RFK jr. isn’t doing anything noble, he’s stroking his large ego.
In doing so he may be helping elect Trump, but not due to some higher calling.
If he had any other last name, he’d be lucky to have more than .5% if that.

I cannot go for a candidate who has a dead worm in his brain. He has some very strange ideas.

^I saw that today and went WTH...

RFK Jr said a worm ate part of his brain and died in his head

Btw art imitates life. Pilot episode of House MD first broadcast Nov 16, 2004...

quote:

Originally posted by ZSMICHAEL:
I cannot go for a candidate who has a dead worm in his brain. He has some very strange ideas.

Is this even medically possible? And if so, how common is it?

It's called Neurocysticercosis. Considered rare, but does occur 1-2000X a year in the US. The video I posted actually explains it pretty accurately.

Neurocysticercosis can cause cognitive dysfunction, memory loss, difficulty focusing, and even psychosis as well as other physiological symptoms.

Robert Kennedy supports legal abortion up until birth.

I wouldn't leave it to the States... even if it's full term.

quote:

Originally posted by chellim1:
Robert Kennedy supports legal abortion up until birth.

I wouldn't leave it to the States... even if it's full term.

And yet, after explicitly saying that he supports the murdering of full term babies, he won't receive a fraction of the vitriol and near universal condemnation that Kristi Noem has received on a national level.

Robert Kennedy Jr.’s stance on late-term abortion could swing the election to Trump
By Gerald McGlothlin

In an unexpected twist in the current election cycle, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., an independent presidential candidate, openly declared his support for late-term abortions. This stance, articulated during a recent interview with podcaster Sage Steele, posits that women should have the autonomy to decide on abortions, “even if it’s full-term.” This radical position could significantly impact the 2024 presidential race, potentially benefiting Donald Trump more than any other single political move.

Political analysts had long debated which candidate would suffer most from Kennedy’s candidacy. Initially labeled a “spoiler,” the focus has shifted dramatically following his controversial declaration. This quantum shift could torpedo Joe Biden’s campaign by alienating his most liberal supporters who might now see Kennedy as a viable alternative. These supporters are increasingly viewing Biden as less dynamic, and Kennedy’s articulate, albeit controversial, position gives them a potent reason to shift their allegiance.

Kennedy, despite a speech handicap, continues to exhibit charisma and populist appeal, which resonates with a broad spectrum of voters. His prominent family name adds an additional layer of attraction, lending credence to his candidacy in the eyes of those seeking a fresh yet familiar alternative.

Moreover, another significant shift is likely among centrist Catholics and other socially conservative but fiscally liberal pro-life voters who were previously anti-Trump. Viewing Kennedy’s stance as excessively liberal on the abortion issue, these voters might hold their noses and vote for Trump.

Nicole Shanahan, Kennedy’s running mate, appears surprised and somewhat at odds with his position. Her response in the same podcast, and later reflections shared on social media, suggest a discrepancy in their campaign’s messaging on this core issue of conscience. Shanahan’s more nuanced view that “every abortion is a tragedy” contrasts starkly with Kennedy’s unyielding stance, introducing potential internal discord that could further influence voter perceptions.

Kennedy’s unequivocal support for late-term abortions is not just a mere policy position; it’s a game-changer in the political landscape of 2024. It has the potential to rearrange voter allegiances dramatically. Personality aside, Donald J. Trump looks downright stable in comparison to this radical declaration by the nephew of the late great President, John F. Kennedy, who by today’s standards, would be a conservative.

https://www.americanthinker.co...ection_to_trump.html

Well, I'll say this...Based on a some of his recent comments during interviews, etc revealing a few of his stated policy positions, he won't be stealing ANY votes from Donald Trump!

The Decline and Fall of RFK Jr.?
By John F. Di Leo

For months, election-watchers have wondered: will Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. make it onto enough states’ ballots to have an impact? Will he have the money to run a real campaign? And most importantly, who will he hurt more: Donald Trump or Kamala Harris?

One thing most didn’t expect was what happened on Monday, August 12: he was bounced from the ballot in the state he grew up in, on a technicality.

Now, election law has always been full of technicalities, and some of us would argue that there’s nothing wrong with that. Government is about compliance with the law, and if you’re too sloppy to comply on your very first responsibility — the paperwork that creates your candidacy — then arguably, you shouldn’t be in charge of writing, implementing, or enforcing the law.

Those of us who have been in politics a while have seen candidates bounced from the ballot for forged signatures on petitions, for missing a declaration or two, or even for incomplete pagination on the filing packet. And we usually don’t mind, as odd as it seems to outsiders, because we argue that if the candidate can’t be trusted to get these fundamentals right, then we can’t really trust him to keep campaign promises, or to notice pork that other pols sneak into bills, or to hold agencies to the line in department oversight.

But this week’s news was such a consequential violation that it was rather surprising.

RFK Jr’s nominating petitions identified him as a resident of New York State. A Democrat front group challenged his candidacy, claiming he doesn’t actually live in New York at all, and a judge ruled against him.

As it turns out, RFK Jr. has lived in California for the past ten years and only recently decided to rent a bedroom in New York state from a friend — a bedroom in which he has spent only one night since the verbal agreement commenced, apparently in May.

https://www.americanthinker.co..._fall_of_rfk_jr.html

^^^That's about the stupidest thing I've heard in quite a while in terms of unforced errors in politics. First, why does he feel the 'need' to be a resident of NY anyway? Regardless, he could've easily bought a house in NY if he 'really' needed to be a NY resident. AND he's an attorney, so you'd think he'd have some knowledge of the importance of staying within the hard lines of the law in NY (truthful statements, crossing 'T's and dotting 'I's & shit!), as well as any other state for that matter. Again, talk about an unforced error...

