SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Data Centers are the Devil
Page 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Data Centers are the Devil Login/Join 
Network Janitor
Picture of mkueffer
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by konata88:
Can we clarify? Are these new centers data centers in that they just store data like days of yore? Lots of storage and network but minimal compute?

Or are these supporting the “AI” shit, models, learning, execution that requires significantly more compute? Compute requiring much more power, producing much more heat.


Both, depending on who is building them. The Microsoft DC in Wisconsin is for Azure cloud compute and several expansion buildings for AI.

AI requires lots of compute. GPU mainly and those are power hungry and generate heat. Requires power and cooling.

Businesses do not want their AI in the public cloud. So this changes the DC model for everyone to go from 20Kw racks to 100+Kw rack. Electrical infrastructure in most current buildings are not set for that. Business model says build new and ROI is better than retrofitting.




A few Sigs and some others
 
Posts: 2258 | Location: Waukesha, WI | Registered: February 04, 2012Reply With QuoteReport This Post
The Ice Cream Man
posted Hide Post
I think some of these projects may be “lawyer traps”.

There are lawyers who go around setting up lawsuits for private.

Mostly for ADA stuff off google street view, but I’ve also seen scams where he demanded the right to post some incredibly foul banner on a courthouse, along with the Nativity and Menorah, and then sued when denied.

I heard about one where a small town in a desert didn’t have the right restrictions and a “developer” went in and sued when he was told he could put a huge development in, because they could t afford to provide it with water.

Go to a small rural co-op with cheap electric, then sue when it cannot provide you with electricity?

Haven’t looked into it, but that may be what some of these projects are up to.

Given how much tax money SC is willing to give to MegaCorps, it seems odd that these data centers are going into these old mill towns.
 
Posts: 6840 | Location: Republic of Ice Cream, Low Country, SC. | Registered: May 24, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
No More
Mr. Nice Guy
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Skins2881:


You said KNOW, but then replied with a bunch of speculation:

It the location lakeside?

What is the cooling type? Why do you think it will use water?

Are we worried about drying out the area or oversaturating with water and where do these concerns stem from?

It sounds like your area doesn't even have the capacity for any additional growth, that's not a problem related to data centers, it's a utility issue.

Data centers are a net economic positive period, there is no question regarding that. Typically private roads are paid for by the people that own them. How long is the proposed road?

I would pose the above questions to your local government, if they can't tell them exactly how water they are using; where the power comes from; who's paying for the transmission lines; and if public roadways are going to be built what is the cost sharing on that. For my company I know the answers to these questions we are by FAR a net positive for our community, but you need to make sure your local government gets the right answers to these questions, no different than if a shoe or computer chip factory was going in this location.

I wouldn't even know how to begin to guess impact on bird migration, but for that there's a million organizations that will come out in arms if there's an impact. Thanks for elaborating, reach out directly if you get any answers on the other portions and I can guide you through questions you might realistically ask the board/council to make sure you're answered properly and not sounding like an environmental wack ado or I'll informed person.


There's no question the citizens are going to pay significant dollars one way or another for this project. While I can't give you amounts or what precisely they will go towards, it is a certainty.

The location is not right on the lake shore but quite close. Within the environment of the lake. There are many miles of public road to access that area, and those public roads will need to be improved to carry the construction traffic and then maintained into the future. Since there will likely be huge tax breaks given to the developers, costs will most likely be borne by taxpayers. There will be some magical math showing tax revenues of some sort that offset costs, but those need to be proven and then enforced to be believable.

I don't know where the excess heat will be dumped, but it will either be into the air or into the water. It may also dump water vapor into the air. Realize that this is a very dry area where added heat and/or humidity will significantly impact the environment, all manner of species, and the climate.

Water is a complex issue. I've spoken with a water conservationist about the project and statewide water issues in general. They are saying water will be returned to the lake. Desalinated? Heated? Either would be bad. The pre-existing water shortage issues due to population inflow does not diminish the reasons to be concerned about this data center.

So far the very pro-development state government is saying everything will be great, just trust them.
 
Posts: 11221 | Location: On the mountain off the grid | Registered: February 25, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Honky Lips
Picture of FenderBender
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Aglifter:


(EG, when a solar farm gets hit by a hail storm, and suddenly all the soil is toxic.)



What exactly do you think solar panels are made of?


_____________________________________________
Proverbs 3:31 "Envy thou not the oppressor, and choose none of his ways."
 
Posts: 9326 | Location: Great Basin | Registered: July 24, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by old rugged cross:
Are you getting paid to promote these things on line? Serious question.


Serious answer: That is the dumbest fucking question I have ever seen on this forum.

If you are against AI come up with some serious arguments instead of the bullshit you just posted.
 
