SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    FNC reporting the Hilary's Email contained a "Top Secret" labeled message
Page 1 ... 311 312 313 314 315 

Closed Topic Closed
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
FNC reporting the Hilary's Email contained a "Top Secret" labeled message Login/Join 
Rule #1: Use enough gun
Picture of Bigboreshooter
posted Hide Post
Judge Nappy (Yeah, I know...I know...) thinks the Hag may have some problems here.

https://www.foxnews.com/media/...-server-william-barr

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton could potentially fight a ruling that she must sit for a sworn deposition before a federal judge, but she would have to ask Attorney General William Barr for help, Fox News senior judicial analyst Judge Andrew Napolitano explained Tuesday.

In an interview on "Fox & Friends," Napolitano said that the former presidential candidate would have to ask Barr to file an appeal on her behalf because the Department of Justice (DOJ) lawyers would be representing her in the matter.

While Clinton has argued that she has already responded to questions in regard to her use of a private email server to conduct government business, D.C. District Court Judge Royce C. Lamberth ruled that her answers left much to be desired. The matter, however, did not result in any charges after a high-profile investigation.

The ruling comes after conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch revealed at a December 2019 status conference that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) released "approximately thirty previously undisclosed Clinton emails" and that the State Department "failed to fully explain" where they came from.

"As extensive as the existing record is, it does not sufficiently explain Secretary Clinton’s state of mind when she decided it would be an acceptable practice to set up and use a private server to conduct State Department business," Lamberth said.

“The court believes those responses were either incomplete, unhelpful, or cursory at best. Simply put, her responses left many more questions than answers," he wrote.

"[The] Freedom of Information Act is a federal statute that allows anyone ... who seeks [them], copies of government documents," Napolitano remarked. "Judicial Watch has been trying to get copies of these documents. When they looked at the documents, some of which have been prepared by Mrs. Clinton, you heard what the judge said: the answers were deceptive, misleading, and generated more questions than they answered. Therefore, he ordered her to be deposed."

"She has never been deposed under oath on this," he continued. "She was interrogated, but not under oath, in a secret interrogation by the FBI three days before they exonerated her."

Additionally, he noted, this deposition will also be videotaped.

"She can't plead the fifth, right?" asked host Ainsley Earhardt.

"She can't plead the fifth because the statute of limitations to prosecute her for failure to safeguard state secrets has come and gone. She can't be prosecuted for that," he replied. "She could be prosecuted if she lies under oath in this deposition. She is represented in the deposition by lawyers form the Justice Department."

"The same Justice Department that would prosecute her if she lies under oath," he added.

While the date of the deposition is still to be determined, Napolitano told the "Friends" hosts he predicts it will likely be held in the spring or summer.




When a strong man, fully armed, guards his own house, his possessions are undisturbed. Luke 11:21


"Every nation in every region now has a decision to make.
Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists." -- George W. Bush

 
Posts: 14826 | Location: Birmingham, Alabama | Registered: February 25, 2009Report This Post
Member
Picture of pulicords
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Bigboreshooter:
Judge Nappy (Yeah, I know...I know...) thinks the Hag may have some problems here.

https://www.foxnews.com/media/...-server-william-barr

"She has never been deposed under oath on this," he continued. "She was interrogated, but not under oath, in a secret interrogation by the FBI three days before they exonerated her."

"She could be prosecuted if she lies under oath in this deposition. She is represented in the deposition by lawyers form the Justice Department."

"The same Justice Department that would prosecute her if she lies under oath," he added.


Hillary Clinton wasn't "interrogated" by the FBI (Interrogated=Confrontational and Accusatory Questioning). She was INTERVIEWED (simply asked questions in a non-confrontational/fact-finding manner) by the FBI with the assistance of private counsel by her side, who allowed and disallowed questions to be answered if they felt like it. A huge difference!!!

Obviously having DOJ provide counsel to the former Secretary of State and prosecute her is a huge conflict of interest (something Hillary knows plenty about as a lawyer). What could occur though is that her lying or misstating certain facts could reasonably be interpreted as "Obstruction of Justice", if such statements are made to members of the FBI or DOJ now. A "process crime"? Sure, but the whole point of using government emails and servers is to ensure that there isn't any "pay for play" or similar malfeasance among those we expect to be working for us (the taxpayers) versus themselves at our expense. I'm hoping the truth will come out.


