SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  SIG Pistols    Is mag capacity the current "0-60mph" of the gun world?
Page 1 2 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Is mag capacity the current "0-60mph" of the gun world? Login/Join 
Imagination and focus
become reality
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Nick42:
The average number of pistol round hits to incapacitate a threat is more than two for 9mm and .45 ACP, per a study I read some time ago. That's hits, not shots, under stress, etc. If there are multiple threats, you can do the math. LE knows this.

Don't prepare for the average case, but for a worse case.


If I recall correctly, FBI statistics from about 10 years ago showed that it took 2.1 rounds of 45, 2.6 rounds of 40 and 2.9 rounds of 9mm to incapacitate a threat. So shoot at least three times. Smile
 
Posts: 6769 | Location: Northwest Indiana | Registered: August 15, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
E tan e epi tas
Picture of cslinger
posted Hide Post
Ammo is expensive. I am not using that .9 of a round unless I have to. Razz


"Guns are tools. The only weapon ever created was man."
 
Posts: 7948 | Location: On the water | Registered: July 25, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of elberettas
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by cslinger:
Ammo is expensive. I am not using that .9 of a round unless I have to. Razz


I was just reminded of that scene in "Harley Davidson and The Marlboro Man."
 
Posts: 1961 | Location: San Diego, CA | Registered: July 02, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Sigforum K9 handler
Picture of jljones
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Ogie:
quote:
Originally posted by Nick42:
The average number of pistol round hits to incapacitate a threat is more than two for 9mm and .45 ACP, per a study I read some time ago. That's hits, not shots, under stress, etc. If there are multiple threats, you can do the math. LE knows this.

Don't prepare for the average case, but for a worse case.


If I recall correctly, FBI statistics from about 10 years ago showed that it took 2.1 rounds of 45, 2.6 rounds of 40 and 2.9 rounds of 9mm to incapacitate a threat. So shoot at least three times. Smile


Could anyone post a link to this? It gets handed down from person to person, but like Bigfoot, no one can actually prove they have seen it.




www.opspectraining.com

"It's a bold strategy, Cotton. Let's see if it works out for them"



 
Posts: 37239 | Location: Logical | Registered: September 12, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
E tan e epi tas
Picture of cslinger
posted Hide Post
quote:
Could anyone post a link to this? It gets handed down from person to person, but like Bigfoot, no one can actually prove they have seen it.


I've never seen this either. The only one that I've heard of, but never run down, that I THINK does have available documentation is that the NYPD has averaged around 8 shots across the board, which seems like a more realistic number. (statistically speaking, not saying there are not bullet sponges out there who've taken double that or more)


"Guns are tools. The only weapon ever created was man."
 
Posts: 7948 | Location: On the water | Registered: July 25, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
E tan e epi tas
Picture of cslinger
posted Hide Post
quote:
I was just reminded of that scene in "Harley Davidson and The Marlboro Man."


"THAT HURT!! HARLEY!!!"

I love this moving. That Ruger in 454 Casull was so random. Big Grin


"Guns are tools. The only weapon ever created was man."
 
Posts: 7948 | Location: On the water | Registered: July 25, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Austin228
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by jljones:
quote:
Originally posted by Nickelsig229:
No, they dump mags until whoever they are shooting at isn't moving and they can safely disarm them.


Understand that this is not a good metric. Most cops can’t shoot. Most agencies are still training the same methods they did in the 1960s. Most smaller agencies train very little beyond shooting state mandated qualifications. Training and ammo costs money.

Most cops aren’t gun guys. We have a cultural problem in LE where hard skills are less important than learning about community oriented policing topics. Then when they mag dump, we act all surprised.

The culture is changing and there are a lot of red shirts out there putting out practical shooting training at the agency level.



Agree with this 100%, most of the special agents I work with aren't gun guys either.

Most just do their yearly qualification.

I think TV/movies have given people a false idea of what LEO's are like, most are great investigators, not firearms experts (or even long time amateurs/hobbyists).

I have met the few who train everyone else and they are experts, often they are also contractors.
 