Posts: 8190 | Registered: October 31, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
A Grateful American
Picture of sigmonkey
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by FenderBender:...
What exactly do you think solar panels are made of?

99.% of Arsenic, Mercury, Polonium-210 and 1% MSG. Everyone knows that.




"the meaning of life, is to give life meaning" Ani Yehudi אני יהודי Le'olam lo shuv לעולם לא עוד
 
Posts: 46456 | Location: Box 1663 Santa Fe, New Mexico | Registered: December 20, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
The Ice Cream Man
posted Hide Post
https://medium.com/@GSPIAe_eBl...er-acre-862e88c5445f

$15k per acre just to decommission an intact solar farm.

Hail losses hit 50% of construction cost:

https://pv-magazine-usa.com/20...-insurance-costs-72/
 
Posts: 6840 | Location: Republic of Ice Cream, Low Country, SC. | Registered: May 24, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
At the end of the day. The AI genie is out of the bottle. The countries that lead in AI will control the world, the countries that fall behind in AI will be controlled.

Some of you think AI is about "shit models" that are useless or entertaining at best and use a lot of resources or models used to track our movements and spending. That is where it started but it is far beyond that and growing.

AI is now moving into the physical world, think self driving cars and trucks, autonomous drones, humanoid robots. A lot of this will make our lives easier and better, but a lot will be used in the military.

Are there dangers and environmental issues, absolutely.

Again to be very clear, countries that lead in AI will control the world either economically and/or militarily.
 
Posts: 2059 | Location: DFW Texas | Registered: March 13, 2012Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Internet Guru
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by straightshooter01:
At the end of the day. The AI genie is out of the bottle. The countries that lead in AI will control the world, the countries that fall behind in AI will be controlled.

Some of you think AI is about "shit models" that are useless or entertaining at best and use a lot of resources or models used to track our movements and spending. That is where it started but it is far beyond that and growing.

AI is now moving into the physical world, think self driving cars and trucks, autonomous drones, humanoid robots. A lot of this will make our lives easier and better, but a lot will be used in the military.

Are there dangers and environmental issues, absolutely.

Again to be very clear, countries that lead in AI will control the world either economically and/or militarily.


I agree with this analysis. Many people here can remember the productivity paradox of the 80's. AI is a game changer, and I would just recommend that people embrace the technology and try to profit from it.
 
Posts: 2438 | Registered: April 06, 2013Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Honky Lips
Picture of FenderBender
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Aglifter:
https://medium.com/@GSPIAe_eBl...er-acre-862e88c5445f

$15k per acre just to decommission an intact solar farm.

Hail losses hit 50% of construction cost:

https://pv-magazine-usa.com/20...-insurance-costs-72/


That does not approach an answer to my question.


_____________________________________________
Proverbs 3:31 "Envy thou not the oppressor, and choose none of his ways."
 
Posts: 9326 | Location: Great Basin | Registered: July 24, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
אַרְיֵה
Picture of V-Tail
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by sigmonkey:

99.% of Arsenic, Mercury, Polonium-210 and 1% MSG. Everyone knows that.
I did not know about the MSG. That might explain my allergic reaction.



הרחפת שלי מלאה בצלופחים
 
Posts: 33446 | Location: Central Florida, Orlando area | Registered: January 03, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Prefontaine
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Aglifter:
https://medium.com/@GSPIAe_eBl...er-acre-862e88c5445f

$15k per acre just to decommission an intact solar farm.

Hail losses hit 50% of construction cost:

https://pv-magazine-usa.com/20...-insurance-costs-72/


Interesting. I’ve had 35 panels on my house since 2014. The panels are stronger than my roof (shingles). Last big hail storm I had to replace all the shingles except the shingles under my panels. The panels sustained zero damage from the hail storm. I had to replace the half of the roof where there are no panels, the entire fence, and lots of other damage. Those panels (it’s a lease) save me a couple of grand in kWh costs per year.



What am I doing? I'm talking to an empty telephone
 
Posts: 14179 | Location: Down South | Registered: January 16, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
The Ice Cream Man
posted Hide Post
Fender bender, I have no idea what panels are made of.

I know older forms of electronic waste pose major clean up issues, which is why I looked up the clean up cost, and they are significant.

As do O&G production facilities from bankrupt companies

It doesn’t make sense to permanently damage farm land/hazardous farm land for solar panels.

It’s illogical. I get that the companies have found some type of underpriced risk but it doesn’t change the foolishness of it.
 
Posts: 6840 | Location: Republic of Ice Cream, Low Country, SC. | Registered: May 24, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Honky Lips
Picture of FenderBender
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Aglifter:
Fender bender, I have no idea what panels are made of.

