Representative Full-Stop by Sarah Hoyt on PJ Media. Sarah Hoyt is a science-fiction writer, and write she can:
quote:
Representative Full Stop House Oversight and Reform Committee member Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y. Tuesday, Feb. 26, 2019. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite) I have decided that henceforth and for the foreseeable future, the woman who calls herself Ocasio-Cortez and who is more descriptively titled Occasional Cortex shall be known as Representative Full Stop.
The name has its origin here: "My last name is Ocasio-Cortez. Full stop. That’s my name."
I'll first confess why this nonsense irritated me: When she says things like "No, you can’t say 'Cortez.' I’ve never used that in my life. 'Cortez' is referring to someone else. Even if they‘re trying to be rude + wrong, my dad’s last name was Ocasio anyway. (His name was hyphenated too, though.)" She's assuming that we give a good g*dd*mn what her dad's name was.
Most of us are aware that Spaniards have their mother's surname last. It's a cute habit that has bitten me in the butt because the Portuguese don't do that. And yet, proto-politically-correct people in Ohio in 1981 assumed so and assume they were gratifying me by handing me a diploma that has Silva as my surname. Look, Representative Full Stop, we don't care. You're an American, born in America. You have the arrant presumption of thinking you can serve as a representative for Americans, but you wish to hold onto to this nonsense that your surname is not your surname because it wasn't your dad's name? Pick a surname, your mother's or your fathers, and make it your surname. We don't care which. Resolve it between the two still-functioning brain cells in your otherwise empty head.
Yeah, sure people have the right to have hyphenated surnames and dual surnames. And most people will try to accommodate them, and that's fine, but in the end, it's like trying to accommodate people's chosen pronouns. We do it because we're nice people and we try to be polite. But you don't have the right to demand that people address you in a certain way. That's compelled speech, and you can't make us. You're impinging upon our First Amendment rights and our right to tell you to take a hike. If what we call you is an insult — like, say, Occasional Cortex — you can be offended. And you can call us names back. But just because someone forgot your double-barrel hyphenated moniker, you don't have the right to dictate to us that this is your name "full stop." Oh, yeah? You and what army, Representative Full Stop? Come to my street and make me.
Having grown up in a Latin country, I KNOW what a double-barreled last name means. It means you're from a "good family" and you're "someone." Representative Full Stop will just have to learn that we're Americans. We're all someone, our families are all good, and we don't have superiors. The bastards ain't been born.
She thinks we call her Cortez because we want to be rude. Ah! Representative Full Stop has absolutely no idea how rude we can be. My circles delight in coming up with rude, ridiculous and apt nicknames for her. Chiquita Guevara, Occasional Cortex, Che Dumbara. That's rude. Forgetting your double-barreled self-important moniker is not being rude. It's a slip of the tongue and frankly not caring enough about you to make sure you are always happy with the way you're addressed. And that's not rude. That's putting you in your place. Boss though you might imagine yourself, you're not that important. You're another miss-educated product of what passes for excellent schools in the U.S., with your mind filled with crazy socialist nonsense and no ability to do anything productive ever.
But Sarah, you'll say, making up ridiculous names for her is mean, it's not civil and it makes us as bad as them.
Are you kidding me? This woman wants to institute a regime that would have you in chains if not dead, and that would allow her descendants to lord it over your descendants, like Whoa Fat Lords it over North Korea. And you think making up funny names for her is mean and "just like them?" You must be kidding me.
Look, I read someone saying we shouldn't mock her because we need to take her seriously as a threat. (The Bookworm Room. Excellent blog.) And I get where the author is coming from, but like all smart people she's sometimes wrong, and she's wrong on this one.
Sure, we should take the threat of socialism and communism seriously. We should debunk it on a deep and thoughtful level.
But we should not treat their instrument, sent forth to try to break our system, as some kind of serious intellectual, or even, as I've heard Representative Full Stop called, "energetic and full of potential" or some other idiocy.
We did that with Obama, a man who couldn't string two words together without a teleprompter, and what did it get us? Nothing. It got the establishment confirmed in their idea that he was "very smart" and "a deep thinker."
Most of the "intellectual establishment" and the artificers of public discourse are not themselves smart at any level. What they are in fact is good at reading social capital.
And up till now, signaling left and parroting their atrocious pap has been good political capital. It's socially aspirational, which is why all the tech millionaires do it, one after the other.
Do you know why? Because they call us stupid and mock us, often incoherently Anyone remember Romney's women in binders? (Yes, I take your point, Romney probably isn't right-wing. BUT he was representing the right wing in that case). And we are very polite to them and treat them as though their ceremonial degrees, handed out by other leftists, for parroting the right words, are some kind of mental feat. So if you signal left, everyone treats you like you're not ridiculous. Gee, I wonder what I'd choose if I were politically unattached.
