quote:

Originally posted by 12131:
Scott Jennings is vindicated, and that lunatic bitch Laura Loomer should be put in an asylum.

The difference is that Jennings is genuine.

Not buying it.

Sure thing. People putting their reputations and careers at risk to perpetuate a claim that would have to be revealed as being a lie in short order. Yeah, that's what's going on. Hospital staff, senate staff, friends, relatives- they're all part of this conspiracy which simply cannot remain concealed for any length of time.

You bet.

quote:

Originally posted by old rugged cross:
I wouldn't go that far Q. After Para asked If I knew who he was I saw him on cnn on a newsmax segment. And his take on it was shakey at best and phony at worst.

You admitted that you didn't even know who he was, while many of us have observed him battling the GDCs all these times, yet you continue to indict him. Ok, whatever.

quote:

Originally posted by parabellum:
I'm certain they felt it was time to do this, what with Graham's sudden passing.

Gosh, he looks so lifelike. It's almost like he could talk to you.



.

ha ha ha! awesome...

https://x.com/TheUnitedSpot__/.../2076503929425477830

I’m having some doubts about that posting of McConnell holding that newspaper with his wife next to him. It could be a doctored AI photo.

As a Kentucky citizen and resident, I’ve been reading the Kentucky local newspapers and TV websites and there are some concerns expressing that his finger is on a “call button” and not an actual newspaper, and that the photo is from 2023 and not a couple days ago.

Unless it would be confirmed with Dem KY Gov Beshear standing next to him holding that day’s WashPost newspaper, I just don’t know.

AI is making everything too hard to believe anymore.

^^^^^^. grok says it's AI.

I know nothing of this sort of thing, but apparently there's some kind of code embedded in the photo that identifies it as such. Not to mention the newspaper anomalies.

I'm not saying the guy's dead, but this photo and statement are BS.

quote:

Originally posted by 2BobTanner:
AI is making everything too hard to believe anymore.

It's also being used as the most convenient excuse ever. Don't like what you see? Well, then, it's AI.

People simply aren't thinking. If the man is dead, then he can never again appear in public, and then, his demise will be undeniable. How long do you think that would take, after publishing this photo of him? A couple, three weeks, maybe? Where would the fakers be then? Their deception bought them a matter of days, at the cost of their reputation.

"Ha! You can't fool me!" No, there's no room to fool people who think everything is a ruse. They're too busy fooling themselves.

Figure it out. Mitch McConnell is alive.

quote:

Originally posted by Gustofer:
grok says it's AI.

Grok gets it wrong at times, surprisingly often, but let's ignore this when we get the answer we want.



Here:

Question: Grok, sometimes your assessment of authenticity of photographs is incorrect, yes? Sometimes, you assess an image to be AI, when it turns out that it's real.

Answer: Yes, that's correct. My assessments of whether a photo is real or AI-generated aren't infallible. I can and do get them wrong sometimes—both ways:

Mistaking a real photo for an AI-generated one (false positive for AI).

Mistaking an AI-generated image for a real photo (false negative).

Why this happens

Image authenticity detection relies on looking for subtle artifacts like inconsistent lighting, unnatural textures, anatomical errors, metadata issues, or statistical patterns that current generators leave behind. However:

Modern AI image generators (especially the latest versions of Midjourney, DALL·E, Grok's own image model, Flux, etc.) have become extremely good at mimicking real photos. They can produce images that fool even trained eyes and automated detectors.

Real photos can have compression artifacts, unusual lighting, or post-processing that mimics AI tells.

Context matters a lot—I'm better when I have the full image + surrounding details, but a single isolated photo is harder.

My training data has a cutoff, and generator techniques keep evolving.

I'm designed to be transparent about uncertainty. When I analyze an image, I'll usually give a confidence level and point out specific reasons (e.g., "the hands look slightly off" or "the lighting is too perfectly consistent"). But those are probabilistic judgments, not 100% proof.

quote:

Originally posted by Gustofer:
I know nothing of this sort of thing...

You don't say.

People actually prefer a conspiracy. Folks will choose a conspiracy theory over a much more plausible reality almost every time.

Truth is insipid and boring.

People are so worried about being fooled by governments, businesses, etc., that they fool themselves.

Occam's Razor- A thing should not be complicated beyond necessity, which, these days, is most often phrased "The simplest, most obvious conclusion is usually the correct one."

^ The most reasonable way to look at life.

quote:

Originally posted by parabellum:

quote:

Originally posted by Gustofer:
I know nothing of this sort of thing...

You don't say.

quote:

Originally posted by 12131:

quote:

Originally posted by old rugged cross:
I wouldn't go that far Q. After Para asked If I knew who he was I saw him on cnn on a newsmax segment. And his take on it was shakey at best and phony at worst.

You admitted that you didn't even know who he was, while many of us have observed him battling the GDCs all these times, yet you continue to indict him. Ok, whatever.

He did that to himself in his response imho.

I do not think he is dead. Could be though. At best he is not in his jeans on some sort of hospital bed.


They will play this out as long as it takes.


congressman from Tn. Tim Burchett feels like it is all amiss. Think he might he some insight as to the depths the swamp will go to get what they want? Yeah, I think he probably does. Yeah likes conspiracy's though.
Tell's it like it is in my book.

Jennings seems to be quite honest, a good friend in Kentucky knows him well, he's not out there covering for Mitch McConnell and company.

Theres really no reason to cover it up, and if they were, at some point a coroner would be involved and the state would have to produce a death certificate with the correct date of death.

Of course some conspiracy theorist will claim that the certificate and date were manipulated by someone, which is highly unlikely that qualified physicians at a top level facility and the county coroner have all conspired to hid his death, and have done so for weeks...

I mean, as they say in fencing, what's the point....

What’s their endgame?

Someone is trying to screw up a dead pool payout.

quote:

Originally posted by jljones:
What’s their endgame?

Well there is blocking the President at every turn. That goes back to 2015. And then we have the save act which these fuckers are going to do everything in their power alive, dead or brain dead to block for starters.

He’s already doing that while alive. Faking his death/faking being alive does nothing to gain except keep the conspiracy theory guys on overload.

He’s a lame duck senator. There is no gain.