"I'm not fluent in the language of violence, but I know enough to get around in places where it's spoken."
 
Posts: 10187 | Location: The Free State of Arizona | Registered: June 13, 2007Report This Post
Shall Not Be Infringed
Picture of nhracecraft
posted Hide Post
quote:
"She can't plead the fifth, right?" asked host Ainsley Earhardt.

"She can't plead the fifth because the statute of limitations to prosecute her for failure to safeguard state secrets has come and gone. She can't be prosecuted for that," he replied. "She could be prosecuted if she lies under oath in this deposition. She is represented in the deposition by lawyers form the Justice Department."

Seriously??? The 'Statute of Limitations on safeguarding State Secrets and/or Espionage Act violations has an expiration date....WTF !!! Roll Eyes


____________________________________________________________

If Some is Good, and More is Better.....then Too Much, is Just Enough !!
Trump 2024....Save America!
"May Almighty God bless the United States of America" - parabellum 7/26/20
Live Free or Die!
 
Posts: 8788 | Location: New Hampshire | Registered: October 29, 2011Report This Post
Conveniently located directly
above the center of the Earth
Picture of signewt
posted Hide Post
quote:
"She can't plead the fifth because the statute of limitations to prosecute her for failure to safeguard state secrets has come and gone. She can't be prosecuted for that,"


perhaps I've been previously misinformed; it has been widely discussed here before, that such 'statute of limitations' does not apply to such matters.

Can someone with actual legal knowledge clarify this for the rest of us?


**************~~~~~~~~~~
"I've been on this rock too long to bother with these liars any more."
~SIGforum advisor~
"When the pain of staying the same outweighs the pain of change, then change will come."~~sigmonkey

 
Posts: 9849 | Location: sunny Orygun | Registered: September 27, 2009Report This Post
Member
Picture of lastmanstanding
posted Hide Post
Once again Judicial Watch doing what the DOJ has no interest in.

quote:
Legal watchdog group Judicial Watch has served Google with a subpoena for all emails believed to be linked to an account used by 2016 Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton during her tenure as President Obama’s secretary of state.

According to a press release, the subpoena — which was authorized by a federal court in Washington, D.C. — Platte River Network IT specialist Paul Combetta reportedly accessed the Google account to move Clinton’s emails from a laptop to the firm’s servers before using a program called Bleachbit to destroy the emails and remove all traces of them the computer.


Link


"Fixed fortifications are monuments to mans stupidity" - George S. Patton
 
Posts: 8505 | Location: Minnesota | Registered: June 17, 2007Report This Post
Legalize the Constitution
Picture of TMats
posted Hide Post
Rick Ferran who posts as “Uncle Sam’s Misguided Children” put this up on his page this morning.
He does not source this story. There are two links attached to the post, one just a short blurb about the charges against Turi being dropped, the other about Ambassador Stevens and his manner of death; nothing supporting Stinger missile serial numbers, etc.

Look, this comes off as wild-eyed and slobbering conspiracy theory talk, but think...have you ever heard anything approaching a plausible explanation for the Obama Administration’s inaction during the Benghazi siege? Para, I’ll pull it immediately if it’s too far out there for the standards of your forum.

quote:
FINALLY!! - THE REAL REASON BEHIND BERGDAHL'S RELEASE, HILLARY'S SERVER BEING WIPED, and the BENGHAZI MASSACRE!

Here's the real Benghazi story:
Ambassador Stevens was sent to Benghazi to secretly retrieve US made Stinger Missiles that the State Dept had supplied to Ansar al Sharia in Libya WITHOUT Congressional oversight or permission! Sec State Hillary Clinton had brokered the Libya deal through Ambassador Stevens and a Private Arms Dealer named Marc Turi, but some of the shoulder fired Stinger Missiles ended up in Afghanistan where they were used against our own military. On July 25th, 2012, a US Chinook helicopter was downed by one of them. Not destroyed only because the idiot Taliban didn't arm the missile. The helicopter didn't explode, but it had to land and an ordnance team recovered the missile’s serial number which led back to a cache of Stinger Missiles kept in Qatar by the CIA.

