I’ve got to say, I’m really getting nervous about this election. I keep reminding myself that this is the Democratic Party that we’re dealing with; the party of smoke and mirrors, sleight of hand, corruption, and fraud.


I can see three possible outcomes of this concerning Hillary.


1. If she losses, she will be indicted unless Obama gives her a pardon before he leaves office. We all know how much he hates the Clintons, so I don’t think he will “give” her one. I however, wouldn’t put it past him to sell her one. (He could name his own price)


2. If she wins, I believe she will still lose. The first thing the Republicans will do is start impeachment proceedings against her because of the corruption investigation. I think there are enough Democrats that hate her and would go along with throwing her out of office to get it done. It would be a win, win for them; get rid of her and still have a Democrat in the White House. Better yet, one they can control.


3. This is the one that has me really worried. She could drop out at the last minute because of health reasons. The stage is already set for this; everyone is aware of her apparent problems.


Since it’s too late to have someone added to the ballot, I would assume Kaine would move up to the No. 1 spot. (There doesn’t seem to be a procedure in place to cover this situation, at least that I can find.) This might bring the Never Hillary democrats and independents back into the Democratic folds while we’re still stuck with the Never Trump republicans. Trump would also be caught flat footed and not prepared for a different opponent. I think the democrats, and maybe even Hillary herself, knows that if she stays until the election she will get destroyed by Trump. They would just be adding bait and switch to their bag of dirty tricks.


If this is the plan, I’m sure a deal has already been struck with Kaine. She takes the heat up until the last minute and leaves him facing Donald with no dirty baggage and if he wins, he pardons her. She might even already have document in hand, signed by him and dated Jan. 21.


I’m hoping, praying, fingers crossed and everything else that she is hard headed enough, arrogant enough and in good enough health to stay in until the election.


Ok, I’m off to the store for some more tin foil.

In my humble opinion the voters in the United States should be concentrating on getting out the vote and joining the Trump train with enthusiasm! No more speculation on what might happen if this or that takes place on election day. We hold in our hands the power to elect Trump to the presidency. Everyone needs to talk to their friends and family members and get the vote out for Trump. Have each of those friends and family members reach out to their friends and family members to spread the word on voting for the best candidate for President of the U.S. Donald Trump. Start today, get on the TRUMP train!

The globalists need her in. Even if she is drooling while her hand is on the Bible. Once she's in there...it doesnt matter. We will see her once every year like Castro waving to fake fawning crowds. They will pick the agenda. They will pick the Court.

I dont think,folks realize how evil this crowd is.

She absolutely cannot get in or we will have more decisions by the Supreme Court like yesterday's ruling on the NC Voter ID law. To say it's critical would be an understatement.

some good news

http://www.foxnews.com/politic...before-election.html

The State Department agreed Thursday to turn over all the planning schedules from Hillary Clinton's time serving as secretary of state to The Associated Press by mid-October in an abrupt reversal from U.S. government lawyers' warning last week that hundreds of pages would not be released until after the presidential election.

The decision will make available all of Clinton's minute-by-minute schedules before the presidential election.

Those planning documents offer a detailed look at Clinton's daily routine during her four-year tenure as secretary of state between 2009 and 2013.

The State Department provided the AP some of the Democratic presidential nominee's official calendars from her time at the department, but some of those calendars had been edited after her events and, in some cases, names of those who met with her had been omitted.

The department has so far released about half of her more complete daily schedules.

"As stated in today’s court filing, the Department had no objection to shifting its resources as long as its overall processing burden was not increased," State Department Spokesperson John Kirby said in a statement. "Consequently, the Department plans to complete its production of former Secretary Clinton’s schedules not later than October 17.”

The State Department's decision Thursday to turn over all of the more-detailed daily schedules by Oct. 17 means it will have to triple its pace of producing 600 pages a month. That production schedule was ordered last January by U.S. District Court Judge Richard Leon.

The AP first asked for all Clinton's calendars in 2010 and again in 2013 under the U.S. Freedom of Information Act, but the State Department did not release them. After further delays, the AP sued the State Department in federal court in March 2015 to obtain the planning materials and other records, leading to Leon's order.



*********************
more dirt may come out about Clinton Foundation "visitors"

it is good that the AP is pushing this.

quote:

We hold in our hands the power to elect Trump to the presidency

I think you are right. We need to all get people who believe in Trump's message to be there on election day.

It is always about turn out.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-g...eparated-two-points/

A new poll of Virginia voters released by the Hampton University Center For Public Policy found Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump separated by only two points.