Do you like losing the culture? Are you committed to handing future generations to the left by default? Are you absolutely sure the best possible thing would be for the narrative of the left to become universal?
No? Then start making fun of them. Every chance you get, you push their nose in. You make them so ridiculous that even the left is ashamed to count these total idiots in their number.
And frankly, there are few more idiotic than Representative Full Stop.
At least we hope she lives up to her new name and there are no more after them. I mean, having brought forth the Capo de tutti Idioti, what could the left do for an encore?
Point and laugh and call them on their crazy. The culture war is won ROFL.
Representative Full-Stop...or Full-Stop for short.
I like it. That will burn her worse than anything we come up with because she will always be the one that started it. Like making air quotes in a serious conversation.
“Remember to get vaccinated or a vaccinated person might get sick from a virus they got vaccinated against because you’re not vaccinated.” - author unknown
"... having brought forth the Capo de tutti Idioti, what could the left do for an encore?"
"America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system,,,, but too early to shoot the bastards." -- Claire Wolfe "If we let things terrify us, life will not be worth living." -- Seneca the Younger, Roman Stoic philosopher
In the article above, Sarah Hoyt gives Rep Full Stop too much credit..........there is NO WAY there are two functioning brain cells in her head, at the most one misfiring brain cell; the one that controls the anus but is mistakenly wired to the mouth.
Posts: 4166 | Location: St.Louis County MO | Registered: October 13, 2006
"I won't be wronged, I won't be insulted, and I won't be laid a hand on. I don't do these things to other people and I require the same from them." - John Wayne in "The Shootist"
Posts: 3541 | Location: California | Registered: May 31, 2004
Ocasio-Cortez erupts in unhinged rant after criticism of her Green New Deal
By Thomas Lifson
Life in the public spotlight is uncomfortable for anyone, all the more so for the young and immature who are subject to relentless criticism by ideological opponents. Add in absolute moral certainty and a limited command of facts and ideas, and the result is lashing out in fury with arguments that hold no water.
Yesterday, during a committee meeting of House Financial Services Committee, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's utopian and impossibly expensive Green New deal was criticized by Sean Duffy (R-Wis.) and herself was not pleased. She responded with an arm-flailing angry response that proved she has no idea of the difference between pollution by toxic substances and the phony "pollution" that it is claimed CO2 constitutes, despite the fact that it is the very basis of our life cycle. Somebody needs to tell her we are a "carbon-based life form"...and then clear out to avoid damage when her head explodes:
The video is under two minutes long and worth watching to get an accurate sense of the limits of her mind and the appeal of such simple-minded demagoguery to a substantial constutency.
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is a gifted demagogue who is persuasive to those who are unable to think critically, which makes her dangerous, especially given the miseducation of her generation and her base. And she is especially dangerous to anyone paying attention and in possession of a general store of knowledge an informed citizen and voter would be expected to have (a group that excludes many Democrats).
"Some things are apparent. Where government moves in, community retreats, civil society disintegrates and our ability to control our own destiny atrophies. The result is: families under siege; war in the streets; unapologetic expropriation of property; the precipitous decline of the rule of law; the rapid rise of corruption; the loss of civility and the triumph of deceit. The result is a debased, debauched culture which finds moral depravity entertaining and virtue contemptible." -- Justice Janice Rogers Brown
"The United States government is the largest criminal enterprise on earth." -rduckwor
Posts: 25697 | Location: St. Louis, MO | Registered: April 03, 2009
Originally posted by sigcrazy7: "Science should not be partisan."
I couldn't agree more, AOC. Now get govt out of climate science so that scientists can get back to doing science instead of seeking grants.
It's time for the meteor if this country is being led by 29 year old former bartenders who seriously expect us to listen to them as experts on science.
Posts: 6093 | Location: FL | Registered: March 09, 2009
I made it through her 2 minute conniption. Go back to the Taco shack AOC.
"I won't be wronged, I won't be insulted, and I won't be laid a hand on. I don't do these things to other people and I require the same from them." - John Wayne in "The Shootist"
Posts: 3541 | Location: California | Registered: May 31, 2004
Originally posted by medic451: I made it through her 2 minute conniption. Go back to the Taco shack AOC.
The mere fact that someone with this level of IQ and hold on reality could rise to the position she currently holds proves we have subsets of the electorate who are completely insane.
Additionally, maybe AOC should be offering up a heart felt thank you to all of us for providing her with health insurance rather than bad mouthing the country we live in.
----------------------------- Guns are awesome because they shoot solid lead freedom. Every man should have several guns. And several dogs, because a man with a cat is a woman. Kurt Schlichter