Breitbart News’s Michelle Moons reports.

Speaking to the “slow accretion, that slow cancer that can come from regulatory burdens that we put on our people,” the OMB director said during the “last six months here, the Obama Administration put on over six billion dollars in new regulatory burden,” adding, “We had zero.”

*************
part of the "real" news where reality lives

^^^^^ Excellent news!!! Real progress not to be forgotten....despite the fake news everywhere.

quote:

Originally posted by 6guns:
^^^^^ Excellent news!!! Real progress not to be forgotten....despite the fake news everywhere.

Low hanging fruit.

Wait until they try to repeal or amend one already in the Code of Federal Regulations.

That will require two terms to pull off, simply because of the administrative process.

quote:

Originally posted by sdy:
President Donald Trump’s White House has, according to Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Director Mick Mulvaney, removed or withdrawn about 860 Obama administration-era federal regulations.

Is there a list of those anywhere?

Here you go, you should be able to look up by agency and there's a PDF link of all the regulations being cut.

https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/eAgendaMain

quote:

Originally posted by Gustofer:

quote:

Originally posted by sdy:
President Donald Trump’s White House has, according to Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Director Mick Mulvaney, removed or withdrawn about 860 Obama administration-era federal regulations.

Is there a list of those anywhere?

"Sessions discussed Trump campaign-related matters with Russian ambassador, U.S. intelligence intercepts show"

WaPo link

BROKE: New FEC Report Shows DNC Finished June $3.3 Million in Debt

DNC Chair Tom Perez recently sent out a fundraising email to supporters claiming, “I know garbage when I see it,” citing that he once worked on a dump truck. It’s ironic that he referred to the GOP health care bill as a “flaming dumpster fire” because he has been presiding over the disaster that is the Democratic National Committee. The organization reported that May 2017 was its worst fundraising month since the Iraq War in 2003, and April 2017 was its worst fundraising month since 2009. In May, the DNC also reported that it has $1.9 million in debt. Despite the fact that former Secretary of Labor Tom Perez was recruited by Barack Obama to appease the party’s donors, lobbyists and PACs, even they have refused to prop up the failing brand.

Not approving of the strategies laid out at a retreat for donors in January 2017, billionaires Mark Pincus and Reid Hoffman started their own political organization, Win the Future. As donors are increasingly tired of seeing their investments go to waste, many have started their own funds or used their access to take over leadership positions themselves—such as Florida billionaire donor Stephen Bittel did to become the Florida Democratic Party chair earlier this year. Democratic billionaire J.B. Pritzker is running for governor of Illinois, and billionaire Tom Steyer is debating running for governor of California. Haim Saban and James Simons poured millions into Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign, but they have yet to be listed by the FEC as DNC donors in 2017. Additionally, George Soros has only given $33,900 to the DNC in 2017, but he poured millions of dollars into the Democratic Party in 2016.

In contrast, the RNC is on an amazing financial run, having raised a whopping $13.4 million in June.

According to The Hill:

The Republican National Committee (RNC) raised a record $13.4 million in June, bringing its total 2017 fundraising to $75.3 million.

In a release provided first to The Hill, the RNC announced another strong monthly haul and has $44.7 million in the bank. It’s the most the RNC has raised in June of a nonpresidential year.

RNC Chairwoman Ronna Romney McDaniel credited the record fundraising to the committee’s “loyal network of grassroots donors” due to their support for President Trump and the GOP’s agenda.

“Because of the generous contributions, the RNC will continue to promote conservative values while bolstering our efforts to support, defend, and elect more Republicans,” McDaniel said in a statement.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.co...ne-3-3-million-debt/

quote:

Originally posted by JALLEN:
"Sessions discussed Trump campaign-related matters with Russian ambassador, U.S. intelligence intercepts show"

WaPo link

So for this to be true an intelligence agent is willing to reveal US surveillance capability and very likely reveal a source. I can't believe someone is that deeply partisan and it is easier to imagine this is another fake story

This seems like the President throwing the AG under the bus. Two days ago, the President expresses his disdain regarding AG Sessions recusal, today information almost certainly calculated to cause his resignation is released. May be a little harsher than death by a thousand cuts.

quote:

Originally posted by JALLEN:

I have not read anything about Mueller that suggests he is untrustworthy, incompetent or excessively partisan.

Three of the four attorneys Mueller has appointed to help him with this investigation are major DNC and Clinton donors. He's a definite hack; either too stupid to know what he is doing, or too arrogant in his corruption to care. He's a sack and he should be sacked, immediately.



.

quote:

Originally posted by Balzé Halzé:
They likely have it right this time. Business Insider pretty much gave the same reasons.

Business Insider a left wing site, and a joke.



.

quote:

Originally posted by TSE:

quote:

Originally posted by JALLEN:
"Sessions discussed Trump campaign-related matters with Russian ambassador, U.S. intelligence intercepts show"

WaPo link

So for this to be true an intelligence agent is willing to reveal US surveillance capability and very likely reveal a source. I can't believe someone is that deeply partisan and it is easier to imagine this is another fake story

The Ruskies know by now that they can't take a leak without the US knowing all about it.

The story claims that the Ambassador was picked up reporting it to Moscow, so there is no tape of Sessions and it is the Ambassador's version of what was said.

quote:

Originally posted by TigerDore:

quote:

Originally posted by Balzé Halzé:
They likely have it right this time. Business Insider pretty much gave the same reasons.

Business Insider a left wing site, and a joke.



.

I was wondering why all their articles are crap.