Clinton 43%
Trump 41%
not sure or refused to answer 16%

High Priority issues:
jobs & economy 52%
terrorism 18%
healthcare 16%
size of govt 5%
immigration 4%

******************
if the above numbers for priority issues are anywhere near correct, it shows how successful the MSM has been in manipulating the news

adding: the info on issues is a bit misleading.

the actual poll question was:

Please tell me which one issue on this list should be the top priority of the next President of the United States, no matter who it is

The list was jobs/economy, terrorism, healthcare, size of govt, immigration

https://www.scribd.com/documen...tial-Poll#from_embed

quote:

High Priority issues:
jobs & economy 52%
terrorism 18%
healthcare 16%
size of govt 5%
immigration 4%

Non of those are going to be addressed by a Killary administration, quite the opposite.

quote:

Originally posted by sdy:
not sure or refused to answer 16%

Guess who the majority of those are going to vote for? I'm one of them. I don't answer polls or political phone calls. It is also well known that liberals are way more likely to give you their opinion than conservatives. Believe me! [to use Trump's phrase ]

quote:

uess who the majority of those are going to vote for? I'm one of them. I don't answer polls or political phone calls.

I do. And I tell them what a big Hillary supporter I am. Don't believe the polls.

quote:

Originally posted by a1abdj:

quote:

uess who the majority of those are going to vote for? I'm one of them. I don't answer polls or political phone calls.

I do. And I tell them what a big Hillary supporter I am. Don't believe the polls.

That works too but I wouldn't be able to say it believably or without laughing in their ear.

Very interesting. Same newspaper, same content but with different headlines geared towards different audiences. One was distributed in a conservative part of Texas and the other was distributed in Austin, TX.

Guess which is which?

free picture upload

Fuck tha WSJ. Them bitches don't even have a comics section.

Look at the ads at the top of the two papers. . .

"The Loafer Steps Up"

"The Rise Of The Loafer"

Looks like the Progressive Party / Free Shit Crowd / BLM, is sending 'secret' messages on the front-page of this self-proclaimed conservative publication.

quote:

Originally posted by ChicagoSigMan:
Very interesting. Same newspaper, same content but with different headlines geared towards different audiences. One was distributed in a conservative part of Texas and the other was distributed in Austin, TX.

Guess which is which?

Different editions of the paper: 2-star vs. 4 star. Explanation of stars in newspapers here:

Look under the box 'The 5000-Year Government Debt Bubble" on the right margin near the top of each of the papers, and you'll see the stars - two on the left and four on the right. The caption changed somewhere in the editorial process after the 2-star edition went out, is all.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-g...ians-endorses-trump/

Hobby Lobby founder and CEO David Green authored a USA Today op-ed on Thursday, denouncing Hillary Clinton’s militant opposition to traditional Christian beliefs and insisting that her Supreme Court picks would rule against Christians’ rights.

He also announced that he is endorsing Donald Trump to ensure a Supreme Court that will uphold Americans’ First Amendment rights under the Constitution.

By contrast, Donald Trump has published a list of 11 judges he would consider for filling Scalia’s seat, a list of originalist judges experts refer to as a “conservative goldmine.”

Explaining that Trump’s list of potential Supreme Court nominees “inspires confidence that there is hope” for his family to be able to live in a country that respects their fundamental rights to religious liberty, Green tells his fellow American voters, “For Americans who value freedom of religion, we must elect a president who will support a Supreme Court that upholds not only this freedom, but all that have emanated from it. That president is Donald Trump.”

****************
probably won't hear from many pulpits on Sunday. too bad.

quote:

Originally posted by joel9507:

quote:

Originally posted by ChicagoSigMan:
Very interesting. Same newspaper, same content but with different headlines geared towards different audiences. One was distributed in a conservative part of Texas and the other was distributed in Austin, TX.

Guess which is which?

Different editions of the paper: 2-star vs. 4 star. Explanation of stars in newspapers here:

Look under the box 'The 5000-Year Government Debt Bubble" on the right margin near the top of each of the papers, and you'll see the stars - two on the left and four on the right. The caption changed somewhere in the editorial process after the 2-star edition went out, is all.

So what? The key word in your response is "editorial process" - the paper made an editorial decision to change the headline that was distributed to different audiences.

https://vault.fbi.gov/hillary-r.-clinton


pdf files at link

FBI releases redacted Clinton interview

quote:

Originally posted by ChicagoSigMan:

quote:

Originally posted by joel9507:

quote:

Originally posted by ChicagoSigMan:
Very interesting. Same newspaper, same content but with different headlines geared towards different audiences. One was distributed in a conservative part of Texas and the other was distributed in Austin, TX.

Guess which is which?

Different editions of the paper: 2-star vs. 4 star. Explanation of stars in newspapers here:

Look under the box 'The 5000-Year Government Debt Bubble" on the right margin near the top of each of the papers, and you'll see the stars - two on the left and four on the right. The caption changed somewhere in the editorial process after the 2-star edition went out, is all.

So what? The key word in your response is "editorial process" - the paper made an editorial decision to change the headline that was distributed to different audiences.

Replace the words 'to different audiences' with the words 'in a later edition' and you would then be correct.

I ask them questions, like:

1. What are the names and genders of Loretta Lynch's grandkids?

2. What is her golf handicap?