I like this part:

"Former Clinton staffers have lashed out at Brazile due to her suggestion in the book that she considered replacing Clinton with Joe Biden, writing in an open letter to Brazile that she fell for "false Russian-fueled propaganda" about Clinton’s health ."

we watched Clinton cough and hack in multiple speeches, we watched her collapse into the van, she avoided giving speeches in critical time periods. For a quite a while she let barack obama, michelle obama, biden, sanders etc carry the ball in campaigning.

But those old Russians, they sure can trick ya.

Russians must have slipped something into the Hag's tea...

quote:

Originally posted by sdy:
I like this part:

"Former Clinton staffers have lashed out at Brazile due to her suggestion in the book that she considered replacing Clinton with Joe Biden, writing in an open letter to Brazile that she fell for "false Russian-fueled propaganda" about Clinton’s health ."

we watched Clinton cough and hack in multiple speeches, we watched her collapse into the van, she avoided giving speeches in critical time periods. For a quite a while she let barack obama, michelle obama, biden, sanders etc carry the ball in campaigning.

But those old Russians, they sure can trick ya.

What's the point in covering for shillary's health problems during the 2016 campaign? I'm confident she had problems and they are lying. Why not just tell the truth unless they'd lie on credit when they could tell the truth for free about this and it wouldn't matter at all now. Unless shill is thinking about a run in 2020.

A friend texted me the following this morning, I’m LOVING watching them tear each other to pieces over Lying Hillary

quote:

“Watching Donna Brazile on CBS. She’s pretty much walking back everything she said. The Clintons obviously sent her a fish in a newspaper.
Those two bitches on that show are trying to destroy her.
Norah and that Gale chick. Norah was visibly yelling at her LOL”

Just caught a quick glimpse of the ad, but I believe I saw that she is supposed to be on Tucker Carlson Wed night.

Anyone here know the status of the investigation into the Seth Rich "robbery"? Regards 18DAI

Gee, I wonder why she feared for her life....

November 8, 2017
Does Donna Brazile Know Who Killed Seth Rich?
By Daniel John Sobieski

The real bombshell lurking in Donna Brazile’s stunning interview with ABC’s George Stephanopoulos about her new book Hacks may be her cryptic references to murdered DNC IT staffer Seth Rich and her statement that she took the precautions one takes when one fears for their life.

So far, speculation about the unsolved murder of Seth Rich have been dismissed as right-wing conspiracy theories but Brazile’s references to him in the light of all that has come out about Wikileaks, the Fusion GPS dossier, and Hillary’s purchase of the DNC that rigged the primaries against Bernie Sanders, may be a key to a missing piece of this whole puzzle.

Brazile, according to Newsweek, in a piece titled “DNC’S Donna Brazile Dedicated Her Book To ‘Patriot’ Seth Rich, Whose Death Made Her Fear For Own Life”, dedicated her book in part to Rich:

A new book by Donna Brazile, the former interim chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee (DNC), has been making headlines for its controversial claims about the 2016 presidential election and the Hillary Clinton campaign. But the provocative points start even before the first chapter, as Brazile reportedly dedicated the book in part to Seth Rich, the DNC staffer whose murder launched a conspiracy theory.

Axios reported on Sunday that the book’s dedication reads, “In loving memory of my father, Lionel Brazile Sr.; my beloved sister, Sheila Brazioutlanle; my fearless uncles Nat, Floyd, and Douglas; Harlem’s finest, my aunt Lucille; my friend and mentor, David Kaufmann; my DNC colleague and patriot, Seth Rich; and my beloved Pomeranian, Chip Joshua Marvin Brazile (Booty Wipes). I miss y’all.” …Rich appears elsewhere in Brazile’s book, as the Post reported earlier in the weekend. She wrote that Rich’s murder haunted her and that she'd installed surveillance cameras at her home and would keep the blinds in her office window closed so she could not be seen by snipers, according to the Post. Brazile talked about Rich on ABC News’s This Week with George Stephanopoulos on Sunday. She told the host about her critics: “They don’t know what it was like to be over the DNC during this hacking. They don’t know what it’s like to bury a child. I did: Seth Rich.”

(While Newsweek missed a comma in the dedication -- Brazile is actually calling David Kaufmann a patriot, not Seth Rich -- that doesn's change the meaning any.)

Why did Donna Brazile fear for her life after Seth’s Rich unsolved murder? Were these cryptic references a way of warning those who she feared might do her harm that more would be revealed after her possible demise? Only Donna Brazile can elaborate, and it is doubtful she will at this point.

