This was posted yesterday on The Conservative Treehouse. . .

"British MP Rupert Lowe Releases “Rape Gang Inquiry Report” – An Evil Has Fallen Upon Great Britain
June 16, 2026"

https://theconservativetreehou...-upon-great-britain/

. . .and I have only begun to peruse the damning 212 page report, but it is horrific as one can imagine.

Those who have been reading the report are posting some excerpts / passages in the 'comments' section.

There is a four-minute video summary embedded in the article.

The government of the U.K. has failed its citizens in the worst way possible.

No words.

Is Ireland still protesting?

quote:

Originally posted by nhracecraft:
I have no words...

I think we all knew it was bad but...having it laid out like that really drives home how complicit not just UK politicians are in this but, the police, the entire legal system, the medical professionals, the social service workers...this is outrageous, disheartening and infuriating.

They voted their way into this and they can't even shoot their way out.

This might be what's needed to unite Ireland with Britain, for a short while anyway.

Their governments as a whole are corrupt. Looks like they need to be introduced to Alabama Wind Chimes.

No firearms? Bring back the long bow...

quote:

Originally posted by nhracecraft:
I have no words...

The issue has some traction with the citizens, but not with politicians. Idk about the elites there. Similarly, we know hundreds of thousands of children were sex trafficked into the USA under Biden. Somehow the leftists here just don't care.

The evil depravity of the left is universal.

quote:

Originally posted by darthfuster:
I’m sure this point has been made before, but isn’t it instructive how the UK government disarmed the population asserting that same government is all the protection a subject needs? Then when the assertion fails, the response from the government is to further oppress to favor a politically preferred demographic. It’s all so corrupt. The better answer is ours. Each citizen free to arm himself for his own defense……..

I'm sure I'm biased as an American but I don't see how, from a purely natural law standpoint, the government can take away a person's ability to defend themselves without assuming the duty to do so itself. In simple terms, if you can't have a firearm in your home to protect you from a burglary, if a burglary happens you should be able to sue the government for failing to stop it. A right you can't legally defend is no right at all.

quote:

I don't see how, from a purely natural law standpoint, the government can take away a person's ability to defend themselves without assuming the duty to do so itself.

Great Britain doesn't even have a written constitution. Any commitment to natural law is purely theoretical. The Magna Carta was a great leap forward for Great Britain, but they seem to have regressed since 1215.

quote:

Originally posted by chellim1:
The Magna Carta was a great leap forward for Great Britain, but they seem to have regressed since 1215.

The Magna Carta was, originally, just a statement of rights for the nobility. The King was no longer able to just steamroll the nobles, there would now be some measure of restraint on the King's power. The peasantry, though, were still under the thumb of the King and the nobles. Over time, citizens gained more freedoms and more representation in government.

As I understand their system today, any judge in the country can create an entirely new definition of rights or limitations on the people with their verdict. Because there is no constitution as we have, legal precedent becomes the guiding law.

I wonder who all will face prison time for releasing that report.

quote:

The peasantry, though, were still under the thumb of the King and the nobles. Over time, citizens gained more freedoms and more representation in government.

It took the Great Plague/Black Death of mid-14th Century to bring about the end of feudalism. With up to 1/2 of the entire population of Europe dead, the survivoring population was able to demand more wages and freedom of movement within society and the economy.

One of the great ironies about the present state of laws pertaining to self-defense in the UK is that it wasn’t always that way. Indeed, one of the most influential legal authorities of the English-speaking world was Sir William Blackstone. (If curious, ask the Internet how his writings influenced early American law and judicial system.) Something he had to say in 1765 or so:

“And we have seen that these rights consist, primarily, in the free enjoyment of personal security, of personal liberty, and of private property. So long as these remain inviolate, the subject is perfectly free; for every species of compulsive tyranny and oppression must act in opposition to one or other of these rights, having no other object upon which it can possibly be employed. … And, lastly, to vindicate these rights, when actually violated or attacked, the subjects of England are entitled, in the first place, to the regular administration and free course of justice in the courts of law; next to the right of petitioning the king and parliament for redress of grievances; and lastly to the right of having and using arms for self-preservation and defence.” [Emphasis added.]

— Blackstone’s Commentaries on the Laws of England, Book the First - Chapter the First: Of the Absolute Rights of Individuals

Elsewhere Blackstone amplified the comment about the right of self-defense by pointing out that if we are attacked, any injury suffered isn’t something that can be rectified by appealing to the courts or other legal authority. We therefore have the right to defend ourselves right there and right then, not to ask for some sort of restitution later.

quote:

Elsewhere Blackstone amplified the comment about the right of self-defense by pointing out that if we are attacked, any injury suffered isn’t something that can be rectified by appealing to the courts or other legal authority. We therefore have the right to defend ourselves right there and right then, not to ask for some sort of restitution later.

A good basis argument for Stand Your Ground laws, such as Florida enacted, many areas had obligation to retreat laws in place that put good people in harms way.

Look at the influence that Russia and outside adversaries had on Rhodesia and Hong Kong. Do you honestly think they didn’t want the same thing that happened to the colony to happen to the home country?

The powers that be at the UK are either retarded or complicit with regard to their monumental decline. That treason should cost them all their lives. But by the time the people realize this it will be too late.

Serious talk of P.M. Keir Starmer stepping down on Monday. On reading the headline I was so briefly optimistic and then I read the articles and re-read the headline of this post. The U.K. is completely and utterly lost. The U.K. is mad, so they are going to kick the P.M to tthe curb and move more to the left.....

^^^^^^
“Keir Starmer appears to be on the brink of quitting – possibly as soon as tomorrow – as one of his Cabinet allies admitted the Prime Minister is facing up to 'political realities'.

An ashen-faced Peter Kyle, the Business Secretary, did not dismiss a growing expectation that Sir Keir will announce as early as Monday that he is to leave Downing Street.…”

https://mol.im/a/15917249

Cherrio, MFer.

Seven PM's in the last 10 years, yeah they're in trouble.

The Prime Minister's resignation was directly catalyzed by last week's by-election victory of Andy Burnham in Makerfield. Burnham, the fiercely popular former Greater Manchester Mayor, has long loomed as the "King in the North" and the ultimate threat to Starmer's sterile brand - according to many - of leadership. By securing a seat in the House of Commons, Burnham effectively checked Starmer into a corner.

With Burnham holding immense sway among rank-and-file MPs, the writing was on the wall. He now enters the upcoming leadership contest as the overwhelming frontrunner to be Britain's next Prime Minister.

https://www.zerohedge.com/poli...es-7th-leader-decade

quote:

Seven PM's in the last 10 years, yeah they're in trouble.

Why we don't have a parliamentary system.

IIRC, there was a time in Italy where they had practically a "government of the month."