SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  SIG Pistols    The Sig P320 and discharges.
Page 1 ... 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 ... 93
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
The Sig P320 and discharges. Login/Join 
Down the Rabbit Hole
Picture of Jupiter
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by sigfreund:
The high rate of claimed “uncommanded” discharges certainly got us here, but to assume that all or even any of the claims were valid is a perfect example of the logical fallacy of begging the question.


Do you believe most are simply mistaken regarding the circumstances of the discharges or something else, sigfreund?


Diligentia, Vis, Celeritas

"People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
-- George Orwell

 
Posts: 5542 | Location: North Mississippi | Registered: August 09, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Shall Not Be Infringed
Picture of nhracecraft
posted Hide Post
^^ Perhaps most are simply mistaken regarding what they assume to be the cause.


____________________________________________________________

If Some is Good, and More is Better.....then Too Much, is Just Enough !!
Trump 47....Making America Great Again!
"May Almighty God bless the United States of America" - parabellum 7/26/20
Live Free or Die!
 
Posts: 10864 | Location: New Hampshire | Registered: October 29, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Down the Rabbit Hole
Picture of Jupiter
posted Hide Post
Well...I have a solution that will all but eliminate these discharges. Put those atrocious DAK triggers in those babies. That'll fix 'em. Razz


Diligentia, Vis, Celeritas

"People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
-- George Orwell

 
Posts: 5542 | Location: North Mississippi | Registered: August 09, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Freethinker
Picture of sigfreund
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Jupiter:
Do you believe most are simply mistaken regarding the circumstances of the discharges … sigfreund?

Yes, I do. I cannot and therefore will not attempt to demonstrate that every unintentional discharge of a P320 was due to some causative factor not related to the gun’s design being unsafe. The reason for that is because for most of the claims the specific, and vital details of the incident are not available. For the ones I do know something about, though, I believe there are reasonable explanations that do not involve the possibility that the gun fired without the trigger’s being pulled to move the safety lock out of its blocking position and to release the sear.

One incident involved the pistol’s being dropped into a light bearing holster without a light on the gun, or very likely, simply holstered with a finger on the trigger—as has happened many times with other gun makes. One involved an agency’s issuing P320s and not issuing proper holsters. One involved (what I could see) a gun’s not being holstered properly at all when it happened. One report was that the gun was carried loose in a purse or tote bag with other objects and not in a proper holster.

Others? I simply don’t know, but another thing I point out is that the Loch Ness monster (among many other mythical creatures) has been seen more times than people have claimed that a P320 fired without pulling the trigger. And that doesn’t include all the people who have been abducted by space aliens or seen various miraculous sights. The simple fact is that people very often make false claims about almost any conceivable thing, sometimes because of mistaken perceptions, but especially when they have good reasons to.

An example of the last was very recently when someone was handling a gun carelessly and improperly, and killed a fellow Air Force member unintentionally: “Oh, it was one of those unsafe M18s that went off by itself while it was just lying there in the holster.” Fortunately in that case a competent investigation revealed the truth of the matter and countless YouTube claims dried up like a pee drop in the Atacama Desert; I will predict nevertheless, that that tale will still be repeated years from now.

Oh, one other: Above it was mentioned that during the transition from the M9 to the M17 pistols how difficult it was to get experienced users of the former to keep their fingers off the trigger until on target and preparing the shoot. I doubt many here were around back then or if so, remember what was reported when LE agencies started abandoning revolvers and switching to Glocks: the same thing. Officers were accustomed to putting their fingers on the trigger and even applying significant pressure because nothing would happen. With the Glock, though, that all changed, and the “dingus” didn’t do a thing to prevent it. Plus of course, unintentional discharges with Glocks did not end 40 years ago; no one, however, claims they happen just by themselves—at least not anyone we pay any attention to.

Anyway, now thus endeth the discussion.




6.0/94.0

“I can’t give you brains, but I can give you a diploma.”
— The Wizard of Oz
 
Posts: 49513 | Location: 10,150 Feet Above Sea Level in Commirado | Registered: April 04, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
When you fall, I will be there to catch you -With love, the floor
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Jupiter:
Well...I have a solution that will all but eliminate these discharges. Put those atrocious DAK triggers in those babies. That'll fix 'em. Razz


Not true. Years back we had one officer who let a round go in the then S&W 686. Not to be outdone, he let one go when we transitioned to the S&W 659. Both had trigger pulls in the 12 to 14 pound range. So a mechanical device can always be outdone by a total idiot.


