SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  SIG Pistols    P320 or P365 for +P+ limited use?
Page 1 2 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
P320 or P365 for +P+ limited use? Login/Join 
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by NavyGuy:
I don't know why people jones for extra-supper power for defense. I feel perfectly comfortable with standard pressure commercial defense rounds. I shoot them better and although thankfully I've I haven't been confronted with a need to shoot a bad guy, I have a hard time believing an extra 60 or so FTS would make a difference. But hey load what you feel comfortable with.

Agree with you - GENERALLY.

However, when I bought my Federal 9BPLE 115 +P+ they were HALF the price of bonded core. Bought a bunch. Reasons:

1) Price as mentioned above.

2) They weren't just +P+. The 9BPLE was used over 25 years by a large number of LEA's. Good track record of actual shootings. I will not carry boutique ammo that has no track record of numerous ACTUAL shootings. I'm not a ballistic gel guy. Just old I guess.

3) Ayoob spoke highly of them. Whether you follow Mas or not, he knows a Helluva lot more about performance of rounds used in law enforcement circles than I do. He obviously is not at liberty to share details with us.

4) Before I got my nines, I shot .357 Mag, .45 ACP and .40 S&W over a 40 year period. IMHO, the recoil of 9mm +P+ is LESS than those cartridges, even at age 80.

5) I'm a civilian. Generally, the bonded core features ARE important for LEA environments. With me, it's most likely a stand up gunfight in the open with a perp who wants my wallet, car or just feels like killing somebody.

Hope this helps.


______________________
An expert is one who knows more and more about less and less until he knows absolutely everything about nothing. --Nicholas Murray Butler
 
Posts: 4596 | Location: Pennsylvania | Registered: June 29, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Lost
Picture of kkina
posted Hide Post
^I also agree generally. That stated, I think there are reasons for +P:

External ballistics: the faster the round, the flatter the trajectory. I often shoot at longer ranges, and it helps when I don’t need to figure the correct holdover.

Terminal ballistics: higher velocities support bullet expansion for a more reliable defense round.

Consistency: I shoot a lot of 9mm NATO, which is a fairly hot round though not marketed as a +P cartridge. It’s again convenient not having to adjust to a slower, less powerful round.



ACCU-STRUT FOR MINI-14
"First, Eyes."
 
Posts: 15126 | Location: SF Bay Area | Registered: December 11, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
A teetotaling
beer aficionado
Picture of NavyGuy
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by kkina:
^I also agree generally. That stated, I think there are reasons for +P:

External ballistics: the faster the round, the flatter the trajectory. I often shoot at longer ranges, and it helps when I don’t need to figure the correct holdover.

Terminal ballistics: higher velocities support bullet expansion for a more reliable defense round.

Consistency: I shoot a lot of 9mm NATO, which is a fairly hot round though not marketed as a +P cartridge. It’s again convenient not having to adjust to a slower, less powerful round.


Of course all you have said it technically correct if we're talking about shooting at the range at extended distances, or the very rare occurrence of the guy shooting the bad guy at 40 yards. Reality is most self defense shootings are far less. Like 5 yards. Bullet drop has zero impact at those distances. I guess you need to decide what's important. .1 bullet drop at defense distances, shotablilty, or fun at the range at long distance. Me, my carry guns are for protection. A guy 25 yards away doesn't scare me much unless he's got an AR or some such trained on me.



Men fight for liberty and win it with hard knocks. Their children, brought up easy, let it slip away again, poor fools. And their grandchildren are once more slaves.

-D.H. Lawrence
 
Posts: 11073 | Location: Fort Worth, Texas | Registered: February 07, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Experienced Slacker
posted Hide Post
If carrying a flame thrower or RPG was practical and not frowned upon I would do that.

If either could be easily concealed I would do that.

I'm not much in a windstorm, so I need easily concealed weapons and I like them to be as close to the aforementioned options as possible.
 
Posts: 7078 | Registered: May 12, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Lost
Picture of kkina
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by NavyGuy:
Of course all you have said it technically correct if we're talking about shooting at the range at extended distances, or the very rare occurrence of the guy shooting the bad guy at 40 yards. Reality is most self defense shootings are far less. Like 5 yards. Bullet drop has zero impact at those distances. I guess you need to decide what's important. .1 bullet drop at defense distances, shotablilty, or fun at the range at long distance. Me, my carry guns are for protection. A guy 25 yards away doesn't scare me much unless he's got an AR or some such trained on me.

Makes sense.



ACCU-STRUT FOR MINI-14
"First, Eyes."
 
Posts: 15126 | Location: SF Bay Area | Registered: December 11, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Experienced Slacker
posted Hide Post
Received the P320 sub compact kit a few days ago and took it shooting, so here's a range report/update.

Without prior cleaning, firing 150 rounds of blazer 115gr. and 10 rounds of the Underwood 90gr. +P+ using both the provided 12rd mag, as well as a 17rd full size mag, resulted in 0 malfunctions. Groups were formed where the front sight's dot covered the target out to 10 yards.

The Underwood ammo was definitely hotter, but the primers still had a bit of round edge showing. I don't think the pistol minded them at all.

TL/DR: It will do just fine.
 
Posts: 7078 | Registered: May 12, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
I know a lot of folks say the extra fps isn’t worthwhile, but, out of curiosity —
For those of you who said you wouldn’t shoot +P+ out of a 365, would you feel more comfortable shooting it out of a G43?
 
Posts: 700 | Location: Baltimore, MD | Registered: March 29, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Don't Panic
Picture of joel9507
posted Hide Post
quote:

wouldn’t shoot +P+ out of a 365, would you feel more comfortable shooting it out of a G43?

"+P+" is not a number, it's a description. There is no upper bound.

Any and every pressure greater than SAAMI standards for "+P" gets called "+P+". 1% over? 50% over? Same designation. In other words, all that designation means is "Terra incognita."

What they ought to do is have all ammo designed over SAAMI standards list the actual pressure on the box, in large bold type. THAT, you could check against your firearm's specs and/or discuss with the maker.
 
Posts: 14554 | Location: North Carolina | Registered: October 15, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Experienced Slacker
posted Hide Post


I've fired +P from a Glock with no ill effects, but their lack of a fully supported chamber gives me more reason for pause than the SIG design.

Also, I wouldn't use the word "comfortable" to describe shooting +P+ from such a pistol anyway. Wink
 
Posts: 7078 | Registered: May 12, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Raptorman
Picture of Mars_Attacks
posted Hide Post
Just post the pictures when you grenade it.


____________________________

Eeewwww, don't touch it!
Here, poke at it with this stick.
 
Posts: 33256 | Location: North, GA | Registered: October 09, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  SIG Pistols    P320 or P365 for +P+ limited use?

© SIGforum 2022