I know older forms of electronic waste pose major clean up issues, which is why I looked up the clean up cost, and they are significant.

As do O&G production facilities from bankrupt companies

It doesn’t make sense to permanently damage farm land/hazardous farm land for solar panels.

It’s illogical. I get that the companies have found some type of underpriced risk but it doesn’t change the foolishness of it.


So I can be sure I understand, you don't know what solar panels are made of or how they function but you're sure they'll permanently damage "farm land" in some way? Have I misunderstood you?


_____________________________________________
Proverbs 3:31 "Envy thou not the oppressor, and choose none of his ways."
 
Posts: 9326 | Location: Great Basin | Registered: July 24, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Ammoholic
Picture of Skins2881
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Aglifter:
Fender bender, I have no idea what panels are made of.

I know older forms of electronic waste pose major clean up issues, which is why I looked up the clean up cost, and they are significant.

As do O&G production facilities from bankrupt companies

It doesn’t make sense to permanently damage farm land/hazardous farm land for solar panels.

It’s illogical. I get that the companies have found some type of underpriced risk but it doesn’t change the foolishness of it.


The use of information technology is not going to fail.

If so, they will simply put them in the landfills next to cars, cellphones, computers, TVs, banks, and ice makers when we move past using transportation, communication, technology, money, and ice cream.

Look I seriously don't think the modern luddites will win the technological revolution revolution. If they do win, I imagine something similar to Mad Max so we won't really care, we will just be fighting over water and oil.

Can you explain your question more? It sounds ridiculous to someone who doesn't understand your fear.



Jesse

Sic Semper Tyrannis
 
Posts: 21803 | Location: Loudoun County, Virginia | Registered: December 27, 2014Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post





Safety, Situational Awareness and proficiency.



Neck Ties, Hats and ammo brass, Never ,ever touch'em w/o asking first
 
Posts: 56448 | Location: Henry County , Il | Registered: February 10, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
The Ice Cream Man
posted Hide Post
I looked up the clean up costs for solar panels. It exceeds the cost of ag land.

This would imply that when the panels break/fail/etc they will be abandoned rather than cleaned.

SC is getting a lot of solar farm projects - eliminating farm land and permeable area is illogical, rather than covering parking lots.

Admittedly, I do not think it’s a useful way, yet, of producing electricity in this climate.

I think it is foolish to build subdivisions on farm land, as well.

AI companies will fail because “all” public companies fail in 7 years or so.

A site with a massive power supply and cooling, may be useful in later years - but the South is littered with dead towns and abandoned industrial buildings, and railroad sidings and barge ports which would “always” be useful.
 
Posts: 6840 | Location: Republic of Ice Cream, Low Country, SC. | Registered: May 24, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Ammoholic
Picture of Skins2881
posted Hide Post
Can you please provide a link to information on this because I can not find a single instance of what you described, only extremely contrary information. Also explain how an as of undetermined solar abandonment will lead to us abandoning technology. We are not going to stop having technology, the cellphone in your pocket isn't going anywhere, AI is here to stay, I'd put money on it killing us long before it goes away.

A Google inquiry - where have solar farms been abandoned due to hail damage?

quote:
There are no documented cases of utility-scale solar farms being permanently abandoned solely due to hail damage. While severe convective storms have caused catastrophic, multi-million-dollar damage to facilities, these projects are treated as critical infrastructure assets protected by comprehensive insurance policies. Instead of being abandoned, damaged solar farms undergo extensive repairs, panel replacements, and technology upgrades to resume operations.
Misconceptions about "abandoned" solar farms often stem from dramatic post-storm aerial footage shared on social media, or localized project delays during the reconstruction phase.
## Major Hail Incidents and Their Current Status
Rather than abandoning the sites, operators have actively repaired and reinforced the following heavily publicized solar farms:

* Fighting Jays Solar (Fort Bend County, Texas): In March 2024, a severe hailstorm shattered thousands of panels at this [350 MW facility](https://factcheck.afp.com/doc.afp.com.36P47C3). Despite viral rumors implying the site was ruined or leaking toxins, the project operator immediately initiated cleanup, panel recycling, and [reconstruction protocols](https://www.vde.com/en/vde-americas/newsroom/250114-reevaluating-fighting-jays) to bring the farm back to full capacity. [1, 2]
* Scottsbluff Solar Project (Scottsbluff, Nebraska): A dynamic June 2023 storm with baseball-sized hail destroyed the majority of the panels at this 5.2 MW community solar farm. The project was temporarily knocked offline, but the developer worked alongside insurance providers to replace the damaged modules with high-impact, hail-resistant technology. [3]
* [Midway Solar](https://www.google.com/search?kgmid=/g/11hbghc0ml) (Pecos County, Texas): In 2019, this massive 178 MW facility suffered a direct hit from a severe hailstorm that damaged over 400,000 modules. Totaling over $70 million in damages, it remains one of the costliest solar insurance claims in history. The project was completely repaired, repowered, and successfully returned to commercial service. [4, 5, 6, 7]

