SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    B-21 bomber to be unveiled Dec. 2
Page 1 2 3 4 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
B-21 bomber to be unveiled Dec. 2 Login/Join 
Legalize the Constitution
Picture of TMats
posted Hide Post
quote:
originally posted by Hound Dog:
Add yet ANOTHER new bomber that came out to 'replace' the BUFF (slang for B-52 - Big Ugly Fat Fellow).

Fellow? Is this the Hallmark Channel?


_______________________________________________________
despite them
 
Posts: 13759 | Location: Wyoming | Registered: January 10, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Fire begets Fire
Picture of SIGnified
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by TMats:
quote:
originally posted by Hound Dog:
Add yet ANOTHER new bomber that came out to 'replace' the BUFF (slang for B-52 - Big Ugly Fat Fellow).

Fellow? Is this the Hallmark Channel?


Big Grin





"Pacifism is a shifty doctrine under which a man accepts the benefits of the social group without being willing to pay - and claims a halo for his dishonesty."
~Robert A. Heinlein
 
Posts: 26758 | Location: dughouse | Registered: February 04, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Drill Here, Drill Now
Picture of tatortodd
posted Hide Post
I read this AM that the new B-21 is 3/4 billion each.



Ego is the anesthesia that deadens the pain of stupidity

DISCLAIMER: These are the author's own personal views and do not represent the views of the author's employer.
 
Posts: 23954 | Location: Northern Suburbs of Houston | Registered: November 14, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by tatortodd:
I read this AM that the new B-21 is 3/4 billion each.


Compared to the B-2 which rings in at $2+ billion, sounds like a bargain
 
Posts: 15195 | Location: Wine Country | Registered: September 20, 2000Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Lost
Picture of kkina
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by tatortodd:
I read this AM that the new B-21 is 3/4 billion each.

About the same as the B-2, until you factor in inflation, which then drives the latter to $2 billion. Such a deal. Let's hope we don't crash one of these.



ACCU-STRUT FOR MINI-14
"First, Eyes."
 
Posts: 17224 | Location: SF Bay Area | Registered: December 11, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Not as lean, not as mean,
Still a Marine
Picture of Gibb
posted Hide Post
The price tag is also reflective of the expected contract order size. R&D gets divided over the number of build units.

The B-2 was expected to have 100 units, it was shortened to 21 with the fall of the Soviet Union. The remaining design costs were added to the 21 units increasing the price significantly.

If Congress allows a full build out, the price per unit for the B-21 will seem like a bargain compared to the B-2. If they slash the number of aircraft, the price would seem more comparable.




I shall respect you until you open your mouth, from that point on, you must earn it yourself.
 
Posts: 3401 | Location: Southern Maine | Registered: February 10, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
The Unmanned Writer
Picture of LS1 GTO
posted Hide Post
Next week they see if the SAE built engines will fit into metric airframe. Big Grin

Engines built by Rolls-Royce.






Life moves pretty fast. If you don't stop and look around once in a while, you could miss it.



"If dogs don't go to Heaven, I want to go where they go" Will Rogers

The definition of the words we used, carry a meaning of their own...



 
Posts: 14257 | Location: It was Lat: 33.xxxx Lon: 44.xxxx now it's CA :( | Registered: March 22, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Purveyor of Death
and Destruction
Picture of walker77
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by LS1 GTO:
Next week they see if the SAE built engines will fit into metric airframe. Big Grin

Engines built by Rolls-Royce.


Confused

Engines are the same used in the F-35 which is made by Pratt & Whitney

The B-52 is using Rolls Royce engines.
 
Posts: 7412 | Location: Raymore, Missouri | Registered: June 24, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Guess I should have expected the long speeches and short aircraft display. What I didn't expect was a "personalized" version of the National Anthem from a government entity but Biden's tentacles reach far. I am so tired of these singers making the Anthem "theirs". Play it and sing it like it is written. Disgruntled Old Fart! i.e. One of the old white guys the progs can't tolerate and proud of it! Plan on sticking around for as long as I can to piss them off.



