Go ![]() | New ![]() | Find ![]() | Notify ![]() | Tools ![]() | Reply ![]() | ![]() |
Team Apathy |
Well, when the day comes where I am capable of pushing the limits of the hardware, I'll have to get a hardware upgrade! Darn! ![]() I think for now it is safe to assume that the platform is more capable of consistency than I am... so... more practice! I just worked up some dot targets to try out... I made simple red dots with a black outline. They are sized to print out on a standard printer resulting in dots that are 1 MOA at the marked distance. For now I made 4 versions... 25 yards, 50 yards, 75 yards, and 100 yard. Look good to you for simple dot practice like you suggest? TARGET HERE | |||
|
Freethinker |
That’s similar to the targets I’ve developed for myself. I don’t have a color printer, but I like the red center. The only modification I’d consider is putting a crosshair or even just a black dot in the center of each circle. I found that having a specific well-defined aiming point helps me get accurate results. ![]() ► 6.0/94.0 “To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead.” — Thomas Paine | |||
|
Team Apathy |
Oh that is a good point (pun intended)... I'll make a quick mod. Here is an updated versionThis message has been edited. Last edited by: thumperfbc, | |||
|
Member |
I like the revised dots better than the original. I find that my vision is better with yellow than red as an aim point. I also suspect that many scopes produce a sharper image in the yellow part of the visible spectrum than the red part. The small red dot offers a more precise aiming point, especially if you don't have to compensate for wind drift. IMO consider reducing the number of dots per page. Your brain & vision may be fine with the current setup, but I've tried similar dot density targets and I have struggled a bit. Give it a try first, but I suspect you will be happier with about half the current dot density per page. Should you decide to make the change, please post your new targets. I have no qualms in stating that "I will steal shamelessly from others" -- a term a prior company's Chief Officers used when they saw great ideas from other folks. I often use solid black dots for dot drills. Right up front, I'll state that solid black dots suck with black reticles. But it's a game my instructors & mentors have played for a long time. When we can consistently center punch solid black dots, all the shooting fundamentals are working. | |||
|
Team Apathy |
Here, I spent some time this morning making some new versions (all other version remain on the server as well). In addition to reducing the density of some distances, I also fixed a few more misalignments and added row and column labels. Let me know if these look better. If I can find a few hours this weekend I'll give them a whirl too. Version 3This message has been edited. Last edited by: thumperfbc, | |||
|
Member |
The newest versions are nice. I tried v2 at 50 yards yesterday. The dot density seemed fine. The day at the ranch didn't start well. Came close to getting the pickup stuck in a snowdrift. Ran out of gas, located a couple gallons in a carrier, and had enough to get me into town for a fillup. Then forgot to bring a target backer. I had to shoot from a section of a small-ish tree trunk, stood up on end, with the target duck taped to the log. I couldn't see the outer columns, so that's why I shot the middle 3 columns. And after burning about 1.5 tanks of fuel through my Stihl chainsaws. Breezes of 0-5 mph from my right. JBM says 5mph drift is about .5" -- the width of the dots. I had some challenges guessing the wind. Prone, bipod, rear bag. Ground surface was mostly frozen, with pine needles on top. Some sheepdip shots, some decent shots. I felt rusty. You can see I was struggling with vertical at the start. Cold shooter sucks. The bottom rows show better vertical, with most of my issues resulting from wind drift. ![]() | |||
|
Member |
More dots, this time at 75 yards. The morning started cold and dead calm. After 2 tanks of fuel burned in a Stihl chainsaw and a snack, it was time to shoot. Of course a breeze started. I couldn't feel it at my shooting location in the trees, but it was there in the open -- the last 40-50 yards to the target. Headwinds of 0-4 mph, mainly from my 12 o'clock, but switching rapidly from 10:30 to 1:30. During the second row I began reading wind from the mirage off a snowbank behind the target. I feel I got better reading the wind with subsequent & lower rows. JBM says the wind drift could have been 3/4" to 1" at maximum estimated winds. This time I had a pretty solid shooting position, as the ground wasn't frozen under my bipod legs. I could see all my impacts as they occurred. I could almost always predict the impact location by how I pressed the trigger, and by how the sights moved. Thus, I could almost always determine if a miss was from my shooting technique, my wind call, or a bad round. As I see it: - 4 bad wind calls - 2 high pulls - 1 low impact from bad ammo. This round sounded quieter than the others, too. BTW, my common miss is a high flyer. It comes from too much downward cheek pressure on the stock and a lazy squeeze on the rear bag. The contrast on these targets is nice. A good combo of red aiming dot, yellow outer, and black outline. I often aimed at the 3 or 9 o'clock black edge, and hoped that my wind call would result in the impact striking near the red center. ![]() | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 2 3 4 5 |
![]() | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
|