Posts: 1505 | Location: Austin, TX | Registered: March 19, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Green Mountain Boy
Picture of Jus228
posted Hide Post
For me there does have to be a balance. If the gun is too big or too heavy I’m more likely to leave it home where it does me no good. I try to stick with something I’m always going to have on me. Most of the time that’s a G42 with 7rds in it and a spare mag. I can even carry it in the elastic waistband of exercise shorts on the mountain bike or just hiking in the woods and it just dissapears on me. I always have something bigger with A LOT more capacity in the truck, worst case I fight my way to that and use to evade.


!~God Bless the U.S. Military~!

If the world didn't suck, we'd all fall off

Light travels faster than sound, this is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak
 
Posts: 5565 | Location: Vermont | Registered: March 02, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Quit staring at my wife's Butt
Picture of XLT
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by jljones:
quote:
Originally posted by 12131:
quote:
As a civilian if you need more than 4-5 you have done a lot wrong ( situational awareness, not avoiding bad neighborhoods etc)

Here we go again with this tired old saying. This is a new century, where shit can happen to you anytime anywhere, by multiple armed thugs.



Indeed. The past few years has taught us a thing or two, if we’ve been willing to pay attention.

Carry capacity is and always will be a series of trade offs that YOU have to be comfortable with. I used to have a minimum of 31 rounds. In the last few months it has dropped to 21. The slim line Glocks are just so comfortable, and I get really decent performance.

I have become a really big fan of scaling. I can scale the 48 to 31 rounds by adding Shield arms mags. I can add a Taran extension to one and have a 20 round reload. Or I can swap to a 19. Did I mention how I like the 48 (and the 43x) and how easy they are to carry. My big concern with smaller guns is losing practical speed and accuracy. With the 48, I give very little up.

It’s a compromise and a choice.



have you ever tried the 365 legion? I too was a big fan of the 48 and 43x with shield mags until I shot the legion now both my 43x and 48 have been sold, I also have a 365 tac ops and like it allot but the legion gets way more use.
 
Posts: 5698 | Registered: February 09, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Say, if the Hi-Point were to be as equally ultra reliable as the G19, the 92FS or the P228, why would I want to even consider it, when the others are much better looking.

That brick of a Hi-Point is probably more effective after you're out of ammo and then have to use it as a throwing weapon. Big Grin

More ammo at one's disposal is never a bad thing. Words to survive by.


-MG
 
Posts: 2251 | Location: The commie, rainy side of WA | Registered: April 19, 2020Reply With QuoteReport This Post
His diet consists of black
coffee, and sarcasm.
Picture of egregore
posted Hide Post
Within reason (you don't want the gun so large as to be unwieldy), there's no such thing as too much ammunition. There is a virtual glut on the market of compact and subcompact 9mm pistols for a reason.
 
Posts: 28846 | Location: Johnson City, TN | Registered: April 28, 2012Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Blackwater
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by jljones:

Indeed. The past few years has taught us a thing or two, if we’ve been willing to pay attention.

Carry capacity is and always will be a series of trade offs that YOU have to be comfortable with. I used to have a minimum of 31 rounds. In the last few months it has dropped to 21. The slim line Glocks are just so comfortable, and I get really decent performance.

I have become a really big fan of scaling. I can scale the 48 to 31 rounds by adding Shield arms mags. I can add a Taran extension to one and have a 20 round reload. Or I can swap to a 19. Did I mention how I like the 48 (and the 43x) and how easy they are to carry. My big concern with smaller guns is losing practical speed and accuracy. With the 48, I give very little up.

It’s a compromise and a choice.


The 43x is really my go to for carry. It may be just me, but even with 2 additional mags in pockets it feels MUCH lighter than the P365XL w/12 or any comparable size gun and shoots better to boot. I usually have 1 extra mag for 21 rounds, but have another spare in the console for 31. The overall package is so nice and light. I like the P365X Macro, but even the G19 felt lighter/smaller when carrying, esp when adding additional mags.


Joe
Back in Tx.
 
Posts: 2551 | Location: Texas | Registered: October 28, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
I find I tend to carry my Colt King Cobra 357 an awful lot now a days. It packs a punch, holds 6 rounds and is very discreet. Now if I go into "sketchy areas" I carry my Sig P226 which holds 19 rounds with the flush fit Mec-car mag.


Jeeps...guns...German Shepherds!
 
Posts: 96 | Location: Twin Cities Minnesota | Registered: September 29, 2021Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  SIG Pistols    Is mag capacity the current "0-60mph" of the gun world?

© SIGforum 2024