SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  SIG Pistols    In wildly unpredictable move, S&W new j-frame bodyguard 2.0
Page 1 2 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
In wildly unpredictable move, S&W new j-frame bodyguard 2.0 Login/Join 
Honky Lips
Picture of FenderBender
posted


_____________________________________________
Proverbs 3:31 "Envy thou not the oppressor, and choose none of his ways."
 
Posts: 9274 | Location: Great Basin | Registered: July 24, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
No, not like
Bill Clinton
Picture of BigSwede
posted Hide Post
So, just updated sights?



My wife and daughter picked the Bodyguard for carry, they love them


 
Posts: 6783 | Location: GA | Registered: September 23, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
E tan e epi tas
Picture of cslinger
posted Hide Post
Easy change, keeps them on the hype train and makes folks look at the brand on the tubes and the grames etc. Less about the gun more about the marketing IMO.


Take Care, Shoot Safe,
Chris
 
Posts: 8635 | Location: On the water | Registered: July 25, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Been out a while. Cylinder turns the wrong way, awkward top cylinder latch, but it has a LASER.
 
Posts: 3486 | Location: Florence, Alabama, USA | Registered: July 05, 2001Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Peace through
superior firepower
Picture of parabellum
posted Hide Post
ick
 
Posts: 114129 | Registered: January 20, 2000Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Prepared for the Worst, Providing the Best
Picture of 92fstech
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by parabellum:
ick


I have zero personal experience with the polymer Bodyguard revolvers. They may very well be wonderful guns. But this is exactly what comes to mind every time I see one.


-----------------------------------------------------------

Any comments made by this poster are my own and do not reflect the views or opinions of my employer.
 
Posts: 11803 | Location: In the Cornfields | Registered: May 25, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of 4MUL8R
posted Hide Post
Ruger LCR like


-------
Trying to simplify my life...
 
Posts: 6110 | Location: Commonwealth of Virginia | Registered: January 15, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of 1KPerDay
posted Hide Post
So not only are all S&W guns now named the M&P, we have multiple Bodyguard 2.0s also.

That's a great idea


---------------------------
My hovercraft is full of eels.
 
Posts: 3709 | Registered: February 27, 2013Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Shoot gun,
get check
Picture of Scoobaru
posted Hide Post
I have had the misfortune to shoot the first version. It feels nothing like a Smith & Wesson to me. The trigger was awful, it was not accurate, and it feels cheap as hell. As Para puts it...


Ick.



 
Posts: 649 | Location: The pointy part of Nevada | Registered: March 03, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of wrightd
posted Hide Post
Ick was my first thought as well, but can't claim it since Para beat me to it.




Lover of the US Constitution
Wile E. Coyote School of DIY Disaster
 
Posts: 9953 | Location: Nowhere the constitution is not honored | Registered: February 01, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Prepared for the Worst, Providing the Best
Picture of 92fstech
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 1KPerDay:
So not only are all S&W guns now named the M&P, we have multiple Bodyguard 2.0s also.

That's a great idea


Yep. And they're chambered in .38 Special and .380...two calibers that casual gun owners are already prone to confuse. They've also got the Shield, Shield+, ShieldX, etc...its like they're intentionally trying to make it confusing.


-----------------------------------------------------------

Any comments made by this poster are my own and do not reflect the views or opinions of my employer.
 
Posts: 11803 | Location: In the Cornfields | Registered: May 25, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Fighting the good fight
Picture of RogueJSK
posted Hide Post


I guess I see what they were going for, addressing some of the main complaints of the J frame like the heavy trigger pull and nub sights, plus removing the lock and adding in an ambi cylinder release.

But in a world where micro compact 9mms exist that are the same size or smaller, with even better sights, an even better trigger, better capacity, easier reloads, and a more potent round, I still think it'll be a hard sell.

So now they have new buyers who won't want it when they can have a micro 9, and as evidenced by the sentiment here, old J frame fans who won't buy it because it's not what they know.

Alienating both new and old buyers is not exactly a recipe for sales success.

