SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Military folks... Chain of command in mixed service situations
Page 1 2 3 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Military folks... Chain of command in mixed service situations Login/Join 
Unapologetic Old
School Curmudgeon
Picture of Lord Vaalic
posted
If you are in a team or on a mission with people from different branches of the military, how is the chain of command established? The ranks dont line up perfectly across the different branches as far as levels do they? Is an LT an LT no matter what? What about ranks that don't exist in another branch? If there's a general and an admiral, who is in charge, etc.




Don't weep for the stupid, or you will be crying all day
 
Posts: 10782 | Location: TN | Registered: December 18, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
I was an Army MP and my unit patrolled with the Air Force SP’s. I always had a chair force partner and we worked out of an Air Force PMO.
It still applies, and we all knew who was what pay grade. We followed our own customs & courtesies with them.
Now I didn’t exactly answer to the Airmen that out ranked me. And as an E4 I went head to head with an Air Force E7 flight chief and won. But I still had to be respectful, and damn sure had to be right.
But yeah it does apply but its not really a thing honestly. If they had a problem or if we had a problem we’d just go to their chain of command.
 
Posts: 3399 | Registered: December 06, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Told cops where to go for over 29 years…
Picture of 911Boss
posted Hide Post
While there are some differences in names between branches, there is a standard as far as “rank”, or more correctly “pay-grade”.

Officer pay grades are O-1, O-2, etc. through O-10. A Navy O-1 equals an Army O-1 equals an Air Force O-1.

Marines, Army, and Air Force all use the same rank titles, an O-1 in these three branches is a “2nd Lieutenant”.

The Navy and Coast Guard are different, their O-1 is an “Ensign”.


Where it gets confusing is when the different branches use the same title but for different ranks.

A Marine/Army/Air Force “Captain” is an O-3. A Navy/CG “Captain” is an O-6. A Marine/Army/AF O-6 is a “Colonel”.

A Navy/CG O-3 is a “Lieutenant”, and a Marine/Army/AF Lieutenant is an O-1 or O-2 (2nd Lieutenant/1st Lieutenant)

There are four (technically 5) “Admiral” or “General” ranks, O-7 through O-10. For the Marines/Army/AF they are O-7 Brigadier General, O-8 Major General, O-9 Lieutenant General, and O-10 General who sport 1-4 stars.

Navy/CG are O-7/O-8 Rear Admiral (upper/lower), O-9 Vice Admiral, O-10 Admiral


The 5th General rank is “Fleet Admiral” or “General of the Army”. Not actually an additional rank, but a special position for an Admiral or General who commands a large or combined force.






What part of "...Shall not be infringed" don't you understand???


 
Posts: 11420 | Location: Western WA state for just a few more years... | Registered: February 17, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
semi-reformed sailor
Picture of MikeinNC
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Lord Vaalic:
If you are in a team or on a mission with people from different branches of the military, how is the chain of command established?

the officers get together and figure out whose date of rank is older, if they share rank

The ranks dont line up perfectly across the different branches as far as levels do they? Is an LT an LT no matter what?

no a LT in the Army is an O1 or O2 while in the navy and CG a LT is an O3....a Captain in the Army is an O3 and in the Navy or CG he’s an O6.

What about ranks that don't exist in another branch? If there's a general and an admiral, who is in charge, etc.

They compare dates of rank.


https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/ma...6e65eae3715b0a2cd9-c



"Violence, naked force, has settled more issues in history than has any other factor.” Robert A. Heinlein

“You may beat me, but you will never win.” sigmonkey-2020

“A single round of buckshot to the torso almost always results in an immediate change of behavior.” Chris Baker
 
Posts: 11568 | Location: Temple, Texas! | Registered: October 07, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
I Wanna Missile
Picture of tanksoldier
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Lord Vaalic:
If you are in a team or on a mission with people from different branches of the military, how is the chain of command established? The ranks dont line up perfectly across the different branches as far as levels do they? Is an LT an LT no matter what? What about ranks that don't exist in another branch? If there's a general and an admiral, who is in charge, etc.


They actually do line up perfectly.

Seniority is determined by pay grade, time in grade, time in service and then age... in that order.

