Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply |
An investment in knowledge pays the best interest |
Thanks Para, I changed my start page to search.brave.com | |||
|
Member |
Question for the group: I’ve been using DDG and hadn’t heard of Startpage. In checking their website they say all good things about privacy, but then I ran into this: “Quality search results in true privacy. Startpage delivers Google search results via our proprietary personal data protection technology.” I’m confused. If startpage searches are repackaged google searching, is that an improvement? Don’t want to go back to google deciding what I can and can’t see in a browser search. I must be not understanding something here. Can someone clarify? | |||
|
Tinker Sailor Soldier Pie |
For chrissakes, I installed the startpage search app on my phone, and the first time I tried to use it I was bombarded with ads. So much so it was unusable. I immediately uninstalled it. So much for that. ETA: Brave works fine. I'll switch over to that for now. ~Alan Acta Non Verba NRA Life Member (Patron) God, Family, Guns, Country Men will fight and die to protect women... because women protect everything else. ~Andrew Klavan | |||
|
W07VH5 |
I switched the SIGsearch page from DDG to Brave search. | |||
|
W07VH5 |
Your IP number, location and browser isn’t attached to the search at Google. | |||
|
Lead slingin' Parrot Head |
Start Page is a proxy search engine. Basically, the user types in whatever they are searching for, then SP searches using those search parameters, and then returns the search results to the user. SP is using the users search parameters, but runs the search under their own internet identity. If it helps, think of SP as a buffer between the searcher and the searchee, a go-between, as a layer of insulation. As I mentioned previously, I've been using them for about 10 years and it works, although sometimes it fails to yield as many results as Chrome. The problems I've had with SP is that it is increasingly being blocked by websites and also that users can't run searches while using a VPN. | |||
|
Lead slingin' Parrot Head |
Odd. I've got an Android phone and Start Page app and never once received an ad, although I use cell data and disable as much as possible. Once installed, the Start Page app has a setting to hide promotional material, that can be set either temporarily or permanently. On my laptops there is no SP app, I just pull up the SP website when I need to run a search. | |||
|
Member |
Well duckduckgo is now residing in my MAC trash. And Startpage is taking its place on my desktop. We'll just have to see how it works, but I hope I don't have to go back to Google. Bob | |||
|
Member |
Damn it! Well, my Bookmarks Bar has an extra space now. Year V | |||
|
Team Apathy |
If I understand you correctly then the Startpage user is still subject to Google's algorithm and their decisions on what "boost" or feature in search results... it's just that my personal info isn't tied to the search? In other words, not much better. | |||
|
Lead slingin' Parrot Head |
One thing I'm not clear on is which engine(s) Start Page queries. Assuming for a moment that they do query Google, then yes, to an extent you are correct. You would be subject to whatever algorithm preference that particular provider uses... but keep in mind that part of the algorithm Google uses factors in the location of the user and what the user has searched before, and then tailors the search to what they believe the user wants. By using Start Page, Google (or whatever source(s) SP searches) no longer has the location info or search history to ID the user... they no longer 'recognize' the user and therefore can't tailor the search to the same degree of preference or bias. I believe this is why many websites are starting to block Start Page searches... because they can't collect the user ID info that they previously had access to and used to determine preferences, bias, and to tailor for marketing purposes. I should probably point out that once Start Page has reported its search results and the user clicks on a website, the user is interacting directly with the website and whatever info they collect or cookies they issue to those visiting their site. In other words, Start Page helps to protect the user during the internet search...but once the user clicks on a website they are on their own and will need to rely on the usual good internet security practices and whatever anti-virus software they use. | |||
|
My other Sig is a Steyr. |
I used DuckDuckGo... to get the address for Brave. | |||
|
Member |
I'm not very technically inclined. So I did the same. | |||
|
Team Apathy |
… but! setting aside the algorithms, you are still looking at results filter by Google… so pages they don’t like are buried just as if you went to Google direct. Which, as I recall, is what DDG announced they were doing as well and the catalyst for this thread. In other words, they suck for unfiltered info just as much as Google. *sigh* | |||
|
Member |
Just uninstalled it from all my computer, tablet and phone. | |||
|
Info Guru |
Para - thanks for the heads up on Brave Search. It's apparently still in Beta, but it does work and I have decided to go with it instead of StartPage. I've replaced my old DDG bookmarks with https://search.brave.com/ and changed the default search engine in Brave Browser to Brave Search as well. “Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.” - John Adams | |||
|
Happily Retired |
Yup, to hell with DuckDuckGo. If you are using Brave as your Browser (I am) just go to settings and then search engine and pick the one you want...of course Brave is there. .....never marry a woman who is mean to your waitress. | |||
|
I'll use the Red Key |
DuckDuckGone Brave set to Brave Donald Trump is not a politician, he is a leader, politicians are a dime a dozen, leaders are priceless. | |||
|
probably a good thing I don't have a cut |
So DuckDuckGo filters Russian disinformation. How is that bad? All search engines are supposed to filter unreliable results. That's their whole purpose. And the results aren't eliminated, just down ranked. So it may not be seen on the first page of the results but you can still see it if you go deep enough. So is the problem really the filtering or the virtue signaling? | |||
|
Dances with Wiener Dogs |
Have you been living under a rock?? Media and Big Tech have been slapping the "misinformation" label on anything they don't agree with. Year and a half ago you'd get banned on TwitFace if you suggested the WuFlu escaped from a lab as you were spreading "misinformation". Nowadays it's accepted fact. People are still being banned for spreading "misinformation" if they even suggest any level of irregularity in the last Presidential election. So who decides what is or is not "misinformation"? The Ministry of Truth perhaps? _______________________ “The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws.” Ayn Rand “If we relinquish our rights because of fear, what is it exactly, then, we are fighting for?” Sen. Rand Paul | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 2 3 4 |
Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |