Large and Diverse Pro-Trump Rally Descends on Beverly Hills

Video at link:

https://www.breitbart.com/poli...ds-on-beverly-hills/

An October 10, 2020, a pro-Trump rally in Beverly Hills, California, was not only large and energetic, but was comprised of people from all walks of life, various races, and even genders.

There were at least two previous pro-Trump rallies in Beverly Hills, the most recent on October 3, 2020. Breitbart News reported that that rally was crashed by BLM and Anitifa, with demonstrators holding signs that read, “NAZI TRUMPS FUCK OFF!” and “DEPORT NAZI SCUM.”

Whitney R., who attended last Saturday’s rally and the one before it, told Breitbart News that today’s was “the largest” rally with the “most diverse turnout.”

Whitney added, “The energy was running high and American pride was everywhere.”

Numerous photos taken at the rally show the crowd and the pro-Trump, pro-America passion:

Mailed DJT another $100 yesterday to help him keep spreading the Truth.

Starting to see more Trump signs here. Just in the last few days. Saw a truck out last night flying three flags. Two for Trump. One US. Getting my replacement flag today at the hardware store.

Watched a couple boats go by last night with Trump flags in the rocket launchers. The fun part was they stopped behind the house with the Biden signs in the front yard while blasting God Bless the USA on the boats' stereos. They were clearly trying to antagonize the Biden guy.

The sad thing is the Trump guy is the next door neighbor of the Biden guy. There is just an empty lot between them. They're between my end of the dead end street and the main road so I drive by them all the time and they seemed to be friends.

^^It's rallies like that which must keep the leftist campaign strategists awake at night.

They must thank whatever monetary-based deity they make their sacrifices to every night that they have the Fake MSM DEEP in their pocket... otherwise this election race would be long over by now.

$.02 worth.

Boss

quote:

Originally posted by egregore:

quote:

Even Piers Morgan, who supposedly likes President Trump, had a story this week about him burning out.

This "he's burning out" and the related "he only sought the job as a publicity stunt, was surprised when he got it, and now wants out of it" horse shit has been a running theme of theirs almost from the beginning.

Yep, total manure. "burning out"? These morons must be from an alternate universe and somehow slipped into this one.

quote:

Originally posted by 12131:
Yep, total manure. "burning out"? These morons must be from an alternate universe and somehow slipped into this one.

I just wish they'd go back where they came from.

flashguy

weird - Jake Tapper explains to Biden campaign that it is constitutional for Amy Coney Barrett to be nominated and voted on in the Senate.

video at

https://twitter.com/abigailmar.../1315285111055822850


"Tapper takes Biden's deputy campaign manager to task on Biden's accusation that filling a judicial vacancy is 'unconstitutional'

"That's not what the word constitutional means. [It] doesn’t mean I like it or don’t like it. It means it’s according to the US Constitution.""

Tapper: "That's a poll. Thats not the constitution"

xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Senate Judiciary hearing on Barrett starts tomorrow, 12 Oct 2020

^^^^ Tapper will get a trip to the principal's office, after that exchange.

I think "decreasing viral loads" and "increasing cycle threshold times" means that to detect the virus they have had to go to increasingly higher numbers of cycles in the PCR analysis.

quote:

Originally posted by sdy:
weird - Jake Tapper explains to Biden campaign that it is constitutional for Amy Coney Barrett to be nominated and voted on in the Senate.

video at

https://twitter.com/abigailmar.../1315285111055822850


"Tapper takes Biden's deputy campaign manager to task on Biden's accusation that filling a judicial vacancy is 'unconstitutional'

"That's not what the word constitutional means. [It] doesn’t mean I like it or don’t like it. It means it’s according to the US Constitution.""

Tapper: "That's a poll. Thats not the constitution"

xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Senate Judiciary hearing on Barrett starts tomorrow, 12 Oct 2020

I must admit, that exchange was a head scratcher for me. Not sure what Tapper is up to.

23 days till the election.

Coming at us fast now.

Oh yeah, Biden is up by double digits and running away with Florida. Keep preaching media morons, few are buying it.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/ne...t-caravan-Miami.html

Interesting that this is in UK news....but crickets on this side of the pond from our fine media.iiif they do it will be "But they weren't all wearing masks!"

quote:

quote:

It all just seems rigged and against us.