Perhaps it's time to simply let the J frame fade into history, rather than straining to try to keep it relevant in modern times.
 
Posts: 35191 | Location: Northwest Arkansas | Registered: January 06, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of RichardC
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by RogueJSK:

Perhaps it's time to simply let the J frame fade into history, rather than straining to try to keep it relevant in modern times.


'Taint.
 
Posts: 17334 | Location: Florida | Registered: June 23, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Fighting the good fight
Picture of RogueJSK
posted Hide Post


Big Grin
 
Posts: 35191 | Location: Northwest Arkansas | Registered: January 06, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Prepared for the Worst, Providing the Best
Picture of 92fstech
posted Hide Post
quote:
Perhaps it's time to simply let the J frame fade into history, rather than straining to try to keep it relevant in modern times.


Blasphemy!!!

But this is the way to do it, not that fugly plastic thing...



-----------------------------------------------------------

Any comments made by this poster are my own and do not reflect the views or opinions of my employer.
 
Posts: 11803 | Location: In the Cornfields | Registered: May 25, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Jack of All Trades,
Master of Nothing
Picture of 2000Z-71
posted Hide Post
I’ll agree with the, “Ick”. Kinda looks like the product of a hot sweaty night with a bottle of Boone’s Farm and a Ruger LCR and a Keltec. It just looks cheap. I’ve been intrigued every now and then by the Ruger LCR but this new one from Smith looks like it’s cobbled together, it just doesn’t look like an integrated design.

I do think that revolvers can be modernized, but this ain’t it. I like the idea behind the UC series by Smith of adding better sights and a better trigger. I have nothing against a polymer grip frame, but this just looks cheap and added on. I also like what Lipsey’s has done with bringing back the Night Guard series. Lightweight material in a revolver that’s more shootable than a j-frame. I’ve got my name in with my LGS for a 386 and I’m really hoping they bring back the 310 Night Gaurd.




My daughter can deflate your daughter's soccer ball.
 
Posts: 12302 | Location: Eagle River, AK | Registered: September 12, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Thank you
Very little
Picture of HRK
posted Hide Post
Had a Ruger LCR I pocket carried for a while, just didn't care for the way you had to reset the trigger, there is no short reset you had to be sure you let the trigger back out all the way.
 
Posts: 27606 | Location: Gunshine State | Registered: November 07, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of SigSentry
posted Hide Post
I'm good.

 
Posts: 3880 | Registered: May 30, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
E tan e epi tas
Picture of cslinger
posted Hide Post
quote:
Perhaps it's time to simply let the J frame fade into history, rather than straining to try to keep it relevant in modern times.


You shut your dirty whore mouth!!! Razz. Big Grin

In all seriousness I haven’t carried a J in a while but there are rare occasions where it just works. It looks like Wallet in a pocket and still has a place now and then for me. Not that plastic abomination above of course. Smile


Take Care, Shoot Safe,
Chris
 
Posts: 8635 | Location: On the water | Registered: July 25, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of wrightd
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by RogueJSK:


I guess I see what they were going for, addressing some of the main complaints of the J frame like the heavy trigger pull and nub sights, plus removing the lock and adding in an ambi cylinder release.

But in a world where micro compact 9mms exist that are the same size or smaller, with even better sights, an even better trigger, better capacity, easier reloads, and a more potent round, I still think it'll be a hard sell.

So now they have new buyers who won't want it when they can have a micro 9, and as evidenced by the sentiment here, old J frame fans who won't buy it because it's not what they know.

Alienating both new and old buyers is not exactly a recipe for sales success.

Perhaps it's time to simply let the J frame fade into history, rather than straining to try to keep it relevant in modern times.

For such a fine and revolutionary new gun, they forgot to label the most important part, the"snoot", where the boolit comes out.




Lover of the US Constitution
Wile E. Coyote School of DIY Disaster
 
Posts: 9953 | Location: Nowhere the constitution is not honored | Registered: February 01, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  SIG Pistols    In wildly unpredictable move, S&W new j-frame bodyguard 2.0

© SIGforum 2026