quote:

Originally posted by Woodman:
Thanks, but I want the inner surface composed of at least three surfaces.

I almost bought the Speer bullets in our Classified to test another theory on equidistant points on a sphere.

So a trickier sphere puzzle, still with three pieces, for Madam Representative to solve ...

Run a plane through the sphere center perpendicular to the section axis (temporarily dividing it into 6 pieces) and rotate the upper half a little bit; joint the tops and bottoms together--bingo, 3 identical pieces with complex interiors.

flashguy

quote:

Originally posted by patw:
I don't know if this has been posted but she is supposed to be on 60 minutes tomorrow night.

Will 60 Minutes expose her for the dangerous and ignorant lightweight she is????

quote:

Originally posted by flashguy:

quote:

Originally posted by Woodman:
Thanks, but I want the inner surface composed of at least three surfaces.

I almost bought the Speer bullets in our Classified to test another theory on equidistant points on a sphere.

So a trickier sphere puzzle, still with three pieces, for Madam Representative to solve ...

Run a plane through the sphere center perpendicular to the section axis (temporarily dividing it into 6 pieces) and rotate the upper half a little bit; joint the tops and bottoms together--bingo, 3 identical pieces with complex interiors.

flashguy

"Boeing or Airbus?" Congressman Hey Macarena

quote:

Originally posted by trapper189:

"Boeing or Airbus?" Congressman Hey Macarena

Damn. Funny morning.

---

This is not going to end well.

Rep. Ocasio-Cortez Defends Rep. Tlaib's Use of Profanity Against President Trump

http://time.com/5494817/ocasio...nds-tlaib-profanity/

I check this thread often to read the replies because they are awesome.

quote:

Originally posted by jljones:
I check this thread often to read the replies because they are awesome.

Likewise, but this page and the last are light on the meme comedy gold. Not, that the text isn’t equally humorous of course.

I am sure the 60 Minute interview will be non-biased. I just can't believe they are giving her the reigns, even with the liberal mindset.

Any questions?

And this is just getting started!

Have to wonder if the democraPs are able to figure out just how much damage these 2 twits are doing. Nah, they think it is exactly what they need to beat Trump in 2020.

quote:

Originally posted by Elk Hunter:
And this is just getting started!

Have to wonder if the democraPs are able to figure out just how much damage these 2 twits are doing. Nah, they think it is exactly what they need to beat Trump in 2020.

I hope they continue to think so....

flashguy

In an interview with Anderson Cooper on "60 Minutes," Ocasio-Cortez discussed being given four Pinocchios by the Washington Post over her tweet claiming that $21 trillion in “Pentagon accounting errors” could’ve paid for two-thirds of her Medicare-for-all proposal, arguing that people shouldn’t focus on the details of what she says, but rather on the morality of her overall argument.


Cortez:

“If people want to really blow up one figure here or one word there, I would argue that they’re missing the forest for the trees,”

“There's a lot of people more concerned about being precisely, factually, and semantically correct than about being morally right.”

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/...bout-things-n2538586

just "one figure here, one word there"

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

https://www.powerlineblog.com/...s-the-tippy-tops.php

"When it comes to the state of the art on the left, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is the tippy tops. She is an idiot’s idiot with a little girl voice that gives expressive form to her thoughts and dreams. If only she were given absolute power, she could produce the kind of rapid change that has reduced Venezuela to poverty and starvation."

“There's a lot of people more concerned about being precisely, factually, and semantically correct than about being morally right.”

It’s the leftist creed...Facts don’t matter, feelings do.

What a vapid, ignorant, foolish child. It’s time for the republicans in Congress to take the gloves off and truly embarrass this politically retarded moron.

Morally right? Since when is the left concerned with morality?

My libtard friends are fully embracing this imbecile. They don't care who they support as long as they are super retarded progressive.

quote:

Originally posted by sdy:

“If people want to really blow up one figure here or one word there, I would argue that they’re missing the forest for the trees,”

"Forest for the trees." Uh huh.

I'd bet a $20 spot of someone else's money that she has only just been introduced to that phrase like a week ago. "Vapid" is about right. This woman has zero substance.

Vacuous imbecile.

quote:

“There's a lot of people more concerned about being precisely, factually, and semantically correct than about being morally right.”

I wonder if anyone (surely not her fans, but someone) will point out to this person that the morality of any argument depends on the facts of the argument. We tell children, “Thou shalt not kill,” but tell adults like soldiers and police officers the specifics of when killing is justified, or even required.
If I say we should spend less on X and more on Y because we’re spending A amount on X and B amount on Y, and that’s immoral, then the specifics of A and B truly matter.

quote:

Originally posted by Wayniac:
“There's a lot of people more concerned about being precisely, factually, and semantically correct than about being morally right.”

It’s the leftist creed...Facts don’t matter, feelings do.

Or more aptly, severe mental illness. When reality doesn't matter, and one lives in and rabidly clings to a fantasy world, mental illness is the only diagnosis that fits.

quote:

Originally posted by sigfreund:

quote:

“There's a lot of people more concerned about being precisely, factually, and semantically correct than about being morally right.”

I wonder if anyone (surely not her fans, but someone) will point out to this person that the morality of any argument depends on the facts of the argument. We tell children, “Thou shalt not kill,” but tell adults like soldiers and police officers the specifics of when killing is justified, or even required.
If I say we should spend less on X and more on Y because we’re spending A amount on X and B amount on Y, and that’s immoral, then the specifics of A and B truly matter.

But you're speaking as a person grounded in reason. See my post immediately above for why this can't and won't work with the likes of Cortez.

quote:

Originally posted by gearhounds:
What a vapid, ignorant, foolish child. It’s time for the republicans in Congress to take the gloves off and truly embarrass this politically retarded moron.

The Repub's need only sit back and let this moron speak. Occasional Cortex will flame out all on her own. IMO the best Meme out here is the one with the caption..."Never let someone who's accomplished nothing in their life, tell you how to accomplish anything in yours."

quote:

Morally right? Since when is the left concerned with morality?

Its not just the left. When has 'government' ever been morally right, and why would we entrust it with the moral foundation on anything.