Of course, knowing what we know, and the track record of the 'Legal System' (and Judges!) in New Yorkistan, can one assume this is legit, or will it be overturned on appeal...someday.

quote:

First, why does he feel the 'need' to be a resident of NY anyway?

Because RFK Jr. selected a running mate from California: the very wealthy Nicole Shanahan.

Our system is designed to encourage (read: force) at least some degree of geographical diversity. Each member of the Electoral College is specifically banned from voting for two candidates from his own state. This means that if both candidates are from California, and they win the state of California in the General Election, the electors of the state of California would be unable to vote for their ticket.

^^^That may be the reason he needed to establish residency in a different state, but there are plenty of other/better states besides NY to choose from!

The Very Practical Reason Brian Fallon Rejected RFK Jr From Kamala Harris Camp

It is not difficult to understand why the Kamala Harris campaign, led on strategic coordination by Brian Fallon, rejected the efforts of Robert F Kennedy Jr to coordinate with the campaign. However, to understand the obvious reason a few realities must be accepted.

Prior to the switching of Biden with Harris, RFK Jr was polling around 8 to 12% in most commonly accepted polling results. After Kamala Harris replaced Joe Biden, RFK Jr ballot support dropped to around 4 to 6%. The reason was simple, the democrats supporting RFK Jr, disenfranchised with Biden, returned once he was replaced.

The current 4 to 6% support that remains with Robert Kennedy Jr are never-MAGA republicans, single issue vaxx voters and never-Trumpers. Why would Fallon want to interrupt that convenient fracture?

So long as the GOPe voters have an alternative, Kamala is in a good place. The campaign of Kamala benefits from RFK Jr wandering around the landscape of tenuous republicans herding potential Trump ballots into a convenient RFK Jr vote shredder. Fallon doesn’t want Kennedy to stop this process.

https://theconservativetreehou...is-camp/#more-263362

He’s trying to leverage the only value he has ever had in this election — the promise of delivering 3-5% of the voters to one side or the other. Obviously the Dems have either determined that he can’t deliver those voters or that they will vote D anyway.

Now he’s making his play to Trump to see whether Trump thinks he offers any value...

Time Running Out – Robert F Kennedy Contemplating Exit?

It looks increasingly like Robert F Kennedy notices the sand within his influence clock is running out fast. At the same time RFK Jr is sending this message, his VP running mate Nicole Shanahan says the Kennedy campaign is considering dropping out of the race and endorsing Trump.

The comments from Mrs Shanahan came during a podcast appearance with Tom Bilyeu’. Shanahan said there are currently two options:

#1. “Staying in and forming that new party, but we run the risk of a Kamala Harris and Waltz presidency because we draw votes from Trump…”

#2. “Or we walk away right now and join forces with Donald Trump.”

Interestingly, it appears Kennedy and Shanahan are admitting they currently take votes from President Donald Trump. They no longer take votes from Kamala Harris.

WATCH:
https://x.com/CollinRugg/statu...ontemplating-exit%2F



https://theconservativetreehou...ng-exit/#more-263432

RFK Jr Campaign Mulling "Joining Forces With Trump" Because We 'Run The Risk Of Enabling A Harris/Walz Presidency'

Just days after refuting reports that RFK Jr approached Harris for a cabinet position, his running mate, Nicole Shanahan just dropped a bombshell during a podcast that could change the race considerably.

Appearing on the 'Impact Theory' podcast (that was filmed yesterday), Shanahan said they are debating whether to stay in the race or drop out and join forces with Trump:

https://www.zerohedge.com/poli...arriswalz-presidency

quote:

Originally posted by chellim1:

quote:

First, why does he feel the 'need' to be a resident of NY anyway?

Because RFK Jr. selected a running mate from California: the very wealthy Nicole Shanahan.

Our system is designed to encourage (read: force) at least some degree of geographical diversity. Each member of the Electoral College is specifically banned from voting for two candidates from his own state. This means that if both candidates are from California, and they win the state of California in the General Election, the electors of the state of California would be unable to vote for their ticket.

Interesting info contained in this video from Russel Brand. Some of the material is duplicated from the embedded Colin Rugg tweet above and come from the same interview on Tom Bilyeu's Impact Theory, but there's a lot more in the Russel Brand video. At the very beginning RFK,Jr. puts forward some key statements that refute the claims that got him bounced from the NY Ballot, and are telling, once again indicative (proving?) that the 'Legal System' (and Judges!) in New Yorkistan, and obviously Leftist Democrats cannot be trusted, as they will do anything in their quest for power!

RFK, Jr. indicates 'his Driver's License in NY, his car is registered in NY, his Law License in in NY, he pays Income Taxes in NY...More than ANY other state'!

Have a listen...

Perhaps it is "time" for the right of the GDC/Marxist crowd to consider a "coalition" mindset and bring all but the die hard GDCs into a larger number in order to stop the madness that is the left and their relentless madness to drive everything over the cliff.

quote:

Perhaps it is "time" for the right of the GDC/Marxist crowd to consider a "coalition" mindset

I think anyone in the D party opposed to the GDC/Marxists is too gutless to oppose them. And who would that be? You would think Pelosi, but she goes along with Obama, who is for sure a GDC. Harris? GDC. Walz? GDC. Gabbard? Gone. RFK Jr? Gone. Manchin? Gone. Sinema? Gone.