Seth’s murder remains a mystery with no apparent motive, not even a robbery gone wrong. As the Daily Caller Investigative Group observes in a piece titled “Donna Brazile Has A Theory About Who Killed Seth Rich”:

From her book Hacks:

I felt some responsibility for Seth Rich’s death. I didn’t bring him into the DNC, but I helped keep him there working on voting rights. With all I knew now about the Russians’ hacking, I could not help but wonder if they had played some part in his unsolved murder. Besides that, racial tensions were high that summer and I worried that he was murdered for being white on the wrong side of town. [My friend] Elaine expressed her doubts about that, and I heard her. The FBI said that they did not see any Russian fingerprints there.

Brazile repeatedly returns to the subject of being haunted by Rich’s murder, even though other Democrats have pounced on anyone who suggested that the murder was anything other than a robbery gone wrong. The DNC data staffer was killed days before Wikileaks began publishing its emails, and his valuables were not taken.

The Russians did not provide Wikileaks with any purloined emails or other documents, according to Wikileaks founder Julian Assange. As Fox News reported on Assange’s interview with Sean Hannity:

Wikileaks founder Julian Assange denied Thursday that hacked emails from the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton's campaign chairman John Podesta were stolen and passed to his organization by Russian state actors.

"Our source is not the Russian government," Assange told "The Sean Hannity Show."

"So in other words, let me be clear," Hannity asked, "Russia did not give you the Podesta documents or anything from the DNC?"

"That's correct," Assange responded.

Seth Rich, being a DNC IT staffer, if he did not provide the documents and emails to Wikileaks himself, might have been in a position to know who did and how. We do know the DNC denied the FBI access to the server that was allegedly hacked by the Russians:

The Democratic National Committee "rebuffed" a request from the FBI to examine its computer services after it was allegedly hacked by Russia during the 2016 election, a senior law enforcement official told CNN Thursday.

"The FBI repeatedly stressed to DNC officials the necessity of obtaining direct access to servers and data, only to be rebuffed until well after the initial compromise had been mitigated," a senior law enforcement official told CNN.

Perhaps Donna Brazile knows more about what the DNC was trying to hide from the FBI. Her shocking revelations in her book may be the tip of a rather large and unnerving iceberg. Perhaps Donna Brazile has an idea of who killed Seth Rich and why and that’s why she fears for her life.

http://www.americanthinker.com...illed_seth_rich.html

quote:

Unless shill is thinking about a run in 2020.

Unless she is dead or in jail I think you've got it.

quote:

... I worried that he was murdered for being white on the wrong side of town. [

HORSESHIT!! HORSESHIT!! HORSESHIT!!

Rich lived in Bloomingdale, a neighborhood in the Northwest quadrant of Washington, D.C., less than two miles (3 km) north of the United States Capitol building. It is a primarily residential neighborhood, with a small commercial center near the intersection of Rhode Island Avenue and First Street NW featuring bars, restaurants, and food markets.

The "wrong side" of DC is southeast and southwest DC, particularly across the Anacostia River.

My spouse attended Howard University, which is half a mile away. Back in the mid-80s that area wasn't exactly great, but with the Metrorail coming through in 1985-88, gentrification took an iron-fisted capitalist hold and proceeded to drive out the poor, predominately black, community. In 1985-86 I was the graveyard shift safety guy on the tunnel from Gallery Place to Shaw and even though I walked those streets topside to get to the three sites we had, I never had an issue with the dope dealers and whores and the other law abiding residents.

Poor Hillary...

Donna Brazile is on Tucker Carlson tonight. Not sure what to expect but I’m gonna tune in.

Republicans are in trouble if Donna becomes the face of the party.
She presents herself well, and is well spoken.

Less than convincing on Tucker. Maybe they did get to her.

RMD

quote:

Originally posted by kimber1911:
Republicans are in trouble if Donna becomes the face of the party.
She presents herself well, and is well spoken.

I think Donna is trying to wash off the dirt of the Democrat party from herself and put some seperation between her and the dirty Clinton politics.

She is hoping to emerge as the founder of the new squeaky clean Democrat party and make her run in 2020.

But as I have said earlier the Clinton's aren't out of the game yet they will have something to say before this is all over.
They know all the skeletons in all the closets.

Donna's got the Clinton taint on her, no matter what.

And ye funne continueth...

quote:

Donna Brazile Criticizes Barack Obama's 'Titanic Eego' In Her New Book
Aris Folley, AOL, 11/8/17

Former interim DNC Chairwoman Donna Brazile said the Democratic Party was "leeched of its vitality" by former President Barack Obama and others in the months leading up to the 2016 presidential campaign. "We had three Democratic Parties: the party of Barack Obama, the party of Hillary Clinton, and this weak little vestige of a party led by [Florida Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz] that was doing a very poor job getting people who were not president elected," Brazile wrote in her newly released 2016 campaign tell-all, titled "Hacks: The Inside Story of the Break-ins and Breakdowns That Put Donald Trump In The White House."