For the purposes of cross-service rank comparison, the Army’s ranks of Corporal and Specialist (pay grade E-4) are considered equivalent.

quote:
Where it gets confusing is when the different branches use the same title but for different rank


A friend, a newly commissioned Air Force 2Lt, was attending some officer thing or other on a naval base. “Lieutenant Friend” got a much nicer room than “Ensign-Equivalent Friend” would have.



"I am a Soldier. I fight where I'm told and I win where I fight."
GEN George S. Patton, Jr.
 
Posts: 21542 | Location: Eastern plains of Colorado | Registered: January 25, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
There are also duty positions. For example a Detachment might have multiple O-3s and E-7s but it will have one detachment Commander or OIC and 1 Non-Commisioned Officer in Charge (NCOIC). So members of that unit will defer to the OIC and NCOIC. A Provincial reconstruction team (PRT) is a good example of this. You'd have a Navy or Airforce O-5 in command with Army, Navy and Air Force Subordinates.
There is also OPCON,ADCON and other support relationships.
 
Posts: 4826 | Location: Where ever Uncle Sam Sends Me | Registered: March 05, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of SIGguy229
posted Hide Post
I won’t repeat what others have already said, but in a joint environment, standard customs and courtesies apply across all services. However, the “who is in charge” question is solved by whichever position (or “billet”) the individual(s) is/are filling.
 
Posts: 1735 | Location: South.....Carolina | Registered: May 25, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Back, and
to the left
Picture of 83v45magna
posted Hide Post
No has mention yet another Lieutenant, the Navy O-2 Lieutenant Junior Grade or J.G.

That complicates things just that little bit more.

These are best understood on a grid:


Honor is due to member creslin for making SF a photohost acct. Smile

Officers are the easy ones. It's the enlisted that can seem really convoluted across services

Plus 4 levels of Warrant Officers. Big Grin



I returned, and saw under the sun, that the race is not to the swift, nor the battle to the strong, neither yet bread to the wise, nor yet riches to men of understanding, nor yet favour to men of skill; but time and chance happeneth to them all. -Ecclesiastes 9:11

...But the king shall rejoice in God; every one that sweareth by Him shall glory, but the mouth of them that speak lies shall be stopped. - Psalm 63:11 [excerpted]
 
Posts: 7483 | Location: Dallas | Registered: August 04, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Hobbs
posted Hide Post
In a mission with different branches of the military, with multiple members from each branch, both enlisted and officer, the chain of command still falls within each branch participating. All things pretty much equal, the person in charge of the mission will depend on circumstance or mission and/or whomever has been appointed as such. Or may even be a high ranking officer located remotely.
 
Posts: 4871 | Location: Bathing in the stream of consciousness ~~~ | Registered: July 06, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
semi-reformed sailor
Picture of MikeinNC
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 83v45magna:
No has mention yet another Lieutenant, the Navy O-2 Lieutenant Junior Grade or J.G.

That complicates things just that little bit more.

Big Grin


A jg is addressed as Lieutenant Or sir, but in writing he is addressed as LTJG or LTjg....

Just like talking to an admiral lower half...you call him “Admiral” and leave out the lh....

CWOs are called “Sir” when writing you might just write CWO, it is also correct to write CWO2, CWO4, etc

And to confound it a little more....when an officer is in charge of a ship, regardless of his rank...he is addressed as “Captain”
(I was on one ship that had a Lt as CO, he was called captain, another a CWO was the CO, has was called Captain, and on another a Commander was the CO..he also was called Captain)



"Violence, naked force, has settled more issues in history than has any other factor.” Robert A. Heinlein

“You may beat me, but you will never win.” sigmonkey-2020

“A single round of buckshot to the torso almost always results in an immediate change of behavior.” Chris Baker
 
Posts: 11568 | Location: Temple, Texas! | Registered: October 07, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Glorious SPAM!
Picture of mbinky
posted Hide Post
quote:
Plus 4 levels of Warrant Officers.


You mean 5? (at least for everyone but the Coasties) Smile

 
Posts: 10640 | Registered: June 13, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
A Grateful American
Picture of sigmonkey
posted Hide Post
I see everyone left out "Corporal Captain", it was a U.S. Army brevet rank during the Korean conflict...




"the meaning of life, is to give life meaning" Ani Yehudi אני יהודי Le'olam lo shuv לעולם לא שוב!
 
