Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
Oriental Redneck |
No one says Fox is infallible. And, not everyone is aware of every sentiment Trump ever expressed. Q | |||
|
quarter MOA visionary |
Blatent or inadvertent? Is that really a point worth debating? | |||
|
Shall Not Be Infringed |
First, I'm not sure if we (any of us!) are in disagreement here, but I don't believe we are, nor should we be. Honestly though, re: blatant vs. inadvertent, I don't think the point IS debatable. The fact is, I don't really trust Fox News to be an independent and unbiased arbiter/reporter of news anymore, and haven't since the 2020 election. Their firing of Tucker Carlson definitely proved my suspicions correct in my eyes, and just like anything from any other news organization, I feel compelled to verify the voracity of everything anymore. I would not be surprised if DEI exists (thrives?) on the down-low within the culture at Fox News, and that they may be participating in an attempt to provide a 'soft landing' for the demise of DEI in corporate culture, as the writing on the wall seems to indicate that is inevitable. Casting this as ‘inadvertently discriminatory’ and tying that falsehood to DTJ’s beliefs to add validity to it would be helpful if that’s their intent. In my eyes, Donald Trump is WAY too insightful to believe that DEI, after expressing how destructive it is and how it absolutely needs to be eliminated, is somehow only 'inadvertently' discriminatory doesn’t pass the smell test. I've met the man a couple of times, and had short conversations with him, and I'm my heart I cannot conceive he would hold this sentiment. We all know that journalism in the Legacy Media is on the brink of extinction, as is accuracy in reporting. Further, they have proven themselves to be willing participants in pushing a narrative, if that narrative benefits the Establishment. Note that they did not quote Donald Trump, but only stated he 'believes' this is the case. Honestly, it’s also possible that this was originally written as ‘intentionally discriminatory’ and it somehow got changed to ‘inadvertently’ along the way. Obviously we’ll never know, but there’s no question that the Legacy Media is the enemy of our freedom(s). We should treat them as such and never assume their on the side of good until it’s proven otherwise. All that said, though we got a little sidetracked here, Harmeet Dhillon is certainly one MOST EXCELLENT pick to lead the Civil Rights Division at DOJ! ____________________________________________________________ If Some is Good, and More is Better.....then Too Much, is Just Enough !! Trump 2024....Make America Great Again! "May Almighty God bless the United States of America" - parabellum 7/26/20 Live Free or Die! | |||
|
SIGforum Official Eye Doc |
Depends if you think these people are evil or just "misinformed." | |||
|
quarter MOA visionary |
Again, why does it matter when Trump has vowed to combat it? | |||
|
Political Cynic |
If it wasn’t an accident it was deliberate All those that think this has all been an accident raise their handsThis message has been edited. Last edited by: nhtagmember, | |||
|
Get my pies outta the oven! |
| |||
|
Member |
"Always legally conceal carry. At the right place and time, one person can make a positive difference." | |||
|
Oriental Redneck |
That's a shame. Fucking scumbags. George Stephanopoulos and ABC "apologize" to Trump, are forced to pay $15 million to settle defamation suit As part of the agreement, Stephanopoulos and the network issued statements of 'regret' for comments that prompted the lawsuit By Gabriel Hays , Brooke Singman | Fox News Published December 14, 2024 3:15pm EST ABC News and their top anchor George Stephanopoulos have reached a settlement with Donald Trump in his defamation suit, which will result in the news network paying the president-elect $15 million. The settlement was publicly filed on Saturday, revealing that the two parties have come to an agreement and avoided a costly trial. According to the settlement, ABC News will pay $15 million as a charitable contribution to a "Presidential foundation and museum to be established by or for Plaintiff, as Presidents of the United States of America have established in the past." Additionally, the network will pay $1 million in Trump's attorney fees. Stephanopoulos and ABC News will issue statements of "regret" as an editor's note at the bottom of a March 10, 2024, online article, about comments made earlier this year that prompted Trump to file a defamation lawsuit. "ABC News and George Stephanopoulos regret statements regarding President Donald J. Trump made during an interview by George Stephanopoulos with Rep. Nancy Mace on ABC’s This Week on March 10, 2024," the statement reads. Trump filed a defamation suit against Stephanopoulos after he asserted that