Richard Scalzo
Epping, NH

http://www.bigeastakitarescue.net
 
Posts: 5962 | Location: Epping, NH | Registered: October 16, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Down the Rabbit Hole
Picture of Jupiter
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by rscalzo:
quote:
Originally posted by Jupiter:
Well...I have a solution that will all but eliminate these discharges. Put those atrocious DAK triggers in those babies. That'll fix 'em. Razz


Not true. Years back we had one officer who let a round go in the then S&W 686. Not to be outdone, he let one go when we transitioned to the S&W 659. Both had trigger pulls in the 12 to 14 pound range. So a mechanical device can always be outdone by a total idiot.




So they were firing un-commanded in a holster?


Diligentia, Vis, Celeritas

"People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
-- George Orwell

 
Posts: 5542 | Location: North Mississippi | Registered: August 09, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of mrprovy
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by sigfreund:
quote:
Originally posted by Jupiter:
Do you believe most are simply mistaken regarding the circumstances of the discharges … sigfreund?

Yes, I do. I cannot and therefore will not attempt to demonstrate that every unintentional discharge of a P320 was due to some causative factor not related to the gun’s design being unsafe. The reason for that is because for most of the claims the specific, and vital details of the incident are not available. For the ones I do know something about, though, I believe there are reasonable explanations that do not involve the possibility that the gun fired without the trigger’s being pulled to move the safety lock out of its blocking position and to release the sear.

One incident involved the pistol’s being dropped into a light bearing holster without a light on the gun, or very likely, simply holstered with a finger on the trigger—as has happened many times with other gun makes. One involved an agency’s issuing P320s and not issuing proper holsters. One involved (what I could see) a gun’s not being holstered properly at all when it happened. One report was that the gun was carried loose in a purse or tote bag with other objects and not in a proper holster.

Others? I simply don’t know, but another thing I point out is that the Loch Ness monster (among many other mythical creatures) has been seen more times than people have claimed that a P320 fired without pulling the trigger. And that doesn’t include all the people who have been abducted by space aliens or seen various miraculous sights. The simple fact is that people very often make false claims about almost any conceivable thing, sometimes because of mistaken perceptions, but especially when they have good reasons to.

An example of the last was very recently when someone was handling a gun carelessly and improperly, and killed a fellow Air Force member unintentionally: “Oh, it was one of those unsafe M18s that went off by itself while it was just lying there in the holster.” Fortunately in that case a competent investigation revealed the truth of the matter and countless YouTube claims dried up like a pee drop in the Atacama Desert; I will predict nevertheless, that that tale will still be repeated years from now.

Oh, one other: Above it was mentioned that during the transition from the M9 to the M17 pistols how difficult it was to get experienced users of the former to keep their fingers off the trigger until on target and preparing the shoot. I doubt many here were around back then or if so, remember what was reported when LE agencies started abandoning revolvers and switching to Glocks: the same thing. Officers were accustomed to putting their fingers on the trigger and even applying significant pressure because nothing would happen. With the Glock, though, that all changed, and the “dingus” didn’t do a thing to prevent it. Plus of course, unintentional discharges with Glocks did not end 40 years ago; no one, however, claims they happen just by themselves—at least not anyone we pay any attention to.

Anyway, now thus endeth the discussion.


This video is not firearm related, but is an example of what people perceive. When this woman hit me, she swore up and down that she was in her lane, swore to the cop that she was going straight in the right lane and did not move into my lane. I had video

https://youtu.be/pg3AdzdcW0M


_____________________________________
P220, P225, P226, P228, P229 Legion, P230, P230SL, P239, 38H, P365, P365 faux Legion, M17X, M17 Full, M18, P210 Standard, P210 Carry Custom Works, SP2022
 
Posts: 430 | Location: New Yorkistan | Registered: April 05, 2018Reply With QuoteReport This Post
A Grateful American
Picture of sigmonkey
posted Hide Post
And it looks like she has her phone in her left hand.




"the meaning of life, is to give life meaning" Ani Yehudi אני יהודי Le'olam lo shuv לעולם לא עוד
 
Posts: 46418 | Location: Box 1663 Santa Fe, New Mexico | Registered: December 20, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
I am a transportation engineer. I had a vehicular accident investigation course in college and worked some on scanned police accident reports in my carreer. Often, the person who causes an accident can't give an accurate description of the situation right before the accident because they caused the problem by not paying attention.

Sometimes they will honestly claim and believe something which not only contradicts the testimony of other people and the actual evidence, but defies physics.
 