Posts: 44692 | Location: ...... I am thrice divorced, and I live in a van DOWN BY THE RIVER!!! (in Arkansas) | Registered: December 20, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
always with a hat or sunscreen
Picture of bald1
posted Hide Post
And then we have the "titles" Commodore and Senior Captain usually among commanders of ship squadrons.



Certifiable member of the gun toting, septuagenarian, bucket list workin', crazed retiree, bald is beautiful club!
USN (RET), COTEP #192
 
Posts: 16610 | Location: Black Hills of South Dakota | Registered: June 20, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of sigcrazy7
posted Hide Post
Doesn't it also depend on the job at hand? I remember the few times I got onto a Blackhawk, it didn't matter what anybody's rank was. We were all listening to the E4 15T.



Demand not that events should happen as you wish; but wish them to happen as they do happen, and you will go on well. -Epictetus
 
Posts: 8292 | Location: Utah | Registered: December 18, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Pyker
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by MikeinNC:
quote:
Originally posted by 83v45magna:
No has mention yet another Lieutenant, the Navy O-2 Lieutenant Junior Grade or J.G.

That complicates things just that little bit more.

Big Grin


A jg is addressed as Lieutenant Or sir, but in writing he is addressed as LTJG or LTjg....

Just like talking to an admiral lower half...you call him “Admiral” and leave out the lh....

CWOs are called “Sir” when writing you might just write CWO, it is also correct to write CWO2, CWO4, etc

And to confound it a little more....when an officer is in charge of a ship, regardless of his rank...he is addressed as “Captain”
(I was on one ship that had a Lt as CO, he was called captain, another a CWO was the CO, has was called Captain, and on another a Commander was the CO..he also was called Captain)


In the Royal Navy it's the same way. Historically, there wass only one 'Captain' on a ship, so if a Marine Captain was the OIC of a shipboard detachment, he was given an honorary (and temporary) promotion to 'Major' while aboard.
 
Posts: 2763 | Location: Lake Country, Minnesota | Registered: September 06, 2019Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Lunasee
posted Hide Post
This all sounds VERY military to me. LOL
 
Posts: 601 | Location: Hillsboro, OR | Registered: January 09, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by mbinky:
quote:
Plus 4 levels of Warrant Officers.


You mean 5? (at least for everyone but the Coasties) Smile

Warrant Officer is probably the best rank in the service. It fits in between nco and officer rank and addressed as Mister or Mame depending on gender.
 
Posts: 4472 | Registered: November 30, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Blackmore
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by satch:
Warrant Officer is probably the best rank in the service. It fits in between nco and officer rank and addressed as Mister or Mame depending on gender.




Harshest Dream, Reality
 
Posts: 3690 | Location: W. Central NH | Registered: October 05, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of arabiancowboy
posted Hide Post
I frequently work on missions in various joint task force organizations. I’ve never compared my date of rank with anyone. Chain of command is established by the organizational chart, and what role you play.

For example, I’ve commanded the air component within a JTF led by another O-5. But he’s the overall commander regardless of date of rank.

Bottom line- the commander is in charge. I’ve never seen it disputed. The only disputes I’ve seen are between ops and intel.
 
Posts: 2476 | Registered: May 17, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
semi-reformed sailor
Picture of MikeinNC
posted Hide Post
Another weird naval thing to further confuse or actually determine who is in charge or of the highest rank while tied up in ports is the flying of “third sub pennant” or SOPA..(senior officer Present afloat)

If several ships are tied up, one of them has to outrank the others, ie. When seven patrol boats are tied up in Miami..all the boats COs are LTs...one of them will be SOPA and that ship is the one other ships follow (This is why they check each other’s date of rank)when colors is raised or struck or SOPA may order other ships to move to other berths depending on necessity, SOPA can order all shipS to set to sea in time of disorder or a bunch of reasons....

And SOPA can change if a different ship pulls in and is of a higher rank.

But as others have intimidated, if it’s to be a naval operation or amphibious operation the ground guys will defer to the higher rank of the naval guys for him to lead his part of the naval operation, but when the ground guys hit the beach, they are led by their people.



"Violence, naked force, has settled more issues in history than has any other factor.” Robert A. Heinlein

“You may beat me, but you will never win.” sigmonkey-2020

“A single round of buckshot to the torso almost always results in an immediate change of behavior.” Chris Baker
 
Posts: 11568 | Location: Temple, Texas! | Registered: October 07, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Military folks... Chain of command in mixed service situations

© SIGforum 2024