Trump was found "liable for rape" in a civil case during a contentious interview with Rep. Nancy Mace, R-S.C., last March. After playing a clip of Mace discussing being a victim of rape, Stephanopoulos asked her, "How do you square your endorsement of Donald Trump with the testimony we just saw?" "You've endorsed Donald Trump for president. Judges and two separate juries have found him liable for rape and for defaming the victim of that rape," Stephanopoulos said, alluding to the legal victory by Trump accuser E. Jean Carroll. Stephanopoulos repeated that claim ten times during his spat with Mace, despite the fact that a jury actually determined Trump was liable for "sexual abuse," which has a distinct definition under New York law. After the federal jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse, but not rape, Judge Lewis Kaplan wrote in a later ruling that just because Carroll failed to prove rape "within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape.’" Initially, Stephanopoulos was defiant in the face of Trump’s lawsuit, telling CBS late-night host Stephen Colbert that he wouldn’t be "cowed out of doing my job because of a threat" "Trump sued me because I used the word ‘rape,’ even though a judge said that’s in fact what did happen. We filed a motion to dismiss," Stephanopoulos said. The settlement came after U.S. Magistrate Judge Lisette M. Reid recently ordered Trump and Stephanopoulos to attend an in-person deposition hearing next week ahead of the Dec. 24 deadline for the defendants to file a motion for summary judgment, in order to avoid a trial. In his lawsuit against Stephanopoulos and ABC, Trump was represented by Florida attorneys Alejandro Brito and Richard Klugh, who also represent the president-elect in his legal case against CNN. The settlement with ABC was filed in the Southern District of Florida Federal Court where both parties signed and agreed to the terms. The settlement comes after a string of legal victories for Trump and his legal team, coordinated by senior legal adviser Boris Epshteyn. Federal Judge Tanya Chutkan recently granted Special Counsel Jack Smith’s recent request to dismiss his case against Trump related to the 2020 election. Smith also tossed his appeal in the classified records case on Monday after a federal judge dismissed the charges altogether in July, ruling that he was unlawfully appointed as special counsel. In New York v. Trump, Judge Juan Merchan granted Trump’s request to file a motion to dismiss the charges stemming from Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s case and removed the sentencing date for the president-elect from the schedule. Trump is also suing CBS News for $10 billion in damages, stating the network practiced "deceptive conduct" for the purpose of election interference in its interview in October with Vice President Kamala Harris. Q | |||
|
Freethinker |
Makes me smile. “I can’t give you brains, but I can give you a diploma.” — The Wizard of Oz This life is a drill. It is only a drill. If it had been a real life, you would have been given instructions about where to go and what to do. | |||
|
Member |
I just don't ever get tired of winning. I so hope that Trump can have that mess with Alvin Bragg dismissed and he can recover the bale $$$ and interest. | |||
|
Get Off My Lawn |
"I’m not going to read Time Magazine, I’m not going to read Newsweek, I’m not going to read any of these magazines; I mean, because they have too much to lose by printing the truth"- Bob Dylan, 1965 | |||
|
Peace through superior firepower |
Ha ha, ya little asshole. | |||
|
Unflappable Enginerd |
Hilarious __________________________________ NRA Benefactor I lost all my weapons in a boating, umm, accident. http://www.aufamily.com/forums/ | |||
|
Peace through superior firepower |
| |||
|
Member |
_____________________________________________ I may be a bad person, but at least I use my turn signal. | |||
|
Peace through superior firepower |
DC Restaurant Releases Statement Announcing Firing of Woke Employee After She Smeared Trump Officials and Said She Would Not Serve Them A liberal DC Restaurant server has learned the hard way that words have consequences. As The Gateway Pundit reported, several DC food workers wallowing in Kamala Harris’s landslide defeat told The Washingtonian in interviews on Wednesday that they would make Trump administration officials pay should they decide to visit their establishments, even at the cost of their livelihoods. They feel it is their sworn duty to ‘own’ MAGA conservatives who want to save our country. One of these leftists, Suzannah Van Rooy, worked as a server and manager at Beuchert’s Saloon on Capitol Hill. She told The Washingtonian the issue was a matter of ‘morality.’ “I personally would refuse to serve any person in office who I know of as being a sex trafficker or trying to deport millions of people,” she said. “It’s not, ‘Oh, we hate Republicans.’ It’s that this person has moral convictions that are strongly opposed to mine, and I don’t feel comfortable serving them,” Van Rooy continued. Van Rooy now probably wishes she had not made that statement or decided to remain anonymous because Beuchert’s Saloon decided to send her packing on Friday. As one will see, the establishment minced no words in a brutal statement. “Not only do Ms. Van Rooy’s comments clearly violate our zero-tolerance policy on discrimination, but her decision to sign into our social media accounts in the middle of the night to post her own rhetoric in wildly offensive responses to comments is a further breach of conduct and protocol. She has no authority to speak on our behalf, and her comments do not reflect the positions of over twenty other people who make up our staff,” the statement reads. “For these reasons as well as the sheer dismay and disgust we feel at her unforgivable behavior, Ms. Van Rooy has been dismissed immediately. Our staff and families (many of whom are personally offended by Ms. Van Rooy’s comments about them) are still reeling from what Ms. Van Rooy said and did, and we as a restaurant are simply horrified to be associated with base prejudice,” the statement continued. As Fox News notes, Van Rooy worked to help elect Democrats before entering the hospitality industry. According to her since-deleted LinkedIn page, she previously worked as an organizer for far-left Texas Democrat Beto O’Rourke’s unsuccessful run for governor in 2022. One should not be surprised if some woke elected official rescues her from unemployment because they see discriminating against conservatives as an asset. | |||
|
Oriental Redneck |
Some more Saturday winning, this the evening edition. BACKFIRE: DC Restaurant Releases Brutal Statement Announcing Firing of Woke Employee After She Smeared Trump Officials and Said She Would Not Serve Them By Cullen Linebarger | Dec. 14, 2024 6:00 pm A liberal DC Restaurant server has learned the hard way that words have consequences. As The Gateway Pundit reported, several DC food workers wallowing in Kamala Harris’s landslide defeat told The Washingtonian in interviews on Wednesday that they would make Trump administration officials pay should they decide to visit their establishments, even at the cost of their livelihoods. They feel it is their sworn duty to ‘own’ MAGA conservatives who want to save our country. One of these leftists, Suzannah Van Rooy, worked as a server and manager at Beuchert’s Saloon on Capitol Hill. She told The Washingtonian the issue was a matter of ‘morality.’ “I personally would refuse to serve any person in office who I know of as being a sex trafficker or trying to deport millions of people,” she said. “It’s not, ‘Oh, we hate Republicans.’ It’s that this person has moral convictions that are strongly opposed to mine, and I don’t feel comfortable serving them,” Van Rooy continued. Van Rooy now probably wishes she had not made that statement or decided to remain anonymous because Beuchert’s Saloon decided to send her packing on Friday. As one will see, the establishment minced no words in a brutal statement. “Not only do Ms. Van Rooy’s comments clearly violate our zero-tolerance policy on discrimination, but her decision to sign into our social media accounts in the middle of the night to post her own rhetoric in wildly offensive responses to comments is a further breach of conduct and protocol. She has no authority to speak on our behalf, and her comments do not reflect the positions of over twenty other people who make up our staff,” the statement reads. “For these reasons as well as the sheer dismay and disgust we feel at her unforgivable behavior, Ms. Van Rooy has been dismissed immediately. Our staff and families (many of whom are personally offended by Ms. Van Rooy’s comments about them) are still reeling from what Ms. Van Rooy said and did, and we as a restaurant are simply horrified to be associated with base prejudice,” the statement continued. As Fox News notes, Van Rooy worked to help elect Democrats before entering the hospitality industry. According to her since-deleted LinkedIn page, she previously worked as an organizer for far-left Texas Democrat Beto O’Rourke’s unsuccessful run for governor in 2022. One should not be surprised if some woke elected official rescues her from unemployment because they see discriminating against conservatives as an asset. Q | |||
|
Oriental Redneck |
Q | |||
|
delicately calloused |
Lots of winning. The cherry on top would be a reversal of the E. Jean Caroll verdict. You’re a lying dog-faced pony soldier | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 ... 1299 1300 1301 1302 1303 1304 1305 1307 |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |