Member
| Reliability first. Then, weight and accuracy. |
| | |
Member
| The deal breaker for me is if I wasn't able to fit the gun in my pocket. The Sig p365 is one of the guns that fulfills that. The only problem is the 365 doesn't fit my hand, I sold one because of that. But I'm finding there are options coming so this problem I have with the 365 will be solved. When that happens I will be back in the market for the 365 for sure....A gun I have that I think is better than the 365 is the Kimber R7 Mako a really good gun better trigger much better grip but is a little larger than I want for CC all the time.. |
| | |
Member
| quote: Originally posted by pedropcola:
Nope, still being a dick. It’s math and physiology. That’s it. If it groups X at ten yards you do the math and with the same hold/skills/etc the group will open up a mathematically repeatable amount. 27 yards isn’t ballistically significant so it literally is as simple as what I just said. Mechanical accuracy at 10 yards can predict to small decimal places how much that gun will open up at 27 yards. So a cloverleaf at 10 will be a bigger and mathematically predictable cloverleaf at 27 yards.
I need it more accurate. Oh ok gunslinger.
Simms class where they film everything had an observation about time, distance and cover. People used different techniques at different ranges. The greater the time distance and cover the more likely to shooter was to use his sights and marksmanship techniques.
DPR
|
| | |
