SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Comet now! Court rules dad can't stop 7 y/o son from transitioning.
Page 1 2 3 4 5 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Comet now! Court rules dad can't stop 7 y/o son from transitioning. Login/Join 
Member
Picture of Tubetone
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ZSMICHAEL:
Yep, and try to get an countering decision, it will get pricey really, really fast.

An experienced psychologist would charge a significant amount for an independent evaluation, but it should not exceed the price of two kidneys. The problem is complex, controversial, and clinically complicated. If you are disagreeing with another professional you better have all your ducks in a row. That sort of thing adds to the cost. Many psychologists do not do forensic or child custody work because of the emotions involved, and the difficulty in dealing with the legal system.


The little boy is on video tape saying mom tells him he's a girl, punishing him if he does things different from that. (see my LINK above or that of oddball).


_______________________________
NRA Life Member
NRA Certified Range Safety Officer
 
Posts: 3078 | Registered: January 06, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
The little boy is on video tape saying mom tells him he's a girl, punishing him if he does things different from that. (see my LINK above or that of oddball).

^^^^
That would add to the cost, as the mother would be in need of a complete psychological evaluation as a result of that behavior. Still shy of the cost of two kidneys.
 
Posts: 17705 | Location: Stuck at home | Registered: January 02, 2015Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Get on the fifty!
Picture of Andyb
posted Hide Post
The "mother" should be jailed.



"Pickin' stones and pullin' teats is a hard way to make a living. But, sure as God's got sandals, it beats fightin' dudes with treasure trails."

"We've been tricked, we've been backstabbed, and we've been quite possibly, bamboozled."
 
Posts: 3631 | Location: OK | Registered: November 07, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Bolt Thrower
Picture of Voshterkoff
posted Hide Post
Stuff like this is probably why witches were burned back in the day.
 
Posts: 10081 | Location: Woodinville, WA | Registered: March 30, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Only dead fish
go with the flow
Picture of pessimist
posted Hide Post
Fortunately, the widespread outrage over this has had an impact.

ARTICLE

I hope this isn't the end of the matter though. The mother shouldn't have custody of the child at all. The Department of Family Services needs to intervene.
 
Posts: 1517 | Registered: March 25, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Eating elephants
one bite at a time
Picture of ffips
posted Hide Post
Thoughts that come to my mind:
  • It saddens me that these children will never know "normal" based on the desires of the parents to have 15 minutes of fame.
  • Why are the children's names shared?
  • Minors commit far more heinous crimes daily yet they are afforded the protection of anonymity and sealed records.
  • When will the lust for everything to be shared on social media no matter how right or wrong, big or small, or left or right stop?
  • When is enough enough?
  • This will end up as some made for TV production at some point.
  • Damn! Just damn....
 
Posts: 3587 | Location: in the southwest Atlanta metro area | Registered: September 10, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Get Off My Lawn
Picture of oddball
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by pessimist:
Fortunately, the widespread outrage over this has had an impact.

ARTICLE

I hope this isn't the end of the matter though. The mother shouldn't have custody of the child at all. The Department of Family Services needs to intervene.


This is good news, gives the father more leverage in dealing with this shit. Odd, this all happens after Gov Abbott's involvement, and national pushback Wink . Also exposes the "mother" as someone who should not take care of children, including hers.



"I’m not going to read Time Magazine, I’m not going to read Newsweek, I’m not going to read any of these magazines; I mean, because they have too much to lose by printing the truth"- Bob Dylan, 1965
 
Posts: 17569 | Location: Texas | Registered: May 13, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Baroque Bloke
Picture of Pipe Smoker
posted Hide Post
“A judge has ruled that a father fighting to stop his seven-year-old son from transitioning to a girl will be allowed to have a say in future medical decisions related to his child…”

https://mol.im/a/7611057



Serious about crackers
 
Posts: 9701 | Location: San Diego | Registered: July 26, 2014Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of erj_pilot
posted Hide Post
^^^^^
Well maybe a SLIVER of sanity is starting to seep through in this case. Good lord...



"If you’re a leader, you lead the way. Not just on the easy ones; you take the tough ones too…” – MAJ Richard D. Winters (1918-2011), E Company, 2nd Battalion, 506th Parachute Infantry Regiment, 101st Airborne

"Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil... Therefore, as tongues of fire lick up straw and as dry grass sinks down in the flames, so their roots will decay and their flowers blow away like dust; for they have rejected the law of the Lord Almighty and spurned the word of the Holy One of Israel." - Isaiah 5:20,24
 
Posts: 11066 | Location: NW Houston | Registered: April 04, 2012Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Telecom Ronin
Picture of dewhorse
posted Hide Post
Good to hear Texas will be investigating this situation.

Glad to hear some sanity prevailed
 
Posts: 8301 | Location: Back in NE TX ....to stay | Registered: February 12, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Little ray
of sunshine
Picture of jhe888
posted Hide Post
As I said before: the original custody decision, which carries along with it the right to make medical decisions, was made by a JURY not the judge. (A jury the dad asked for, by the way.)

The judge, who many of you criticised, has reversed the jury on that. While it doesn't happen often, judges can enter judgment notwithstanding the verdict in some circumstances.

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/...-transition-n2555326

This means the parents will have joint decision-making power on medical decisions, and therefore, the mom will not be able to act unilaterally.

