Once again, President Trump speaks the truth and shoves the steel into Pissing Little Mitt:

Trump continues attacks on Mitt Romney, says Democrats have bad policies but 'they stick together'

Sorry, Mitt, but he's right, you fucking phony. You do not, nor have you ever had the balls to support your own party, you pandering, sore loser little whiner.

Lindsey Graham wrote to the UK, Italy, and Australia asking them to assist AG Barr in investigations of the foreign influence in the 2016 presidential election

Graham was one of the most vocal Republicans who said that Donald Trump would not get the nomination of his party, and if he did, he would lose to Hillary Clinton. That's right, man. Some of us remember and will never forget your bullshit.

However, I will say that the man has pitched in to help the President he thought this nation would never have, so, you're not all bad, Lindsey. You're just shortsighted.

^^^ and hopefully done eating crow and will continue to help our cause.

REP Senator Ron Johnson takes it to Chuck Todd

video at link

https://www.breitbart.com/clip...d-trump-feel-better/

the video is more complete and powerful than the article text

I was proud of Linsey's full throated defense Justice Kavanaugh. Same can be said of McConnell. They're nowhere near perfect, but they came through when it counted.

This time.

Some weaselly Law Professor on FNC today talking to Eric Shawn: "The 2nd whistleblower's account will reportedly corroborate the 1st whistleblower's account." WTF? I feel like I'm in a Joseph Heller novel.

quote:

Who would Susan Collins prefer? She is a Senator yet she has sat on her thumbs about Biden's appearance of impropriety for years.

Anybody but Trump! I am not convinced she knows what planet this is.

USA Today’s Susan Page: By 2-1 margin, Americans view investigating Biden’s “unseemly” behavior as “legitimate”

https://twitter.com/RealSaaved...ne-trump-new-poll%2F

Jim

[QUOTE]Originally posted by parabellum:
Do you want to be informed about this Ukraine mess, better than 95% of the American public?

Take 40 minutes and watch this. This is today's episode of Life, Liberty & Levin, with Mark Levin talking with Peter Schweizer. Forty minutes and no commercials. If you don't want to invest this scant amount of time, at least watch between 24:30 and 25:50 and listen to what Peter Schweizer says. He distills down to its essence the reason why Donald Trump is so hated in Washington, but, really, do yourself a favor and watch the entire episode:

[/FLASH_VIDEO][/QUOTE] I think this might be the same video as above. [FLASH_VIDEO]

quote:

Originally posted by tk13:

quote:

Originally posted by parabellum:
I hope they produce a third whistleblower, a psychic

Maybe they can get Johnny Wishbone, from the Island of St Croix.

Maybe they could finally get some action out of the "remote viewers" they've had tucked away. (Art Bell strikes again.)

The CIA is tasked with overthrowing governments. Little did we know they'd try to do it to ours.

Downloaded with "4k Video Downloader" App (thanks Para!).

Just in case it's deplatformed again.

Watched the Levin interview. Very informative.

Levin lets the person being interviewed to talk. He jumps in once in a while but he adds to the story when he does.

Schweizer is very smart and a real investigative reporter. He is the one who also wrote "Clinton Cash".

If REPs were smart, they would hire Schweizer at a high salary and make him staff to a Senate committee w balls. Turn him loose w some Senate juice.

quote:

Originally posted by Balzé Halzé:
Some weaselly Law Professor on FNC today talking to Eric Shawn: "The 2nd whistleblower's account will reportedly corroborate the 1st whistleblower's account." WTF? I feel like I'm in a Joseph Heller novel.

It's Catch 22 logic.

Congressman Chris Stewart (R-Utah) with Chris Wallace this morning when he asked him about the revelation of a 2nd "whistleblower":

"It does not matter," Stewart said, acknowledging that he was aware of the second whistleblower before news broke Sunday morning. "This person is gonna come forward and say, 'Yep, the president had this phone call and, yep, that’s the transcript.' Uh, I mean, why should I care at all what his perspective, or his opinion, uh, judgment of this transcript is? You and I can read it."

Exactly!

quote:

Originally posted by Elk Hunter:

quote:

Who would Susan Collins prefer? She is a Senator yet she has sat on her thumbs about Biden's appearance of impropriety for years.

Anybody but Trump! I am not convinced she knows what planet this is.

Romney, Collins and surely others have similar Ukraine skeletons in the closet. The swamp is not only deep but far reaching. I hope a few more get nailed.

If anyone asks what shows due process, consider this:

"While there is no definitive list of the "required procedures" that due process requires, Judge Henry Friendly generated a list that remains highly influential, as to both content and relative priority:

1. An unbiased tribunal.
2. Notice of the proposed action and the grounds asserted for it.
3. Opportunity to present reasons why the proposed action should not be taken.
4. The right to present evidence, including the right to call witnesses.
5. The right to know opposing evidence.
6. The right to cross-examine adverse witnesses.
7. A decision based exclusively on the evidence presented.
8. Opportunity to be represented by counsel.
9. Requirement that the tribunal prepare a record of the evidence presented.
10. Requirement that the tribunal prepare written findings of fact and reasons for its decision." LINK

President Trump has a personal right to demand due process in the Congressional "investigative" process because it is historically precedented and needed to inform all House members of the facts on which they will be expected to vote.

Pelosi and the anti-statesman Democrats are denying due process.

Why this fear of being fair to the president?

Someone might say, "But the House process is like a grand jury." but even there, the prosecutor has fairness (due process) imposed by law.

They can't, for instance, outright lie and make up evidence as Schiff did right out of the gate.