Go ![]() | New ![]() | Find ![]() | Notify ![]() | Tools ![]() | Reply ![]() | ![]() |
Get Off My Lawn![]() |
| |||
|
Baroque Bloke![]() |
Re: “The FACT that six Justices were OK with signing onto an opinion where Justice Barrett took a personal shot at Justice Jackson is a VERY STRONG indication that Jackson has alienated her colleagues and there is a growing lack of respect for her work.” What was the “personal shot”? A hard slam, I hope, but probably more subtle. Serious about crackers. | |||
|
אַרְיֵה![]() |
The article did not name the three justices who dissented. Anyone want to take a guess? Anyone? Bueller? הרחפת שלי מלאה בצלופחים | |||
|
Alienator![]() |
We are extremely fortunate and blessed KBJ is as stupid, annoying, and insufferable to the justices and she is for us. DEI gave her a life appointment but it won't matter if she pissed the others off. SIG556 Classic P220 Carry SAS Gen 2 SAO SP2022 9mm German Triple Serial P938 SAS P365 FDE P322 FDE Psalm 118:24 "This is the day which the Lord hath made; we will rejoice and be glad in it" | |||
|
Get Off My Lawn![]() |
HRK's post on the previous page has one. Then there is this as well ![]() ![]() "I’m not going to read Time Magazine, I’m not going to read Newsweek, I’m not going to read any of these magazines; I mean, because they have too much to lose by printing the truth"- Bob Dylan, 1965 | |||
|
Oriental Redneck![]() |
More on Justice ACB writing: JUSTICE JACKSON skips over that part. Because analyzing the governing statute involves boring "legalese," She essentially called KBJ dumb/lazy. Q | |||
|
Baroque Bloke![]() |
^^^^^ Thanks. That’s a pretty hard slam alright. ![]() I was hoping for a hard, fast one, but guessed it would be more subtle. Serious about crackers. | |||
|
Legalize the Constitution![]() |
Funny how things work out. Because President Trump is so despised by the radical Left, district judges crawled out of the woodwork to block his actions on tariffs, military readiness, immigration, foreign affairs, fraud, abuse and many other issues (to paraphrase AG, Pam Bondi). Their very actions to block him from their little district courts led to the demise of their leftwing agenda. I’m certain that most of us here never understood the interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment granting citizenship to the baby of any mother who could make it to American soil to give birth. Here’s hoping that one day soon the SCOTUS will review that amendment meant to secure citizenship for the children of slaves, and shut the door on the ridiculous interpretation we’ve been living with. _______________________________________________________ despite them | |||
|
Member![]() |
I don't know the inner workings of the SCOTUS, but I have to think the justices all have sizable staffs to boil stuff down and do the heavy lifting for them. I'm sure the legal giants enjoy writing their own opinions and what not. I bet Jackson probably has a staff like Kamala Harris had, who has to do everything for her. And they're probably even more clueless and arrogant, since they don't have to worry about elections. Freewill Firearms 07 FFL, Class 2 SOT | |||
|
Imagination and focus become reality |
They have already done that in United States v. Wong Kim Ark (1898) and decided in favor of the defendants. They will need to overrule that decision. | |||
|
Step by step walk the thousand mile road![]() |
Nice is overrated "It's every freedom-loving individual's duty to lie to the government." Airsoftguy, June 29, 2018 | |||
|
Legalize the Constitution![]() |
I guess I figured that, or we wouldn’t be living under the current interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment. The FDR Supreme Court ruled that Japanese Internment was Constitutional too, so another interpretation of this landmark ruling is in order. _______________________________________________________ despite them | |||
|
Get Off My Lawn![]() |
| |||
|
Staring back from the abyss ![]() |
The autopen Justice. ________________________________________________________ "Great danger lies in the notion that we can reason with evil." Doug Patton. | |||
|
Left-Handed, NOT Left-Winged! |
They did nothing of the kind. The Wong Kim Ark decision ruled that the children of LEGAL RESIDENTS were U.S. Citizens, and today that means the children of Green Card Holders, or possibly people on immigrant visas that will lead to a green card eventually. The court did not state that illegal aliens' children are citizens. Stop repeating leftist nonsense written by hacks intending to mislead the public. | |||
|
Member |
They didn't exactly crawl out of the woodwork. _______________________________________________________________________________________ | |||
|
No More Mr. Nice Guy |
I don't believe that ruling says that a baby of an illegal alien has citizenship. His parents were legally present in this country, though citizens of China. As I understand it, his parents' status was equivalent to having a green card today. | |||
|
Imagination and focus become reality |
The ruling stated nothing about LEGAL residents, it stated "domiciled residents." Read the decision instead of jumping to conclusions. In a 6–2 decision[108][109] issued on March 28, 1898,[110] the Supreme Court held that Wong Kim Ark had acquired U.S. citizenship at birth and that "the American citizenship which Wong Kim Ark acquired by birth within the United States has not been lost or taken away by anything happening since his birth."[111] The opinion of the Court was written by Associate Justice Horace Gray and was joined by Associate Justices David J. Brewer, Henry B. Brown, George Shiras Jr., Edward Douglass White, and Rufus W. Peckham.[112] The Court stated "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" should be interpreted "in the light of the common law" which had included as subjects virtually all native-born children, excluding only those who were born to foreign rulers or diplomats, born on foreign public ships, or born to enemy forces engaged in hostile occupation of the country's territory.[1][113][114][115] The court's majority held that the subject to the jurisdiction phrase in the Citizenship Clause excluded from U.S. citizenship only those persons covered by one of these three exceptions (plus a fourth "single additional exception"—namely, that Indian tribes "not taxed" were not considered subject to U.S. jurisdiction).[4][38] The majority concluded that none of these four exceptions to U.S. jurisdiction applied to Wong; in particular, they observed that "during all the time of their said residence in the United States, as domiciled residents therein, the said mother and father of said Wong Kim Ark were engaged in the prosecution of business, and were never engaged in any diplomatic or official capacity under the Emperor of China". | |||
|
goodheart![]() |
I thought Barrett-Jackson was a car auction. Turns out its the top billing of a UFC cage match on Pay-per-View. _________________________ “Remember, remember the fifth of November!" | |||
|
Peace through superior firepower ![]() |
Verified https://x.com/libsoftiktok/status/1938655436925776014 ____________________________________________________ "I am your retribution." - Donald Trump, speech at CPAC, March 4, 2023 | |||
|
Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 ... 261 262 263 264 265 266 |
![]() | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
|