Many of you were suckered by the reporting of "judge rules" when what the reporters should have said was "jury verdict is." The judge has done what you want in this case. It was bad reporting, and because you were primed to hate on a female, black, Democrat judge, you went off. You were wrong.

This case is a long way from over. But this boy will not be "transitioned" under the current set of circumstances.

As some of you know, I practice Family Law in Texas. This is a hot topic among us here. Lots of chatter about this case.

This message has been edited. Last edited by: jhe888,




The fish is mute, expressionless. The fish doesn't think because the fish knows everything.
 
Posts: 53414 | Location: Texas | Registered: February 10, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Thanks jhe888 for the clarity. I haven't been following this case too closely, but I'm glad the judge intervened as needed.


P229
 
Posts: 3981 | Location: Sacramento, CA | Registered: November 21, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Corgis Rock
Picture of Icabod
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by jhe888:
As I said before: the original custody decision, which carries along with it the right to make medical decisions, was made by a JURY not the judge. (A jury the dad asked for, by the way.)

The judge, who many of you criticised, has reversed the jury on that. While it doesn't happen often, judges can enter judgment notwithstanding the verdict.


I’m considering the time of the judge’s ruling. It comes after the verdict made the news and the state became involved.
As for the jury verdict, the judge has a good amount on control over it. The selection of jurors, who’ve evidence and testimony is admitted, and the instructions to the jury.
Taken together, my bet is on the judge have had a discussion with her superiors and the state.



“ The work of destruction is quick, easy and exhilarating; the work of creation is slow, laborious and dull.
 
Posts: 6066 | Location: Outside Seattle | Registered: November 29, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Bolt Thrower
Picture of Voshterkoff
posted Hide Post
The judge was scared to death of the national attention her case was getting, and did the right thing out of fear.
 
Posts: 10081 | Location: Woodinville, WA | Registered: March 30, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Uppity Helot
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Voshterkoff:
The judge was scared to death of the national attention her case was getting, and died the right thing out of fear.



Sometimes a little fear is good thing. James’s sorry excuse for a maternal unit now cannot unilaterally act to “alter” him.
 
Posts: 3218 | Location: Manheim, PA | Registered: September 04, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
delicately calloused
Picture of darthfuster
posted Hide Post
This smells like Munchausan syndrome by proxy



You’re a lying dog-faced pony soldier
 
Posts: 30004 | Location: Norris Lake, TN | Registered: May 07, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Res ipsa loquitur
Picture of BB61
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Icabod:
Taken together, my bet is on the judge have had a discussion with her superiors and the state.


^^^^^^
Judges don't have superiors except for a higher court (and the electorate for non lifetime appointments) and lower courts don't talk with higer courts about cases.
Finally, a judge would violate all sorts of ethical rules talking ex parte "with the state."
A good rule of thumb for news reports on court cases, by the media, is that they missed something critical, left something out, or just didn't understand what happened.


__________________________

 
Posts: 12662 | Registered: October 13, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Gad to hear the original story wasn’t the end. This whole saga brought to mind this quote by Malcom Muggeridge:

“Thus did Western Man decide to abolish himself, creating his own boredom out of his own affluence, his own vulnerability out of his own strength, his own impotence out of his own erotomania, himself blowing the trumpet that brought the walls of his own city tumbling down, and having convinced himself that he was too numerous, labored with pill and scalpel and syringe to make himself fewer. Until at last, having educated himself into imbecility, and polluted and drugged himself into stupefaction, he keeled over--a weary, battered old brontosaurus--and became extinct.”
 
Posts: 1015 | Location: Tampa | Registered: July 27, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Ammoholic
Picture of Skins2881
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by jhe888:
As I said before: the original custody decision, which carries along with it the right to make medical decisions, was made by a JURY not the judge. (A jury the dad asked for, by the way.)

The judge, who many of you criticised, has reversed the jury on that. While it doesn't happen often, judges can enter judgment notwithstanding the verdict in some circumstances.

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/...-transition-n2555326

This means the parents will have joint decision-making power on medical decisions, and therefore, the mom will not be able to act unilaterally.

Many of you were suckered by the reporting of "judge rules" when what the reporters should have said was "jury verdict is." The judge has done what you want in this case. It was bad reporting, and because you were primed to hate on a female, black, Democrat judge, you went off. You were wrong.

This case is a long way from over. But this boy will not be "transitioned" under the current set of circumstances.

As some of you know, I practice Family Law in Texas. This is a hot topic among us here. Lots of chatter about this case.


Is it normal for a judge to set aside a jury verdict this long after they issued it? Not knowing any better, I would think that judge would call for a recess or somehow otherwise indicate that she was considering overruling them?

Also for all the mentions of the judge feeling the heat, what's that all about? They should be impartial and follow rule of law not public opinion. Is it normal for a judge to change her ruling based on public outcry or are people misinterpreting what actually happened?



Jesse

Sic Semper Tyrannis
 
Posts: 21342 | Location: Loudoun County, Virginia | Registered: December 27, 2014Reply With QuoteReport This Post
His diet consists of black
coffee, and sarcasm.
Picture of egregore
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by jhe888:
As I said before: the original custody decision, which carries along with it the right to make medical decisions, was made by a JURY not the judge.

So twelve people (or however many it was) thought this forced "transitioning" was OK? That is even worse.
 
Posts: 29077 | Location: Johnson City, TN | Registered: April 28, 2012Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3 4 5  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Comet now! Court rules dad can't stop 7 y/o son from transitioning.

© SIGforum 2024