Posts: 331 | Location: Frankfort, Kentucky.  | Registered: November 26, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
No, just like the 320, something pulled the trigger. They didn’t just go off in their holsters.

It’s getting old to continue repeating that they just “went off” in a holster. You don’t have even a speck of evidence to back up that position.

There has never in the history of firearms been a gun that has had so many people, in so many different ways, tried to get this gun to fire without the trigger being pulled. If you believe the internet, which we aren’t idiots so you shouldn’t, there have been dozens and dozens of these “it just went off” guns yet no one can replicate the event even with those “faulty” guns.

Just say you hate the gun and you think it has gotten too close to the ragged edge of safety. You would have a fine argument there and it would be nearly impossible to win that argument from you. But to just continue repeating the same dumb line over and over makes you sound like a child. Yes, it’s your truth, so by all means stand by that even absent any evidence whatsoever.
 
Posts: 8479 | Location: Florida | Registered: June 18, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Prepared for the Worst, Providing the Best
Picture of 92fstech
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Stickmaker:

Sometimes they will honestly claim and believe something which not only contradicts the testimony of other people and the actual evidence, but defies physics.


I can agree with that. I've seen that play out before in investigations, where either an involved part or eyewitness says something happened a certain way, only to be disproven when we look at the video or other hard data.

Yes, there are a lot of liars out there, but there's also a percentage who legitimately believe something happened a certain way but are simply mistaken. This can be due to distractions, simple lack of awareness, or even just a limited perspective. It's entirely possible to be wrong about the facts while having no malicious intent.

The video GBRS released a while back (and caught a bunch of shit for) about the inadvertent trigger finger incursion when holstering is an entirely plausible scenario, and the shooter might not even realize that they did it. The conscious mind is a funny thing, and I've had to video students before and show them that they're doing a particular thing with their trigger finger to get them to believe me that they're actually doing it.


-----------------------------------------------------------

Any comments made by this poster are my own and do not reflect the views or opinions of my employer.
 
Posts: 11807 | Location: In the Cornfields | Registered: May 25, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Both of the gun clubs I frequent have banned the 320 from pistol competitions. They said up front that it is a liability issue and in the current crazy litigious society that we live in it's just a better choice. I don't have a dog in this fight but can see their point of view. I owned two 320s and tried very hard to like them. But they don't really do anything my gen 5 Glocks can't and now I have a Ruger RXM if I want to mess around with the modularity nonsense.
 
Posts: 4763 | Location: Middletown, PA | Registered: January 09, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of CAR
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by rscalzo:
quote:
Originally posted by Jupiter:
Well...I have a solution that will all but eliminate these discharges. Put those atrocious DAK triggers in those babies. That'll fix 'em. Razz


Not true. Years back we had one officer who let a round go in the then S&W 686. Not to be outdone, he let one go when we transitioned to the S&W 659. Both had trigger pulls in the 12 to 14 pound range. So a mechanical device can always be outdone by a total idiot.


Yep, our local PD had two ADs that I am aware of, one with a S&W Model 10 and the other with a Remington 870 that was still in the cruiser rack (driver later said partner was absent-mindedly fidgeting with the safety and trigger when the gun fired). Both guns were claimed to have "Just gone off by themselves". Roll Eyes

Good thing there was no internet and YouTube in the late 1970's.
 
Posts: 938 | Location: Ohio | Registered: May 11, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Down the Rabbit Hole
Picture of Jupiter
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by CAR:
quote:
Originally posted by rscalzo:
quote:
Originally posted by Jupiter:
Well...I have a solution that will all but eliminate these discharges. Put those atrocious DAK triggers in those babies. That'll fix 'em. Razz


Not true. Years back we had one officer who let a round go in the then S&W 686. Not to be outdone, he let one go when we transitioned to the S&W 659. Both had trigger pulls in the 12 to 14 pound range. So a mechanical device can always be outdone by a total idiot.



Yep, our local PD had two ADs that I am aware of, one with a S&W Model 10 and the other with a Remington 870 that was still in the cruiser rack (driver later said partner was absent-mindedly fidgeting with the safety and trigger when the gun fired). Both guns were claimed to have "Just gone off by themselves". Roll Eyes

Good thing there was no internet and YouTube in the late 1970's.




We're not talking about cases where someone is pulling the trigger because of brain fade.
Show me one instance where a set of keys, seatbelt, draw string, etc. pulled the trigger of a fully holstered P229/226 with a DAK trigger. If you do find one, that means it's pretty damn rare wouldn't ya say?
I never said it would eliminate. I said it would "all but eliminate". Reading comprehension is fundamental. Wink

Here is the definition of "all but eliminate" just in case you need help understanding the meaning.