The “POLICE"
Their job Is To Save Your Ass,
Not Kiss It

The muzzle end of a .45 pretty much says "go away" in any language - Clint Smith
 
Posts: 2986 | Location: See der Rabbits, Iowa | Registered: June 12, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Baroque Bloke
Picture of Pipe Smoker
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by walker77:
quote:
Originally posted by LS1 GTO:
Next week they see if the SAE built engines will fit into metric airframe. Big Grin

Engines built by Rolls-Royce.


Confused

Engines are the same used in the F-35 which is made by Pratt & Whitney
<snip>

Does that mean that the B-21 engines have afterburners?



Serious about crackers
 
Posts: 9699 | Location: San Diego | Registered: July 26, 2014Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Purveyor of Death
and Destruction
Picture of walker77
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Pipe Smoker:
quote:
Originally posted by walker77:
quote:
Originally posted by LS1 GTO:
Next week they see if the SAE built engines will fit into metric airframe. Big Grin

Engines built by Rolls-Royce.


Confused

Engines are the same used in the F-35 which is made by Pratt & Whitney
<snip>

Does that mean that the B-21 engines have afterburners?


I wondered the same thing. The article I read said they were modified F-35 engines. I would assume the afterburner was removed since it's a sub sonic bomber.

It seems like a really small engine to power that big of a plane.

The article said they chose that engine for cost savings due to parts availability.
 
Posts: 7412 | Location: Raymore, Missouri | Registered: June 24, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Official Space Nerd
Picture of Hound Dog
posted Hide Post
Engines and afterburners are separate components. . .

So, I serioysly doubt the B-21 has afterburners.



Fear God and Dread Nought
Admiral of the Fleet Sir Jacky Fisher
 
Posts: 21968 | Location: Hobbiton, The Shire, Middle Earth | Registered: September 27, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Stuck on
himself
posted Hide Post
Smaller engine, smaller airframe? Or maybe just cost. Either way, thrust. But supersonic speed in a stealth bomber isn’t necessary, you want to be as quiet and invisible as possible. Afterburners have a large IR signature.
 
Posts: 4177 | Registered: January 23, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Good discussion keeping things in perspective.

Unlike the B-2, this new plane isn't completely revolutionary as many internal components are currently in-use which helps reduce supply chain complications. Simply updating the flying-wing design to a more simplified but, modern creation.

 
Posts: 15195 | Location: Wine Country | Registered: September 20, 2000Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Official Space Nerd
Picture of Hound Dog
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by TMats:
quote:
originally posted by Hound Dog:
Add yet ANOTHER new bomber that came out to 'replace' the BUFF (slang for B-52 - Big Ugly Fat Fellow).

Fellow? Is this the Hallmark Channel?


I won't use that vulgar language in polite society.

I spent 23+ years in the USAF, so I know that a lot of military life revolves around foul language. I just choose to use other words to explain/describe.

Our history is festooned with such 'colorful metaphors' - BUFF, SLUF (Short Littel Ugly Fellow - the A-7 Corsair II), FUBAR (Fouled Up Beyond All Recogntion), JANFO (Joint Army/Navy Foul Up), FIGMO (F- It; Got My Orders, meaning you were leaving the current unit for another assignment). . . I even came up with SNAFUBAR - Situation Normal: All Fouled Up Beyond All Recognition).

I won't apologize for not using bad language.



Fear God and Dread Nought
Admiral of the Fleet Sir Jacky Fisher
 
Posts: 21968 | Location: Hobbiton, The Shire, Middle Earth | Registered: September 27, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Purveyor of Death
and Destruction
Picture of walker77
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by corsair:
Good discussion keeping things in perspective.

Unlike the B-2, this new plane isn't completely revolutionary as many internal components are currently in-use which helps reduce supply chain complications. Simply updating the flying-wing design to a more simplified but, modern creation.

