quote:

Originally posted by ScreamingCockatoo:

THIS is a big reason Kamalamamadingdong lost.
NORMAL people are fed up. Including NORMAL gays.(yes there are many republican gays)
Damn as how condescending that twit is.

100%. I found this gay woman speaking about just this at 11:30.

https://youtu.be/p6sxcBub85s?si=XuMM3GJ48X_sWtIV

It’s perhaps the best explanation I’ve listened to concerning this. I’d happily buy this woman a beer.

From ‘Women’ to ‘Birthing Persons’ to… ‘Vaginally Presenting?!’

https://thenationalpulse.com/2...or-men-just-dropped/

An ongoing legal fight in Washington State over whether men are allowed into a women’s nude spa has produced a new, politically correct term for biological males. “People who are not vaginally presenting” was used by an attorney to describe individuals with biological male genitalia—rather than simply recognizing them as a ‘male’ or ‘man.

’Currently before the federal Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, the case Olympus Spa v. Armstrong stems from a ruling by the Washington State Human Rights Commission, which found that Haven Wilvich, a man, was unlawfully barred from entering the traditional Korean spa. The spa owners implemented a “female-only policy” as patrons are allowed to enter the spa in the nude, though they did make an accommodation for post-operative transgender ‘females.’ Olympus Spa argues that the rule is “essential for the safety, legal protection, and well-being of our customers.”

The Ninth Circuit appears split on whether Olympus Spa has the right to bar men from its establishment, with one of the appellate judges likening the policy to a ‘whites-only’ policy. “If you have a law that says ‘white applicants only,’ this is ‘biological women entrance only.’ It seems to me they’re quite parallel there,” Judge M. Margaret McKeown argued during a hearing on Monday. “And you can’t have ‘white people only’ come into my restaurant, and then you say, ‘Well, no, we have a religious, spiritual nature to our restaurant, and when you get there, we serve you special food.’ This seems quite different.”

There may be hope yet…

“ Rep. Seth Moulton (D-Mass.), a five-term congressman who previously has voted with most other Democrats to safeguard transgender rights, touched off a firestorm of criticism when he railed against Democratic support for transgender athletes in women’s sports in an interview with The New York Times…

“‘Democrats spend way too much time trying not to offend anyone rather than being brutally honest about the challenges many Americans face,’ Moulton said. ‘I have two little girls, I don’t want them getting run over on a playing field by a male or formerly male athlete, but as a Democrat I’m supposed to be afraid to say that.’ Massachusetts Democrats widely panned Moulton’s remarks.” The Hill”

Maybe I am overly optimistic, but I think anyone that has girl children would object to a person on whatever self-described gender displaying a penis in a women’s/ girls locker room!

I grew up in Texas in the 1950’s; that behavior would have been met with extreme displeasure and the ‘dick’ would be fortunate if the police took him away while he could still breath.

This is the hill the dems have chose to die on.

Don't interrupt your enemy while they are making a mistake.