SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    The REAL California Secedes From The Coastal Lotus Eaters
Page 1 2 3 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
The REAL California Secedes From The Coastal Lotus Eaters Login/Join 
Gracie Allen is my
personal savior!
posted
quote:
New California Declares "Independence" From Rest Of State
CBS News, Jan. 16, 2018

With the reading of their own version of a Declaration of Independence, founders of the state of New California took the first steps to what they hope will eventually lead to statehood. XBS Sacramento reports they don't want to leave the United States, just California.

"Well, it's been ungovernable for a long time. High taxes, education, you name it, and we're rated around 48th or 50th from a buisness climate and standpoint in California," said founder Robert Paul Preston.

The state of New California would incorporate most of the state's rural counties, leaving the urban coastal counties (basically from just north of San Francisco down to San Diego - IC) to the current state of California.

"There's something wrong when you have a rural county such as this one, and you go down to Orange County which is mostly urban, and it has the same set of problems, and it happens because of how the state is being governed and taxed," Preston said.

But unlike other separation movements in the past, the state of New California wants to do things by the book, citing Article 4, Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution and working with the state legislature to get it done, similar to the way West Virginia was formed.

"Yes. We have to demonstrate that we can govern ourselves before we are allowed to govern," said founder Tom Reed.

And despite obstacles, doubters, and obvious long odds, the group stands united in their statehood dream.

The group is organized with committees and a council of county representatives, but say it will take 10 to 18 months before they are ready to fully engage with the state legislature.

This is not the first effort to split up California. In 2014, Silicon Valley venture capitalist Tim Draper submitted signatures to put a measure that would split California in six separate states.


My apologies for the author's "stream of consciousness" style of writing. Text at http://www.cbsnews.com/news/ne...-from-rest-of-state/

I have mixed feelings about this. On the one hand, I still see no reason to give the High Holy Snowflakes anything. On the other hand, this may be a chance for normal people in California to regroup so that they can flush out the Augean stables. Especially since they were smart enough to include all the reservoirs, streams and rivers.

If something like this caught traction, I have to admit I'd be tempted to head back and throw in with the movement.
 
Posts: 27306 | Location: Deep in the heart of the brush country, and closing on that #&*%!?! roadrunner. Really. | Registered: February 05, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Ignored facts
still exist
posted Hide Post
six separate states, all sending senators to the senate, thus giving us yet even more cronies. That's taking it a bit too far.

On the other hand, the state of Jefferson is a wonderful idea.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...oposed_Pacific_state)


.
 
Posts: 11159 | Location: 45 miles from the Pacific Ocean | Registered: February 28, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Raised Hands Surround Us
Three Nails To Protect Us
Picture of Black92LX
posted Hide Post
I have long been a proponent of splitting that state up.


————————————————
The world's not perfect, but it's not that bad.
If we got each other, and that's all we have.
I will be your brother, and I'll hold your hand.
You should know I'll be there for you!
 
Posts: 25756 | Registered: September 06, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of TigerDore
posted Hide Post
It would put a bunch of electoral votes back into the sane column. The Leftists will fight this tooth and nail.
 
Posts: 9043 | Registered: September 26, 2013Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Big Stack
posted Hide Post
For a new state to break off from an existing state, the existing state would have to approve. Given that the big population centers are dependent on resources of the rural areas, this is not going to happen.

It's a dead issue.
 
Posts: 21240 | Registered: November 05, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Gracie Allen is my
personal savior!
posted Hide Post
Why would the existing state have to approve? Virginia never approved the creation of West Virginia, did it?
 
Posts: 27306 | Location: Deep in the heart of the brush country, and closing on that #&*%!?! roadrunner. Really. | Registered: February 05, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Muzzle flash
aficionado
Picture of flashguy
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Il Cattivo:
Why would the existing state have to approve? Virginia never approved the creation of West Virginia, did it?
I don't know about WV, but IIRC current rules require that the state being split first agree to it (both houses of its congress), and then the US Congress has to approve it, too.

flashguy




Texan by choice, not accident of birth
 
Posts: 27911 | Location: Dallas, TX | Registered: May 08, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
fugitive from reality
Picture of SgtGold
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Il Cattivo:
Why would the existing state have to approve? Virginia never approved the creation of West Virginia, did it?


Virginia was part of the CSA at the time and didn't participate in the process. Wink


_____________________________
'I'm pretty fly for a white guy'.

 
Posts: 7126 | Location: Newyorkistan | Registered: March 28, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Big Stack
posted Hide Post
United States Constitution, ARTICLE IV, SECTION 3, CLAUSE 1
quote:
New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new States shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other State; nor any State be formed by the Junction of two or more States, or Parts of States, without the Consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned as well as of the Congress


quote:
Originally posted by Il Cattivo:
Why would the existing state have to approve? Virginia never approved the creation of West Virginia, did it?
 
Posts: 21240 | Registered: November 05, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Thank you
Very little
Picture of HRK
posted Hide Post
New Cali would have control of the water and timber and agriculture zones of CA, they could put as much resources into expanding the growth of their main income which will be wine, nuts and fruit.

LaLa Land will fight it.
 
Posts: 24498 | Location: Gunshine State | Registered: November 07, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Lawyers, Guns
and Money
Picture of chellim1
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by BBMW:
For a new state to break off from an existing state, the existing state would have to approve. Given that the big population centers are dependent on resources of the rural areas, this is not going to happen.

It's a dead issue.

