Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
Ammoholic |
There are all sorts of art forms out there. This Doctor (of education?) has raised being an annoyingly Pollyanna of a cheerleader to high art. If this works out correctly, I might almost forgive him. | |||
|
Ubique |
That would suggest some type of government agency was interested in investigating election fraud. That seems like a bit of a stretch. Calgary Shooting Centre | |||
|
Lawyers, Guns and Money |
I don't know if true or not... but the internet chatter of which you speak appears to originate with this tweet: DigitalWarrior @Mickeegee2020 Just in: Ruby Freeman (the Blonde Braided Lady in the Georgia State Farm Video) has flipped. She has completely turned on the Georgia Democrats and is in witness protection for her safety. GAME OVER!!! https://twitter.com/Mickeegee2.../1339351794338689031 Who knows... but until we hear more, don't get too excited. "Some things are apparent. Where government moves in, community retreats, civil society disintegrates and our ability to control our own destiny atrophies. The result is: families under siege; war in the streets; unapologetic expropriation of property; the precipitous decline of the rule of law; the rapid rise of corruption; the loss of civility and the triumph of deceit. The result is a debased, debauched culture which finds moral depravity entertaining and virtue contemptible." -- Justice Janice Rogers Brown "The United States government is the largest criminal enterprise on earth." -rduckwor | |||
|
Bad dog! |
For a really insightful perspective on what's going on now I recommend The Gulag Archipelago by Alexander Solzhenitsyn. There is a one volume edition that was edited by Solzhenitsyn himself, and it's very good. For one thing, he says early on in the narrative that the reader will think that these kinds of horrors-- secret police, neighbours spying on neighbours, midnight raids in which people are carted off with no explanation, prisons-- gulags-- with nightmarish conditions-- are so extreme "they could not possibly happen in my country." But, Solzhenitsyn says, they definitely could. Totalitarianism can happen anywhere. But also, as regards the stolen election. Truth and falsity have no reality to communists. They parrot the lie of the day because they are all parroting the lie of the day. If you have any attachment to "truth," you will be purged. In fact, the party lies become more and more outrageous and totally unbelievable just to test the waters and see that everyone will nod and agree docilely. If you agree that something totally outrageous is true-- like, say, that a senile old man who could not draw a dozen people to a rally actually got 80 million votes-- you will accept anything as true. But you will be purged if you become too attached to a particular lie. The party will often say one thing today, and the opposite tomorrow. You are expected to swear that you never said what everyone heard you say yesterday because today you are saying the opposite. (How many such examples have we had from the Democrats just in the past year?) And to show how absolutely bizarre things can get with totalitarians, you can't even be too attached to the party itself! Solzhenitsyn names the names of high party officials who were purged because they were too attached to the party! It really is the extreme of nihilism and cynicism in the service of raw power, and the elimination of all qualities that we hold in highest regard as defining "human." When you are there, you then can send millions to their death, starved and tortured in gulags. So, are the Democrats trying to steal the election? Listen carefully to Adam Schiff next time you see him on tv, or Hillary, or... it's a long list... and you will see and hear someone for whom "truth" has absolutely no meaning whatsoever. It is an empty category. And an empty human being. ______________________________________________________ "You get much farther with a kind word and a gun than with a kind word alone." | |||
|
Nullus Anxietas |
I'll believe it when a law enforcement agency hold a presser to that effect. I won't be holding my breath. And, when the list of 2020 words that should be banned in 2021 shows up, it damn well better include "bombshell." And "Kraken." "America is at that awkward stage. It's too late to work within the system,,,, but too early to shoot the bastards." -- Claire Wolfe "If we let things terrify us, life will not be worth living." -- Seneca the Younger, Roman Stoic philosopher | |||
|
Member |
term limits! | |||
|
Peripheral Visionary |
The simplest answer. | |||
|
Oriental Redneck |
Add "Breaking", "Shocking" and "Biblical" to the list. Q | |||
|
Too soon old, Too late smart |
No question...equity added for sure! _______________________________________ NRA Life Member Member Isaac Walton League I wouldn't let anyone do to me what I've done to myself | |||
|
Member |
Ruby Freeman is the mom and her daughter Shay Shay or whatever is the one who has the long blonde braids so the story already has that much wrong. My guess is those two are so hard core they could probably be water boarded for days and not give anything up and then bust their way out of a CIA black prison in the jungle Rambo style. "Fixed fortifications are monuments to mans stupidity" - George S. Patton | |||
|
So let it be written, so let it be done... |
DNI John Ratcliffe Says There Was Foreign Interference in November Elections: Report By Masooma Haq December 17, 2020 Updated: December 17, 2020 Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe confirmed that there was foreign interference in the 2020 election, according to CBS correspondent Catherine Herridge. “Well DNI Ratcliffe leads the 17 intelligence agencies and he has access to the most highly classified information that is held by the US government. And he told CBS News that there was foreign interference by China, Iran, and Russia in November of this year and he is anticipating a public report on those findings in January,” Herridge said. Ratcliffe’s office did not immediately respond to The Epoch Times’ request for confirmation of the report. Ratcliffe’s statement contradicts others made by national security officials. Christopher Krebs, the recently-fired top cybersecurity official during the presidential election, testified before the Senate’s Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee on Wednesday. “While elections are sometimes messy, this was a secure election,” Krebs said. On a Nov. 27 “60 minutes” interview, Krebs was asked what he thought of the Trump legal team’s allegations that votes were tabulated in foreign countries and were manipulated. “So, all votes in the United States of America are counted in the United States of America,” Krebs said. “I don’t understand this claim. All votes in the United States of America are counted in the United States of America. Period.” Adding, “So, again, there’s no evidence that any machine that I’m aware of, has been manipulated