Obama and Hillary were in full panic mode, so Ambassador Stevens was sent to Benghazi to retrieve the rest of the Stinger Missiles. This was a "do-or-die" mission, which explains the “Stand Down Orders” given to multiple rescue teams during the siege of the US Embassy. It was the State Dept, NOT the CIA, that supplied the Stinger Missiles to our sworn enemies because Gen. Petraeus at CIA would not approve supplying the deadly missiles due to their potential use against commercial aircraft. So then, Obama threw Gen. Petraeus under the bus when he refused to testify in support of Obama’s phony claim of a “spontaneous uprising caused by a YouTube video that insulted Muslims.”

Obama and Hillary committed TREASON! This is what the investigation is all about, WHY she had a Private Server, (in order to delete the digital evidence), and WHY Obama, two weeks after the attack, told the UN that the attack was the result of the YouTube video, even though everyone KNEW it was not.

Furthermore, the Taliban knew that the administration had aided and abetted the enemy WITHOUT Congressional oversight or permission, so they began pressuring (blackmailing) the Obama Administration to release five Taliban generals being held at Guantanamo. Bowe Bergdahl was just a useful pawn used to cover the release of the Taliban generals. Everyone knew Bergdahl was a traitor but Obama used Bergdahl’s exchange for the five Taliban generals to cover that Obama was being coerced by the Taliban about the unauthorized Stinger Missile deal. So we have a traitor (BHO) as POTUS that is not only corrupt, but compromised as well, and a Sec of State that is a serial liar, who perjured herself multiple times at the Congressional Hearings on Benghazi. Perhaps this is why no military aircraft were called upon for help in Benghazi, Because the administration knew that our enemies had Stinger Missiles, that if used to down those planes, would likely be traced back to the CIA cache in Qatar, and then to the State Dept’s illegitimate arms deal in Libya.


BTW, in 2016, charges against Marc Turi were dropped by the DoJ.


_______________________________________________________
despite them
 
Posts: 13166 | Location: Wyoming | Registered: January 10, 2008Report This Post
Glorious SPAM!
Picture of mbinky
posted Hide Post
1) Hillary Clinton is a criminal who violated numerous classification laws. Laws that would have seen you, or me, or anyone we associated with UNDER the jail for decades.

2) The Obama administration, his DOJ, and his FBI let her off. 5 July 2016 was the day I stopped seeing the FBI as a premier law enforcement institution and began to see them as the American Hating Stasi that they are.

3) She will never be held accountable for her actions. There is no political will; she is "too big to fail"; There are two tiers of justice in this nation. My only wish is that I am alive to celebrate when the Devil finally takes her black soul down to Hades where it belongs.

All of this wild eyed speculation is an utter waste of time.

The fight right now is to get Lt. Gen. Flynn free. That is what I am focused on.

Carry on, and please enjoy this Memorial Day. Semper Fi.
 
Posts: 10635 | Registered: June 13, 2003Report This Post
Banned
posted Hide Post
Name a decent democrat. They are all corrupt.
 
Posts: 1396 | Registered: August 25, 2018Report This Post
Character, above all else
Picture of Tailhook 84
posted Hide Post
Not so fast.

Link here

Federal appeals court overturns order for Hillary Clinton to sit for deposition on private email use

A federal appeals court on Friday overturned an order that would have made former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and her former chief of staff sit for a private deposition about her use of a private email server for government work when she served as the nation’s top diplomat.

A district court in March had granted conservative watchdog Judicial Watch its request to depose both Clinton and former chief of staff Cheryl Mills to depose them about topics related to the use of a server.

The case had arisen from a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request from Judicial Watch to the State Department. Clinton has argued that she has already answered questions about the controversy and should not have to do so again -- the matter did not result in any charges for the then-presidential candidate in 2016 after a high-profile investigation -- but D.C. District Court Judge Royce C. Lamberth said in his ruling that her past responses left much to be desired.

Judicial Watch had requested to question Clinton and Mills about the 2012 attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya, but was limited to questions related to their knowledge of the existence of emails and documents related to the attack.




