Main Page
The Lounge
SCOTUS US v Hemani - A case that could change the way gun laws apply to the use of controlled substances and if it is unconstitutionalGo ![]() | New ![]() | Find ![]() | Notify ![]() | Tools ![]() | Reply ![]() | |
| Thank you Very little ![]() |
| ||
|
| Member |
Gun owners gonna do drugs, legal or illegal. Always have. | |||
|
| delicately calloused |
Not sure what I think about this. I know intoxication and guns are a bad combination. I also know I don’t want gun owners to be associated with shooting irresponsibly by the anti crowd. Drunk shooters are bad enough….. You’re a lying dog-faced pony soldier | |||
|
| Sigforum K9 handler |
(g)(3) has been largely unenforceable in most of the circuits for years. Personal feelings aside, Congress won’t fix the problem, so perhaps SCOTUS mercy killing it once and for all is a good thing. ________________ People hate you. Train like it. | |||
|
| Powered by Social Strata |
| Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
|
Main Page
The Lounge
SCOTUS US v Hemani - A case that could change the way gun laws apply to the use of controlled substances and if it is unconstitutional