[FLASH_VIDEO]<iframe frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/V9IT-Omx5cI" title="YouTube video player" width="560"></iframe>[/FLASH_VIDEO]


Watching this now. There were 2 things that really surprised me.

1. USA is the only country in NATO that has bombers. Russia and China are the only other countries that have bombers.

2. Because of the point above, the Pentagon is considering sales to other countries. Currently Australia is very interested.
 
Posts: 7412 | Location: Raymore, Missouri | Registered: June 24, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by walker77:

Watching this now. There were 2 things that really surprised me.

1. USA is the only country in NATO that has bombers. Russia and China are the only other countries that have bombers.

2. Because of the point above, the Pentagon is considering sales to other countries. Currently Australia is very interested.

The countries that actually have a dedicated bomber is surprisingly small. I believe the UK's last bomber was the Vulcan, which was apart of their nuclear deterrence mission however with the shrinkage of their budget and the introduction of the Trident SLBM, the RAF shifted their nuclear mission to tactical delivery. To date, I believe the only nuclear capable aircraft in Europe is the F-16 and any remaining strike variant Tornado's; the F-35 is not yet certified.

Australia has been getting serious about their defense and re-introducing the strategic bomber mission to the RAAF could take some of the deterrence strain off of US. I can see the UK possibly kicking tires on the B-21. Way back in the 80's, the F-117 was made available but they refused it. I believe budget, and the political and practical gymnastics to keep such a program hidden was the biggest challenge for them. Curiously the Aussies are the only country to purchase and incorporate an airborne electronic attack aircraft, the EF-18G Growler into their inventory. You know a country is serious when they actually dedicate funds to electronic warfare.
 
Posts: 15195 | Location: Wine Country | Registered: September 20, 2000Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Baroque Bloke
Picture of Pipe Smoker
posted Hide Post
^^^^^^^^
Re: “the F-35 is not yet certified.”
Lordy – it’s been a long time coming.



Serious about crackers
 
Posts: 9699 | Location: San Diego | Registered: July 26, 2014Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Muzzle flash
aficionado
Picture of flashguy
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Hound Dog:
quote:
Originally posted by TMats:
quote:
originally posted by Hound Dog:
Add yet ANOTHER new bomber that came out to 'replace' the BUFF (slang for B-52 - Big Ugly Fat Fellow).

Fellow? Is this the Hallmark Channel?


I won't use that vulgar language in polite society.

I spent 23+ years in the USAF, so I know that a lot of military life revolves around foul language. I just choose to use other words to explain/describe.

Our history is festooned with such 'colorful metaphors' - BUFF, SLUF (Short Littel Ugly Fellow - the A-7 Corsair II), FUBAR (Fouled Up Beyond All Recogntion), JANFO (Joint Army/Navy Foul Up), FIGMO (F- It; Got My Orders, meaning you were leaving the current unit for another assignment). . . I even came up with SNAFUBAR - Situation Normal: All Fouled Up Beyond All Recognition).

I won't apologize for not using bad language.
I'm with you on this. My interpretations are:
FIGMO = Fooey, I Got My Orders
OMGIF = Oh, My Goodness, I'm Fouled (up)
SNAFU = Situation Normal, All Fouled Up
FUBAR = Fouled Up Beyond All Recognition

They've always worked in church . . . .

flashguy




Texan by choice, not accident of birth
 
Posts: 27911 | Location: Dallas, TX | Registered: May 08, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Pipe Smoker:
^^^^^^^^
Re: “the F-35 is not yet certified.”
Lordy – it’s been a long time coming.

I'll let others comment who have better knowledge but, my understanding is that the entire process to certify is unbelievably detailed, to the point of nearly designing a new airplane.
 
Posts: 15195 | Location: Wine Country | Registered: September 20, 2000Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3 4  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    B-21 bomber to be unveiled Dec. 2

© SIGforum 2024