quote:

Originally posted by nhtagmember:
The Islamic republic of Britain

The Islamists don't seem to have this problem with their women:

UK Proposes New Laws Giving Unmarried Women Access To Men's Assets

Men born in the 21st Century have an incredibly difficult uphill battle in front of them in face of a liberal establishment that has declared outright war. One of the key components of this war is the use of feminism as a tool to steal hard earned assets away from men so they can be redistributed to women (and to the government). This has been an ongoing scheme for decades under divorce law, which has led to a steep and dangerous decline in marriages and nuclear families.

In the past five years, men's movements have quietly but effectively begun opting out of the current paradigm. What some groups call the "red pill" or the "manosphere" is really just an effort to rebalance the scales to counter a system designed to neuter them. The rise of feminist narcissism among modern women has created a cancer within western society, and every aspect of social and political reform has been adjusted to cater to these radical women.

Yet another example of this trend is brewing in the UK, where lawmakers are proposing the most dramatic reforms to family law in decades. Liberal Democrats want the enforcement of "cohabitation laws" which would essentially treat any couple living together for more than three years as if they are married.

At present, unmarried people who live together don't have many specific rights around finances, property or their children if their relationship breaks down. This could soon change. In England and Wales, there are around 3.5 million couples who are not married or in a civil partnership but live together long-term, known as cohabiting.

These couples could soon fall under similar laws as those who are married as part of a government consultation that has divided opinions. Under the new plans, unmarried couples could gain rights to bring financial claims if they separate.

The problem is, the UK has a 42% divorce rate and 65% of those separations are initiated by women. Furthermore, in 89% of all divorces, men are required to pay alimony, child support and give up a large portion of their pre-existing assets. There is little doubt that the same rules will apply to unmarried couples who break up.

Critics argue that the laws are yet another weapon to squeeze men, stealing their livelihood and labor. And, another tool for giving women more political power and dominance in relationships. If women have all the financial leverage, then men can never truly fulfill their role as head of the household. Instead, they become pay-pigs and slave labor, ever fearful that their homes, their children and their savings will be taken away from them.

Long term live-in relationships have acted as a viable alternative for many men seeking to avoid marriage contracts and the risk of divorce. However, if cohabitation laws are put in place, men will have to avoid allowing women to live with them at all. It is as if leftists are attempting to close one of the few remaining loopholes benefiting men.

Women used to rely on their husbands to protect and provide, but feminism has replaced husbands with governments and corporations. Through DEI hiring practices, divorce law, unfair college admissions and scholarships, etc., these entities take from men to artificially elevate women, making marriage increasingly obsolete.

Men have responded with brutal efficiency. In the span of only a few years, women are discovering the well of available suitors has gone dry. Ladies looking for "high value" partners willing to get married are hitting a brick wall. Surveys now project that 45% of all women ages 25 - 44 in the US will be single and childless by 2030. The female loneliness epidemic has already started.

The reason? Political divides are one cause, but the behavior of feminists in general has led to their downfall. That is to say, for men the juice is no longer worth the squeeze. Over 50 years ago, getting married had benefits; women used to be homemakers and nurturers of family. Today, many women believe that they don't need to bring anything to the table; simply allowing men to toil in their presence is treated as a privilege.

This attitude has ripped a hole in modern relationships and men are walking away en masse.

With 50% of marriages ending in divorce, marriage has become a get rich quick scheme rather than a lifelong partnership built on mutual respect. Cohabitation would expand this poisonous habit to the extreme. Men will be targeted relentlessly. More and more of them are pushing for prenup agreements, and it is unlikely that many will accept the idea of paying out of pocket every time a woman wants to cut ties.

The laws would also, ostensibly, apply to same sex couples and in some cases women may have to pay, but these cases will be rare. As usual, the goal is to stifle and control men through their bank accounts.

https://www.zerohedge.com/poli...n-access-mens-assets

quote:

Originally posted by chellim1:
Liberal Democrats want the enforcement of "cohabitation laws" which would essentially treat any couple living together for more than three years as if they are married.

In a way that’s hardly new or limited to other countries.

In the US there has long been what is known as a “common law” marriage based on cohabitation. I don’t know all the ramifications, but some years ago an acquaintance decided to split up with a woman whom he’d been living with for a time. A fellow LEO who had a lot of experience with former marriages convinced him to go through a formal divorce process to end any marital privileges his “partner” might have gotten through a common law status.

This sort of thing is something I wonder about when I read about men not wanting to get married or even have anything to do with women*. For example, a one-night stand with a woman suddenly gives her a lot of power over a man under domestic violence laws, including his right to ever own a firearm. I am long past such considerations due to age and being faithfully married, but if I were 50 years younger and unmarried, they would give me things to think about.

* One woman blamed the availability of pornography and the willingness of men to masturbate rather than seek partners to satisfy their libido as a major reason for the decline of dating and marriage. That was, of course, just one more example of finding something else to blame other than many women’s attitudes and actions plus other societal changes for what is becoming common.