Brazile accused the 44th president of caring "deeply about his image" and using the committee to act as a bank for his personal "political expenses." Obama "used the party to provide for political expenses like gifts to donors, and political travel," Brazile wrote, adding that the politician also used DNC funds for "his pollster and focus groups" later into his second term although he couldn't run for president again.

"This was not working to strengthen the party. He left it in debt. Hillary bailed it out so that she could control it, and Debbie went along with all of this because she liked the power and perks of being a chair but not the responsibilities," Brazile wrote. "I knew these three did not do this with malice. I knew if you woke any of them up in the middle of the night to ask them how they felt about the Democratic Pary they would answer with sincerity that they loved this party and all it had done for the country and for them. yet they had leeched it of its vitality and were continuing to do so."

Brazile, who assumed the DNC role in the interim following Schultz' resignation in 2016 after a trove of leaked emails showed the committee conspired to sabotage Senator Bernie Sanders' campaign, has been facing heat for speaking critically against members in her own party in recent months. "As I saw it, these three titanic egos - Barack, Hillary, and Debbie - had stripped the party to a shell for their own purposes," Brazile wrote.

Some editing for space and to avoid repetition. Original text at http://www.yahoo.com/news/donn...obama-192951618.html

Oh, Donna, silly Donna. It wasn't Barack's titanic ego, it was Valerie's titanic ego. And since when you refer to a former President and titan of the Democratic Party as just 'Barry'?

Donna's gone all Harper Valley P.T.A. on 'em.

Meow...




Link to original video: https://youtu.be/bmEw1VUFt_w

Like the person reporting this, I don't know about Steve McIntyre's expertise in hacking. From McIntyre's global warming studies, he analyzes data and tries to draw conclusions / connect the dots.

This does correlate to some of the things Brazile said in her book

http://www.powerlineblog.com/a...bermouth-angle-2.php

Since retiring he (Steve McIntyre) has applied himself to the ‘science’ behind anthropogenic global warming. He is detested by the usual climate con artists…because he has frequently exposed their fake science…After climategate he spent a long time researching that data leak.”

Then he came to the work of CrowdStrike, the consultant retained by the DNC to examine their servers and respond to the hack and on whose “forensics” the FBI et al. appear to have relied for that part of their analysis:

1. CrowdStrike was called in and supposedly installed its anti-breach software on May 6, 2016. However, much of the leaked emails were extracted from the DNC servers AFTER that date. Indeed, the leaked emails have clearly been “curated” based on his analysis of the dates in the metadata (e.g., there are few emails dated prior to April 19, when the hack is meant to have started, but hackers would have taken everything they could extract once they got it in).

Steve writes: “There were no fewer than 14409 emails in the Wikileaks archive dating after Crowdstrike’s installation of its security software. In fact, more emails were hacked after Crowdstrike’s discovery [of the breach] on May 6 than before. Whatever actions were taken by CrowdStrike on May 6, they did nothing to stem the exfiltration of emails from the DNC”; and

2. “The DHS-FBI intel assessment of the DNC hack [linked above] concluded with ‘high confidence’ that Guccifer 2 was a Russian operation, but provided (literally) no evidence in support of their attribution.

Ever since Guccifer 2’s surprise appearance on June 15, 2016 (one day after CrowdStrike’s announcement of the DNC hack by ‘Russia’), there has been a widespread consensus that Guccifer 2 was a Russian deception operation, with only a few skeptics (e.g., Jeffrey Carr questioning evidence but not necessarily conclusion, Adam Carter challenging attribution).

Perhaps the most prevalent argument in attribution has been the presence of ‘Russian’ metadata in documents included in Guccifer 2’s original post – the theory being that the ‘Russian’ metadata was left by mistake. I’ve looked at lots of metadata both in connection with Climategate and more recently in connection with the DNC hack, and, in my opinion, the chances of this metadata being left by mistake is zero. Precisely what it means is a big puzzle though.”

Drip, drip, the truth leaks out. Eventually it should drown the witch...


Hillary Clinton campaign, DNC accused of 'corrupt' money scheme in new FEC complaint

Did Clinton break the law with 'takeover' of DNC? A new legal complaint filed with the Federal Election Commission alleges that the Hillary Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee used state chapters as strawmen to circumvent campaign donation limits and laundered the money back to her campaign.

