quote:

Originally posted by Balzé Halzé:
We shouldn't forget that Tulsi is a full blown socialist and hardly a friend at all to what makes America so great. She's an enemy to the 2nd amendment and the spirit of capitalism. She's even backed the notion of a universal basic income. Despite all that, I still like her as an individual (which is why she's such a contrast to her Democrat opponents who I almost universally despise), but the fact is that she will never get my vote (goes without saying really) or even an ounce of support from me ever.

As I said it before, I hope the Democrats keep tearing her down because she's the only one on that side that gives me any concern if she should somehow get the nomination.

Now, a third party run...I think I could get behind that.

Well said Allen. I couldn’t agree more.

quote:

Originally posted by Balzé Halzé:
We shouldn't forget that Tulsi is a full blown socialist and hardly a friend at all to what makes America so great. She's an enemy to the 2nd amendment and the spirit of capitalism. She's even backed the notion of a universal basic income. Despite all that, I still like her as an individual (which is why she's such a contrast to her Democrat opponents who I almost universally despise), but the fact is that she will never get my vote (goes without saying really) or even an ounce of support from me ever.

I don't think anyone here supporting her lashing back at Hillary has any illusions about what Gabbard is - a GDC of a lesser degree.

Let’s not forget Tulsi endorsed Bernie in 2016.
I respect her for her military service, which is a lot more than any other of the commies running. But at the end of the day they are all commies

quote:

Originally posted by RHINOWSO:

quote:

Originally posted by Balzé Halzé:
We shouldn't forget that Tulsi is a full blown socialist and hardly a friend at all to what makes America so great. She's an enemy to the 2nd amendment and the spirit of capitalism. She's even backed the notion of a universal basic income. Despite all that, I still like her as an individual (which is why she's such a contrast to her Democrat opponents who I almost universally despise), but the fact is that she will never get my vote (goes without saying really) or even an ounce of support from me ever.

I don't think anyone here supporting her lashing back at Hillary has any illusions about what Gabbard is - a GDC of a lesser degree.

I’m not sure she is any less of a GDC. I think the difference is that while she is a GDC, she appears to have honorably served in the military and she appears to be a personable human being with an actual moral compass. None of that excuses her being a GDC, but it beat the heck out of being a corrupt, vile, venal, bile soaked shrew who never thought of anyone but herself and never served anyone but herself and her own interests.

I'm wondering just who around here needs all these cautions that Tulsi Gabbard isn't our friend. She's kicking Hillary Clinton in the ass after Hillary decided to pick a fight. That's why she's being praised. What's unclear about this?

Just because we like how Tulsi responded to Hillary doesn't mean we should lose sight of Tulsi's socialist agenda. I'll agree with her wholeheartedly as she smacks Hillary down, but I would never vote for her. She's a Democrat after all!

quote:

Originally posted by synthplayer:
Just because we like how Tulsi responded to Hillary doesn't mean we should lose sight of Tulsi's socialist agenda. I'll agree with her wholeheartedly as she smacks Hillary down, but I would never vote for her. She's a Democrat after all!

Yes, yes, yes. Of course. I don't think anyone reading this would vote for her.

However, we should recognize this for what it is. Tulsi Gabbard is the first DEMOCRAT to stand up to the Queen in a meaningful way. It's a big deal. It's the moment in time when someone points at Hillary and shouts: "the Queen has no clothes!". Everyone in the room has known for some time now that she has no clothes, but no one would dare say so. Now, it's been noticed, and said. She's been exposed.

It's the end of the Clinton era, politically. She won't run. Well, she could ... but it would be a disaster for herself and for the Democrats.

This is political gold for the GOP.

I see this as a tiny but ominous fissure in the iron curtain of democrat commie solidarity. Perhaps she'll be but the first to eventually tear it wide open and expose the commies within as the traitors they are while steering the party back to the left of center. Or not. She has my attention though since literally no one else has the guts to return fire to the shrew.

quote:

Originally posted by darthfuster:
She has my attention though since literally no one else has the guts to return fire to the shrew.

...attention AND respect, from me. I don't agree with her politics in the LEAST bit, but I can respect her military service and sacrifice to this country, no matter her politics. I'd say she has some brass ones to go up against the Hag and her regime (speaking of regimes). A lot of folks doing so have wound up (mysteriously) in a body bag. I wish her safety from that winch. Doesn't mean I want her anywhere near The White House though...

https://babylonbee.com/news/hi...JCaF8G9PKH4J4OFQ6cxk

Tulsi Gabbard is a traitor, Jill Stein is a Russian Asset, Donald Trump colludes with Putin … I have heard HRC's rants described as neo-McCarthyism. She sees spies, traitors and dupes everywhere. Or is she unhinged as Jill Stein says?

I think it's both.

quote:

She sees spies, traitors and dupes everywhere. Or is she unhinged as Jill Stein says?

I think it's both.

Perhaps it projection.

I unfortunately heard the interview on the radio the other day and it sounded like she's ready for a straight jacket. I can't imagine how anyone could think she's not crazy.

quote:

Originally posted by a1abdj:

Perhaps it projection.

My thought exactly!

Time once again for my favorite leftist, Jimmy Dore. For some interesting information, go to the 9:25 mark.

Gabbard continues the bombardment with another full salvo on the Queen of Warmongers.



I'm sure the DNC wish they both would just go away, alas, it's not to be...

From the Babylon Bee (SATIRE)



https://babylonbee.com/news/hi...k7fsqdzRDsv1E0m2OUE0


Hillary Clinton Accidentally Posts Condolences For Tulsi Gabbard's Suicide One Day Early



U.S.—Oops! A social media scheduling error apparently caused Hillary Clinton to post her condolences for Tulsi Gabbard's suicide one day early.

This morning, Clinton posted that she felt "great sadness" at hearing that Gabbard had killed herself. In subsequent tweets, she detailed how "tragic" it was that Gabbard had broken her own kneecaps, stuck her feet in concrete, then tossed herself off the docks near a seedy warehouse.

"It's just terrible what happened, and though we disagreed, I hope we can all take a few minutes to send thoughts and prayers to the family," Clinton concluded.

The post was deleted several hours later after the Clinton team realized it was scheduled for October 23, not October 24 as originally intended.

At publishing time, Clinton had accidentally posted early condolences for the unfortunate suicide of the social media manager who had OK'd the post and subsequently posted more condolences for the new social media manager, etc.



.

There is so much going on that is very confusing.

Have you heard this:

https://twitter.com/Timcast/st.../1187036978463891456

NYT just stealth edited the original story about Hillary Clinton to claim that she didnt say the Russians were grooming Tulsi But that Republicans were

There is no correction, no notice, this was done quietly

quote:

Originally posted by sdy:
There is so much going on that is very confusing.

Have you heard this:

https://twitter.com/Timcast/st.../1187036978463891456

NYT just stealth edited the original story about Hillary Clinton to claim that she didnt say the Russians were grooming Tulsi But that Republicans were.

There is no correction, no notice, this was done quietly

I wonder if the NYT editor was Winston Smith (?)