Shawn Ryan Interview with Christian "Obi Wan Nairobi" Craighead. Short version: UK is going after him for a bunch of reasons, including calling it an Islamic Terrorist Attack instead of just a Terrorist Attack, exactly as the Obummer Administration did. President Trump was the first and possibly only World Leader to thank him for rescuing Americans that day. Also is an interview with Meyli Chapin, one of the Americans rescued that day:



Well worth the time as it details how the UK government is screwing with troops, such as white soldiers who go to church are branded as white supremacists.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I am not much of a Podcast person but even at 5+ hours this one was well worth it.
Took me 5 days to and from work and an 1.5 hour trip each way to the boys soccer game to finish.

Very good. Sad what they are doing to him for sure!
Glad to have him as an American Citizen now.

Both my brother and I are senior widowers after long and happy marriages. We have no plans to "remarry" after experiencing the current dating scene and learning how the laws have changed to favor women exclusively. Better to enjoy our remaining years financially secure and relatively drama and free.

Of course they are. I have said and continue to say. gb is our biggest enemy and enemy of the free world such as it is now. We should help finish them off. Or at least not throw them life lines. They have earned their plite. Good riddance.

The Islamic Republic of Britain is now established.

^^^^^
If it looks like a duck; if it walks like a duck; if it quacks like a duck; then it must be the “Elephant in the Room” that no one dares to mention.

For those who are familiar in some degree, this base and another (Brize Norton) are in the Cotswolds, a mix of affluence and agriculture with Oxford on the Eastern edge. A variety of celebrities have their properties (incld. Clarkson's Farm) and farms, along with the residents who work the land. The upscale farm shop was started in this region.

Face-to-face with ‘bomb plotters’: Farmer tells of 999 call after stumbling on masked men

quote:

Driving home from a party in the early hours, a local farmer came across three seemingly abandoned white vans blocking a quiet country road.

Confused, she turned her car around. As she did so, she saw a group of masked men in balaclavas scattering into the trees and across the fields towards RAF Fairford, located only a few hundred metres away.

She drove off and called the police. When she stopped, she also messaged her local WhatsApp group and warned neighbours to lock their doors.

Less than 25 minutes later, the men had been arrested. Video footage recorded by a villager shows five men, shirtless, sitting on the ground in handcuffs in the middle of a road, surrounded by counter-terror police.

Armed police officers began going door to door and a few hours later a large cordon was in place, roadblocks were set up across the area, and the entire community had been forced to evacuate as army bomb disposal units investigated the suspicious vans.

"Thinking about it now, and what could have happened if they had tried to stop me from driving away, I am quite lucky," the farmer told The Telegraph.

"It is pretty incredible, realising you had a brush with potential terrorists face to face and may have foiled a terrorist plot. It was clear they had just got there. Thank God we spotted them."

The woman, who did not wish to be named because of concerns for her safety, said the vans struck her as being suspicious from the moment she saw them, as a phone number and lettering on the back of the vehicles appeared to be fake.

She said: "I just thought what the hell are they doing… I saw a group of Middle Eastern-looking young guys running off through the trees. Some of them had masks or balaclavas on, and they all scattered ahead of us as we drove back past.

"Some of them ran into the fields, and some of them turned to run towards the air base. We realised this was something pretty serious."

....

Same incident as this one?

https://sigforum.com/eve/forum...410043225#6410043225

quote:

Originally posted by Pipe Smoker:
Same incident as this one?

https://sigforum.com/eve/forum...410043225#6410043225

Same incident but thread linked not related to UK.


No word if any explosives were found, or if anything at all was found...practice run?
UK airbase terror suspects being released on bail as Iran denies connection

quote:

United Kingdom police are releasing five terror suspects on bail Monday after they were arrested on suspicion of a terror plot targeting a U.S. air base in Britain this weekend.

Laurence ​Taylor, head of ​Counter Terrorism Policing, confirmed that investigations into the five men are ongoing, "including ⁠that this may be actively committed ​by proxies ​or ⁠individuals either knowingly or unknowingly working on ⁠behalf ​of a ​foreign state." Meanwhile, the Iranian Embassy in the U.K. has denied any connection to the five men.

The Sunday night arrests came after a local resident and farmer in Gloucestershire told the BBC that she had called police late in the evening after coming across three white vans blocking a road near RAF Fairford air base. As she turned her car around, she told the BBC that her headlights illuminated a group of "hooded and masked men" who "panicked" upon being spotted and scrambled into a nearby woods.

Authorities identified the five men as "U.K. nationals," but did not offer any further details.

....

Like almost everything else at this time, this is speculation but one commentator has pointed out how many elements of what has been reported don’t fit a terror attempt very well. I don’t agree with all his ideas and comments, but he does make a few good points. If no explosives were actually found, that would make more sense of the fact that the arrestees have already been released on bail—even in the screwed-up UK these days.

In short he believes what is known makes somewhat more sense if the group was planning a diesel fuel theft from someplace rather than a terror attack. But only somewhat.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I47uWzopcd4