The Committee to Defend the President, a political action committee, filed its complaint with the FEC on Monday with the allegations that the Hillary Victory Fund (HVF) solicited cash from big-name donors, including Calvin Klein and “Family Guy” creator Seth MacFarlane -- money that was allegedly sent through state chapters and back to the DNC before ending up with the Clinton campaign.

Officials with the committee said their filing was spurred by their own analysis of FEC reports, where they said they discovered the HVF either never transferred the money to state chapters and back to the DNC, or did so without the state chapters having actual control.

“What we have found, people need to see,” Ted Harvey, chairman of the CDP which emerged from the now-defunct Stop Hillary PAC, told Fox News. “I think it’s important that the American public has an understanding of how corrupt this campaign system was and that they were doing anything they could to secure the nomination in her favor.”

In its complaint, the CDP alleges that about $84 million was funneled illegally from the DNC through state party chapters and back into the war chest of the Clinton campaign.

“Apparently the DNC’s response to the [Supreme Court] ruling was, ‘Hold my Beer.’”

“Based on publicly available FEC records, repeatedly throughout the 2016 presidential campaign, HVF would purportedly transfer funds to its constituent political committees, which included between 34 and 40 state parties,” reads a passage from a copy of the complaint reviewed by Fox News. “On the very same day each of these transfers supposedly occurred, or occasionally the very next day, every single one of those state parties purportedly contributed all of those funds to the DNC.”

CDP counsel Dan Backer said the scheme was a flagrant violation of a Supreme Court ruling that determined such moves were illegal -- and broke FEC campaign contribution rules which state that an individual can contribute only $2,700 directly to a presidential campaign.

“Apparently the DNC’s response to the ruling was, ‘Hold my Beer,’” he said, referring to a phrase from an Internet meme. “These donations were specifically earmarked for the DNC and the campaign committee.”

Backer continued, “It’s not entirely clear if they transferred the money to the state parties to begin with, and if they never had control of the money, it’s not a contribution. It’s an earmark. If the money is in control of the candidate, then it is a contribution to them.”

Backer reiterated a point from the complaint -- that the Supreme Court first recognized these practices were illegal when it ruled in a 2014 case involving Shaun McCutcheon, a businessman and electrical engineer from suburban Birmingham, Ala., who created the Conservative Action Fund PAC. McCutcheon filed suit against the FEC challenging federal campaign contribution limits. It was Backer who assisted in filing the suit.

“This is exactly the scenario that they said would occur,” Backer says. “They were so brazen about it yet so sloppy.”

The new complaint filed against the FEC said previous reports showed a series of transactions in which the HVF disbursed contributions to its state party committee members -- and they would receive the funds on the same day. The HVF would also allegedly disburse funds to up to 40 state parties at the same time, and those parties would send the money back within 24 hours.

“It appears virtually every single disbursement from HVF to a state party resulted in an immediate transfer of the same amount of funds from the state party to the DNC,” reads another passage from the complaint. “Over 99% of funds transferred through HVF to state parties wound up at the DNC.”

Officials for the DNC did not return requests for comment when contacted by Fox News.

The allegations seem to echo claims by former DNC chair Donna Brazile while promoting her book earlier this year.

Katherine Timpf reports from the event aimed at venting frustration on the anniversary of the 2016 election.
In her 2017 book “Hacks,” Brazile recounts how she saw the money being moved.

“Individuals who had maxed out their $2,700 contribution limit to the campaign could write an additional check for $353,400 to the Hillary Victory Fund—that figure represented $10,000 to each of the 32 states’ parties who were part of the Victory Fund agreement—$320,000—and $33,400 to the DNC,” reads a passage from the book. “The money would be deposited in the states first, and transferred to the DNC shortly after that. Money in the battleground states usually stayed in that state, but all the other states funneled that money directly to the DNC, which quickly transferred the money to [Clinton campaign headquarters in] Brooklyn.”

Brazile took issue with this, saying that it signified the victory fund was going to Clinton before she received the nomination.

A DNC statement issued last month in response to her claims said: "Joint fundraising committees were created ... in attempt to raise the general election funds needed to win in 2016. Clinton was the only candidate who raised money for the party through her joint fundraising committee with the DNC, which would benefit any candidate coming out of the presidential primary process."

Backer says the committee hopes its findings will spur campaign finance reform and an investigation by the Department of Justice.

“It’s really cut and dry,” he says, “but it shouldn’t matter that it was Hillary Clinton and the DNC that did this. The law was broken. It doesn’t matter who did it.”

http://www.foxnews.com/politic...w-fec-complaint.html