## Why Solar Farms Are Repaired Instead of Abandoned

* Lucrative Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs): Solar farms operate under long-term financial contracts to sell electricity to utility companies or corporations. Walking away from a site would trigger catastrophic default penalties.
* Sunk Interconnection Costs: Securing a spot on the electrical grid and building the accompanying substations accounts for a massive portion of a project's budget. It is vastly cheaper for a company to swap out broken panels than to forfeit their valuable grid connection.
* Comprehensive Insurance Coverage: Large-scale renewable projects carry specialized property and business interruption insurance that covers the cost of both physical replacements and lost revenue during downtime. [8]
* Advanced "Hail Stow" Mitigation: Instead of giving up on hail-prone regions, the industry has evolved. Modern trackers utilize automated weather tracking to rotate panels into a steep 50-to-60-degree tilt angle ("hail stow mode") before a storm arrives, allowing stones to deflect off the glass rather than impact it directly. [9]

If you are researching a specific site or claim, let me know the location or name of the solar farm you are asking about, or if you want to explore how insurance premiums and solar panel durability standards are changing to combat severe weather.

[1] [https://www.vde.com](https://www.vde.com/en/vde-americas/newsroom/250114-reevaluating-fighting-jays)
[2] [https://www.facebook.com](https://www.facebook.com/theroyalgazette/posts/solar-farms-hit-by-hailstorms-face-losses-of-up-to-380000-per-megawatt-according/1304872401641403/)
[3] [https://solargis.com](https://solargis.com/resources/blog/solargis-news/hail-forecasting-for-the-us)
[4] [https://www.sciencedirect.com](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148122018468)
[5] [https://www.vde.com](https://www.vde.com/en/vde-americas/hail-risk/understanding-hail-risk)
[6] [https://www.rinnovabili.net](https://www.rinnovabili.net/business/energy/solar-panels-and-climate-extreme-weather-pv/)
[7] [https://www.vde.com](https://www.vde.com/resource/blob/2400724/ff622197f1787b0684625b85b8c3e7f1/pvmi-article-data.pdf)
[8] [https://berkley-risk.com](https://berkley-risk.com/what-insurance-cover-is-essential-for-solar-projects/)
[9] [https://www.instagram.com](https://www.instagram.com/reel/DVwLRDiju7M/)


Think of hermit crabs, another one is always standing by to crawl in the old shell when a crab out grows it's existing shell.



Jesse

Sic Semper Tyrannis
 
Posts: 21803 | Location: Loudoun County, Virginia | Registered: December 27, 2014Reply With QuoteReport This Post
The Unmanned Writer
Picture of LS1 GTO
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by V-Tail:
quote:
Originally posted by sigmonkey:

99.% of Arsenic, Mercury, Polonium-210 and 1% MSG. Everyone knows that.
I did not know about the MSG. That might explain my allergic reaction.


Helps them retain water more efficiently.






Life moves pretty fast. If you don't stop and look around once in a while, you could miss it.



"If dogs don't go to Heaven, I want to go where they go" Will Rogers

The definition of the words we used, carry a meaning of their own...



 
Posts: 14936 | Location: It was CA., Now it's "FREEEEEEDOM!!" (TN) | Registered: March 22, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Lt CHEG
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Skins2881:

…AI is here to stay, I'd put money on it killing us long before it goes away…



I think this perfectly illustrates the concerns that a lot of people have. There are a LOT of people that find the risks of some of the promised AI advancements to far outweigh the potential benefits. There are a lot of people that feel like there’s a line in the sand that should be drawn thereby preventing further advancement of AI beyond that point. Not unlike the widely held desire to prevent nuclear weapon proliferation and the desire to shrink nuclear weapon stockpiles, there’s people that see the AI situation as an opportunity to keep another “nuclear genie” in the bottle. There’s people that could actually justify military action against other countries to prevent AI from becoming a monster in much the same way that they’re willing to bomb the crap out of Iran to prevent them from acquiring a nuclear weapon. I’m not saying that anyone posting in this thread, myself included, has those exact views but I do think it’s wise to consider the potential risks of AI proliferation before it becomes problematic. I’m not saying we are absolutely headed towards sky net (although the marked anti human bias in AI is certainly troubling) but I think the concerns over destruction of arable farmland causing potential food supply issues down the road is a very reasonable and realistic concern.




“It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat.”
 
Posts: 6059 | Location: Upstate NY | Registered: February 28, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    Data Centers are the Devil

© SIGforum 2026