It is... but look beyond the polls:

Looking beyond the polls, there continue to be signs that Trump will win

There’s a delicate balance between hope and false hope. If we have hope, it’s incredible what we can do. If we have false hope, as the Democrats did in 2016, when those hopes are dashed, we risk going insane, as the Democrats have done every minute since November 8, 2016. Currently, the big polls show Biden cruising to victory, with Trump staggering after. However, Don Surber, who predicted Trump’s victory last time around, predicts Trump will win as many as 37 states! I thought I’d share with you some of his thoughts.

First, the mere fact that Surber got it right the last time around is not the reason I rely on him. After all, it was a binary election: Either Trump or Hillary would win. That Surber picked correctly meant he was willing to look beyond the polls, but it doesn’t make him a guru.

No, what makes Surber a guru is that he tends to be correct about so many things when it comes to understanding how Trump operates and seeing through the media’s machinations. I read Surber’s blog six days a week (he doesn’t blog on Sundays) with almost religious discipline. A former journalist himself (back in the day when it meant reporting the facts, not shaping the narrative), Surber is an excellent writer and a superb analyst. I always learn from him

On Saturday, Surber again predicted that Trump would win. But typically, Surber didn’t just say, “I don’t believe the polls.” Instead, he drilled down into some fascinating details.

The first point Surber made is that the Democrats are suddenly working hard in Pennsylvania. Or, as a Yahoo report said, “In campaign’s final stretch, Democrats claw their way back in Pennsylvania” – a state in which, according to Real Clear Politics, Biden’s lead averages 7.1%. Surber asked the right question: “If Democrats are that far ahead in Pennsylvania, why is the media saying he is clawing back?”

It’s significant for Surber that the Democrats have set up a campaign office in Erie County, a small county in northeastern Pennsylvania. Admittedly, Trump won there in 2016, but that doesn’t necessarily mean that Biden should go to war in Erie. It turns out, though, that Erie has a peculiar predictive property, said Surber:

[T]he last time Erie got it wrong was in 1988 when it went for Dukakis and the rest of the state went for Bush. The last time before that was 1944, when it went for Dewey instead of FDR. I will take a county that was right about how its state voted in 95% of the last 20 elections.

Democrats sweating Erie is an indication that gee, maybe, that 7-point lead is as believable as an email from a Nigerian prince.

538 gives Biden less than a 53% chance of winning Pennsylvania. That also says a lot about that 7-point lead.

Surber also picked up on a point that Ace, writing at Ace of Spades, made:

If there were a lot of Trump defectors, the media would be profiling them and lionizing them and promoting them 24-7. But I haven't seen a single story about Trump 2016-Biden 2020 defectors.

True. Instead, as Surber said,

Meanwhile, Johnny Rotten has gone from “don't you dare vote for Donald Trump” to “Of course I'm voting for Trump.”

Maybe Surber is whistling in the dark, trying to scare away the inevitable collapse of the Trump campaign, and maybe I’m just whistling along with him, trying to cheer myself up. Nevertheless, because Surber has repeatedly been prescient about political events over the past five years, I’ve got faith in him. That’s why I have what I hope is real hope, not false hope when Surber makes this prediction:

The number that matters is 270. That is the number of votes in the Electoral College needed to win the election. That 46% gave him 304 Electoral College votes in 2016, even after a couple of them defected. He carried 30 states that year. He will carry 37 this year. He won't get a landslide, which will burn them even more because once again they will come so close but win no cigar.

I highly recommend that you read Surber’s entire post, which you’ll find here, and then bookmark his blog. Trust me, you’ll be glad you did.

Also, here’s another “cheer-up” bonus from Kevin McCullough, which is another piece of information on which Surber relies:

Kevin McCullough
@KMCRadio
·
If you believe the polls. If you’re soooo confident that you’re ticket has this election sewn up in 26 days, why would you need to begin discussing the 25th Amendment to remove a lawfully & overwhelmingly elected @POTUS
? @SpeakerPelosi
asking for a @JoeBiden
#HisInternalsStink



Read more: https://www.americanthinker.co...n.html#ixzz6ac04RHWB

Enthusiastic Pennsylvania voters greet Biden...

with Trump flags.

From The Conservative Treehouse:

Biden-Harris event in Arizona a big deal—except no one showed up.

quote:

Originally posted by sjtill:
From The Conservative Treehouse:

Biden-Harris event in Arizona a big deal—except no one showed up.

Most of the comments in that link agree that massive vote fraud will occur. The only question is: will it be enough to overturn the Election?

flashguy

The “massive voter fraud” seems to be the hand wringers battle cry.

The same folks that kept saying Hilary was going to win, and Trump had no path to victory.