by a foreign power. Period.” Sidney Powell a former federal prosecutor who has been seen working alongside President Donald Trump’s legal team pushing election challenges, filed a letter with the Supreme Court on Dec. 13 to notify them of two batches of recently obtained evidence about Dominion Voting Systems voting equipment. Her letter outlines new affidavits from two forensic experts who allege that international interference took place in the 2020 election and that Dominion systems were connected to foreign systems around the globe. Powell said that two military intelligence analysts have signed sworn affidavits stating that the SSL certificates from dominionvoting.com were used multiple times from Canada, Serbia, and the United States. Meanwhile, the office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) confirmed that their upcoming report includes information about “relevant” foreign threats from the recent election. “The IC has received relevant reporting since the election and a number of agencies have not finished coordinating on the product,” said Amanda Schoch, a spokeswoman for the office, adding that Ratcliffe remains committed to an expeditious release of the report. ODNI announced late Wednesday that the Intelligence Community (IC) has notified Ratcliffe that they will not meet the Dec. 18 deadline set by President Trump’s executive order to submit the report on foreign threats during the November election as “agencies have not finished coordinating on the product.” “This afternoon the DNI was notified by career intelligence officials that the Intelligence Community (IC) will not meet the Dec. 18 deadline, set by executive order and Congress to submit the IC’s classified assessment on foreign threats to the 2020 U.S. elections,” said Schoch. Dec. 18 marks 45 days after the Nov. 3 general election, when, according to Trump’s executive order from 2018, the DNI was expected to deliver a report regarding “to the maximum extent ascertainable” whether any interference attempts took place, and the nature of such interference, methods used, and who was involved and authorized such efforts. LINK 'veritas non verba magistri' | |||
|
Lawyers, Guns and Money |
White House Senior Advisor Peter Navarro Releases Independent Report on 2020 Election In his capacity as a private citizen, likely a position related to legal advice from White House counsel, Senior White House Policy Advisor Peter Navarro has released a 36-page report containing a review and summary of findings from the 2020 election. Within the report [direct pdf here] Navarro outlines the issues at stake within several key states in the election contest. The report highlights several troubling issues related to the way mail-in, potentially fraudulent ballots, were handled in Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Wisconsin Nevada and Pennsylvania. Within those states the activity by regional officials is critical to understanding the controversial post-election-day outcomes. https://theconservativetreehou...lection/#more-206178 "Some things are apparent. Where government moves in, community retreats, civil society disintegrates and our ability to control our own destiny atrophies. The result is: families under siege; war in the streets; unapologetic expropriation of property; the precipitous decline of the rule of law; the rapid rise of corruption; the loss of civility and the triumph of deceit. The result is a debased, debauched culture which finds moral depravity entertaining and virtue contemptible." -- Justice Janice Rogers Brown "The United States government is the largest criminal enterprise on earth." -rduckwor | |||
|
Freethinker |
Good concise summary of totalitarianism, justjoe. There are many other books that explain in detail the same things. One of my favorite is The Soviet Tragedy: A History of Socialism in Russia, 1917-1991 by Martin Malia. ► 6.4/93.6 ___________ “We are Americans …. Together we have resisted the trap of appeasement, cynicism, and isolation that gives temptation to tyrants.” — George H. W. Bush | |||
|
Member |
"Systemic" "Critical"
--------------------------------------- It's like my brain's a tree and you're those little cookie elves. | |||
|
wishing we were congress |
can't find out who the person talking is, but looks like House of Representatives ? or Texas ? He says he is a SREC member. SREC = State Republican Executive Committee of the governing board of REP Party of Texas. repeating the claim a staffer heard Roberts yelling in the mtg about the Texas case. video at link https://twitter.com/i/status/1339641451215544322 Roberts ? "I don't want to hear about it. At that time we didn't have riots" xxxxxxxxxxxxx edit CTH provides details https://theconservativetreehou...t-riots/#more-206185 During the Texas presidential electors legislative session there was a debate over an amendment to wording where the Texas House would rebuke the Supreme Court of the United States for “moral cowardice” in not allowing the Texas challenge to be heard. During the amendment debate Texas Congressman Matt Patrick (CD-32) put into the ¹record a report from a claimed “Supreme Court staffer” about an internal debate taking place within the high court where justices were arguing the reasons for not allowing the Texas election challenge to take place. As outlined by Patrick Chief Justice Roberts was worried about riots in the streets if the court heard the Texas arguments and evidence. "To be fair – It should be noted the claim comes with no specific citation for further review or analysis; and considering the heightened sense of concern over the election, more details should be requested before making assumptions about the described incident" | |||
|
Oriental Redneck |
Regurgitated hearsay. Was initially brought up a few pages back. Q | |||
|
wishing we were congress |
Problem is that what the SC did in rejecting the Texas case was a Supreme act of cowardice. And the obvious reason for DEMs to allow the big city riots and "take overs" was to damage President Trump. And finally, from what we have seen of John Roberts, it fits quite well of who he appears to be. Even if there wasn't screaming, do you really think Roberts had an honorable reason to reject the Texas case ? xxxxxxxxxxxx like so many things we don't understand today, the bizarre part is that such a report even might be true. | |||
|
Uppity Helot |
Too many shithead lefty’s would see the above as a manual instead of a cautionary tale. | |||
|
Oriental Redneck |
We all know Roberts is a coward. Has been a coward ever since Obamacare. Wouldn't surprise me at all, if there was actual screaming. But, point here is we shouldn't jump at every unverified report like it's gospel. "A staffer told me so and so" is good for gossip garbage but is not real news. Q | |||
|
Member |
| |||
|
Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 ... 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 ... 1289 |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |