Go ![]() | New ![]() | Find ![]() | Notify ![]() | Tools ![]() | Reply ![]() | ![]() |
Member |
It's a change for the positive as I see it. I've not particularly liked the extended base plate solutions. So many of these designs took the micro compact G43 and turned it into something as tall as a G19. After having a Pearce extension (on a G23 mag) deconstruct on a range visit, I really don't trust any of the poly extensions, though I will admit the Vickers/Tango Down plates that I've run on a couple of my G43 mags have yet to dislodge themselves in a couple of years of range use. But it's still about trust, and I'd not been able to reach that point before I parked my G43 in the safe and switched to the P365 as my secondary carry option. And then there's the relative costs, especially with the alloy designs. Adding a couple of extra rounds using Taran bases to two magazines is like buying three new factory six-rounders. Sure they're still small mags but the extension math just never made much financial sense to me. 18 more rounds vs 4. Just work on fast reloads...I guess... I'm still surprised at how popular the G43 is. We still sell a lot of them, even AFTER the customer handles the G43X and is told about the clear capacity advantages of the newer design. Must be the J-Frame 'it-only-takes-one-shot' mentality. ![]() -MG | |||
|
I kneel for my God, and I stand for my flag |
We get it, you won't be buying any. Good for you. | |||
|
Member |
I'm definitely in. I felt the lack of firepower with the original 43 mags, and eventually went to a 48 for most carry. But with the magguts +2, I've been carrying the 43 a lot more. Same capacity as the classic 9mm's -- Luger, P38, P210, P6, P7, M39, etc. I do like the firepower of the 48/43x, but with a techna-clip, the 43 disappears IWB like nothing I've ever used. 9-round mags will firmly plant the little 43 into the realm of "firepower just isn't an issue." | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 2 |
![]() | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
|