"all but eliminated" means almost completely gone, or very nearly eliminated, but not entirely".


Diligentia, Vis, Celeritas

"People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
-- George Orwell

 
Posts: 5542 | Location: North Mississippi | Registered: August 09, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Shall Not Be Infringed
Picture of nhracecraft
posted Hide Post
Image if we could 'all but eliminate' all the speculation and conjecture being promulgated as fact on this matter.


____________________________________________________________

If Some is Good, and More is Better.....then Too Much, is Just Enough !!
Trump 47....Making America Great Again!
"May Almighty God bless the United States of America" - parabellum 7/26/20
Live Free or Die!
 
Posts: 10864 | Location: New Hampshire | Registered: October 29, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Down the Rabbit Hole
Picture of Jupiter
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by nhracecraft:
Image if we could 'all but eliminate' all the speculation and conjecture being promulgated as fact on this matter.


Slap a dingus on that P320 and we might get there. Big Grin


Diligentia, Vis, Celeritas

"People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
-- George Orwell

 
Posts: 5542 | Location: North Mississippi | Registered: August 09, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Jupiter:
Well...I have a solution that will all but eliminate these discharges. Put those atrocious DAK triggers in those babies. That'll fix 'em. Razz


I grew up shooting DA revolvers and, shoot them exceptionally well. Then carried and competed with a 1911 for 20 years.

I think for duty guns, a long smooth trigger, with an exposed hammer, or a cocked and locked semiauto are the optimal carry guns. To this day, my two favorite appendix guns are one of two P239’s. DAK. One in 357 SIG and one 9mm.

This whole uncommanded discharge thing just may be proof that a cocked and unlocked pistol, with a short light trigger (the P320), though possibly mechanically safe, has exceeded the envelope of what’s actually safe to carry in day to day, rough and tumble, police and military usage.
 
Posts: 1038 | Location: High desert. Nevada | Registered: April 15, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Down the Rabbit Hole
Picture of Jupiter
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Sgt 127:

I think for duty guns, a long smooth trigger, with an exposed hammer, or a cocked and locked semiauto are the optimal carry guns. To this day, my two favorite appendix guns are one of two P239’s. DAK.


I will say this about the DAK trigger. I know some folks who can absolutely eat the center out of a target at 25 yards with a P229 .40. For those willing to put in the time and effort, they can be shot surprisingly well. They may not be the current hotness but I would never make the mistake of underestimating someone who knows how to shoot the DAK trigger to its potential. It may not be my favorite trigger for performance based shooting but I can't think of a safer trigger system for appendix carry or duty for that matter.


Diligentia, Vis, Celeritas

"People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
-- George Orwell

 
Posts: 5542 | Location: North Mississippi | Registered: August 09, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Mark Novak just posted a video on the 320. It's about 15 minutes long. He shows the mechanics and basically says he doesn't believe that they discharge on their own.

 
Posts: 1305 | Registered: October 15, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Left-Handed,
NOT Left-Winged!
posted Hide Post
So we are proving that a light short trigger is easy to pull inadvertently by various methods.

This is a profound deduction worthy of Sherlock Holmes?

Remember that the first 100-some years of semi-auto handgun development was basically figuring out ways to have a relatively light trigger pull, but preventing ND's. SA with manual safety, DA/SA with manual safety, DA/SA with decocker, DA/SA with decocker and safety, squeeze cockers, etc.

Then Glock did an end run around all the "rules", and put out a gun with a light/medium weight and medium travel trigger, "safety" dingus on the trigger to satisfy "manual safety" requirements by militaries, and enough DA in the pull to satisfy DAO-only police administrators. Gaston was clever by meeting the letter of the requirements but in a non-traditional way that gave his pistol an edge.

Then everyone started falling over themselves to provide a "better" trigger than Glock - less spongy, more crisp, less travel. So now with have fully cocked strikers with SA triggers with no "safety" and we are surprised ND's are happening.

No shit Sherlock.

This is the logical end of the striker pistol design trajectory - an SA trigger pull that is not much different than a cocked classic Sig in SA. Sig just went a little too far and now they have to pull back a little. Heavier trigger, more travel like an HK LEM, or a dingus.
 
Posts: 5622 | Location: Indiana | Registered: December 28, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 ... 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 ... 93 
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  SIG Pistols    The Sig P320 and discharges.

© SIGforum 2026