"The Truth, when first uttered, is always considered heresy."
 
Posts: 2540 | Location: West of Fort Worth | Registered: March 05, 2008Report This Post
Member
Picture of ersatzknarf
posted Hide Post
judge appointed by barry?




 
Posts: 4917 | Registered: June 06, 2012Report This Post
Glorious SPAM!
Picture of mbinky
posted Hide Post
Yup. Judge Wilkins. If you listened to the Flynn mandamus hearing at all you can tell that he is a RABID leftist. His questioning of Flynn's lawyer was ridiculous.
 
Posts: 10635 | Registered: June 13, 2003Report This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Not sure which forum post it belonged in, since it's intertwined into many of them - but Department of State just released over 35,000 of her "missing" emails sent from her basement server setup.

Some afternoon reading material:

Department of State Index of Hillary Clinton's Emails
 
Posts: 486 | Location: DFW, TX | Registered: September 25, 2013Report This Post
Coin Sniper
Picture of Rightwire
posted Hide Post
I randomly looked at a dozen or so from my phone. Entire emails or portions were blank boxes.




Pronoun: His Royal Highness and benevolent Majesty of all he surveys

343 - Never Forget

Its better to be Pavlov's dog than Schrodinger's cat

There are three types of mistakes; Those you learn from, those you suffer from, and those you don't survive.
 
Posts: 37931 | Location: Above the snow line in Michigan | Registered: May 21, 2004Report This Post
Unflappable Enginerd
Picture of stoic-one
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Rightwire:
I randomly looked at a dozen or so from my phone. Entire emails or portions were blank boxes.
That’s odd, wedding planning emails? Wink


__________________________________

NRA Benefactor
I lost all my weapons in a boating, umm, accident.
http://www.aufamily.com/forums/
 
Posts: 6192 | Location: Headland, AL | Registered: April 19, 2006Report This Post
Member
Picture of trebor44
posted Hide Post
Whatever happened to the campaign promise of "I'll will have her arrested" per DJT? Oh yeah, it was followed up with some waffle (BE S) statement!


--------------------------------

On the inside looking out, but not to the west, it's the PRK and its minions!
 
Posts: 624 | Location: Idaho, west of Beaver Dicks Ferry | Registered: August 22, 2012Report This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
So far the reality is, no-one involved in so many traitorous acts has been punished, maybe in the future but not the last 3 + years. Plenty of we’re going to get them, more bread and circuses for us.
 
Posts: 5768 | Location: west 'by god' virginia | Registered: May 30, 2009Report This Post
wishing we
were congress
posted Hide Post
only scanned 20 or so. Many classified Secret
 
Posts: 19505 | Registered: July 21, 2002Report This Post
bigger government
= smaller citizen
Picture of Veeper
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by trebor44:
Whatever happened to the campaign promise of "I'll will have her arrested" per DJT? Oh yeah, it was followed up with some waffle (BE S) statement!


Have you ever seen anyone even remotely attempt to take on the DC/Clinton machine like the current DoJ is?




“The urge to save humanity is almost always only a false-face for the urge to rule it.”—H.L. Mencken
 
Posts: 9144 | Location: West Michigan | Registered: April 20, 2006Report This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Veeper:
quote:
Originally posted by trebor44:
Whatever happened to the campaign promise of "I'll will have her arrested" per DJT? Oh yeah, it was followed up with some waffle (BE S) statement!


Have you ever seen anyone even remotely attempt to take on the DC/Clinton machine like the current DoJ is?




No I have NOT, and I think it is outstanding!! The eternal pessimists can/will find fault with a free ice cream cone!!
 
Posts: 6601 | Location: Az | Registered: May 27, 2005Report This Post
Muzzle flash
aficionado
Picture of flashguy
posted Hide Post
quote:
The eternal pessimists can/will find fault with a free ice cream cone!!
But they will still eat it. . . . (Where's mine?)

flashguy




Texan by choice, not accident of birth
 
Posts: 27902 | Location: Dallas, TX | Registered: May 08, 2006Report This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 ... 311 312 313 314 315  

Closed Topic Closed

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    FNC reporting the Hilary's Email contained a "Top Secret" labeled message

© SIGforum 2024