You are probably correct.... for now.
BUT there is a HUGE divide forming in California which will only get worse with time. Also, many leftist are pushing a division as well. I don't think it's a far-fetched idea that the State could divide, however both sides will have to see some benefit for a majority of the California legislature to approve it.

The Liberal Enclaves of San Fangeles might look something like this:



As posted in Calexit thread:
https://sigforum.com/eve/forums...35/m/8870047314/p/20



"Some things are apparent. Where government moves in, community retreats, civil society disintegrates and our ability to control our own destiny atrophies. The result is: families under siege; war in the streets; unapologetic expropriation of property; the precipitous decline of the rule of law; the rapid rise of corruption; the loss of civility and the triumph of deceit. The result is a debased, debauched culture which finds moral depravity entertaining and virtue contemptible."
-- Justice Janice Rogers Brown

"The United States government is the largest criminal enterprise on earth."
-rduckwor
 
Posts: 24753 | Location: St. Louis, MO | Registered: April 03, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Muzzle flash
aficionado
Picture of flashguy
posted Hide Post
Excuse me for asking, but isn't Sacramento also part of the Liberal bastion?

flashguy




Texan by choice, not accident of birth
 
Posts: 27911 | Location: Dallas, TX | Registered: May 08, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
As a Californian, I like Chellim's map. Sac county is most probably only liberal due to all the State/Fed employees that Live there.
 
Posts: 166 | Registered: February 18, 2014Reply With QuoteReport This Post
My Time is Yours
Picture of davetruong
posted Hide Post
As a Californian, I am ashamed of the crap that happens in Sacramento. The criminals in this state has more rights than the law abiding citizens. If California was a country, we'd be #6...yet we are #48 in per pupil spending in the US. Shameful...just shameful


God, Family, Country.

 
Posts: 6085 | Location: Orange County, California | Registered: October 09, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by chellim1:
quote:
Originally posted by BBMW:
For a new state to break off from an existing state, the existing state would have to approve. Given that the big population centers are dependent on resources of the rural areas, this is not going to happen.

It's a dead issue.

You are probably correct.... for now.
BUT there is a HUGE divide forming in California which will only get worse with time. Also, many leftist are pushing a division as well. I don't think it's a far-fetched idea that the State could divide, however both sides will have to see some benefit for a majority of the California legislature to approve it.

The Liberal Enclaves of San Fangeles might look something like this:



As posted in Calexit thread:
https://sigforum.com/eve/forums...35/m/8870047314/p/20


If we got enough people to push hard enough - couldn't we just break that off altogether and float it 500 miles to the southeast?
 
Posts: 4979 | Registered: April 20, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of sigcrazy7
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by SgtGold:
quote:
Originally posted by Il Cattivo:
Why would the existing state have to approve? Virginia never approved the creation of West Virginia, did it?


Virginia was part of the CSA at the time and didn't participate in the process. Wink


Which means VA didn’t give approval, making the creation of WV extra-legal. The Washington government always maintained that the confederate states were continuously subject to its authority; ergo, subject to the US Constitution, including Article IV. This was the justification for the hostility according to Lincoln.

Which proves this one point. When you have the bigger gun, you get to make the laws, sometimes extemporaneously.



Demand not that events should happen as you wish; but wish them to happen as they do happen, and you will go on well. -Epictetus
 
Posts: 8292 | Location: Utah | Registered: December 18, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
We need this in Washington, complete with a wall.
 
Posts: 3123 | Location: Pnw | Registered: March 21, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
The Main Thing Is
Not To Get Excited
Picture of wishfull thinker
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by SgtGold:
quote:
Originally posted by Il Cattivo:
Why would the existing state have to approve? Virginia never approved the creation of West Virginia, did it?


Virginia was part of the CSA at the time and didn't participate in the process. Wink


Well, commie cali is part of mehico, so...


_______________________

 
Posts: 6554 | Location: Washington | Registered: November 06, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
His Royal Hiney
Picture of Rey HRH
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by flashguy:
Excuse me for asking, but isn't Sacramento also part of the Liberal bastion?

flashguy


Just base on Sacramento's less restrictive CCW permit process, I think it leans right. That the state government is in Sacramento does bring liberalism in there.



"It did not really matter what we expected from life, but rather what life expected from us. We needed to stop asking about the meaning of life, and instead to think of ourselves as those who were being questioned by life – daily and hourly. Our answer must consist not in talk and meditation, but in right action and in right conduct. Life ultimately means taking the responsibility to find the right answer to its problems and to fulfill the tasks which it constantly sets for each individual." Viktor Frankl, Man's Search for Meaning, 1946.
 
Posts: 20180 | Location: The Free State of Arizona - Ditat Deus | Registered: March 24, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Gracie Allen is my
personal savior!
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by BBMW:
United States Constitution, ARTICLE IV, SECTION 3, CLAUSE 1
quote:
New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new States shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other State; nor any State be formed by the Junction of two or more States, or Parts of States, without the Consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned as well as of the Congress

OK, so, time to start damming streams, blowing silt and brush into collector/distributor pipes, and just generally squeezing off the water supply. If CADOJ can't do anything about pot farms, meth cooks and copper strippers, it can't do anything about civil disobedience focused on cutting off water supplies to the coast until the coastal legislators agree to allow the split.
 
Posts: 27306 | Location: Deep in the heart of the brush country, and closing on that #&*%!?! roadrunner. Really. | Registered: February 05, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    The REAL California Secedes From The Coastal Lotus Eaters

© SIGforum 2024