SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    What Are Democrats Up To In Iowa? - Lack Of Caucus Results
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 11
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
What Are Democrats Up To In Iowa? - Lack Of Caucus Results Login/Join 
Member
Picture of spunk639
posted Hide Post
Biden is so smug and arrogant, sends legal team to tell Iowa Democratic staff they need to r view with him results of caucus to be certain there was no tampering. Joe I'm sure you know all about tampering.

These clowns want to run this country, what an embarrassing group of fools.
 
Posts: 2761 | Location: Boston, Mass | Registered: December 02, 2000Reply With QuoteReport This Post
It's not you,
it's me.
Picture of RAMIUS
posted Hide Post
 
Posts: 7016 | Location: Right outside Philly | Registered: September 08, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of bigdeal
posted Hide Post
Was just thinking the other day after all this impeachment BS what the Dem's could possibly do to look any worse. And then we have tonight caucus.... What a cluster.


-----------------------------
Guns are awesome because they shoot solid lead freedom. Every man should have several guns. And several dogs, because a man with a cat is a woman. Kurt Schlichter
 
Posts: 33845 | Location: Orlando, FL | Registered: April 30, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Muzzle flash
aficionado
Picture of flashguy
posted Hide Post
I was listening to the talking heads on Fox for a few minutes before going to bell choir rehearsal. It seems there are 3 different totals that have to be reported, only one of which is the actual number of votes each candidate received. Apparently they are having problems calculating the other 2 numbers.

flashguy




Texan by choice, not accident of birth
 
Posts: 27902 | Location: Dallas, TX | Registered: May 08, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of sourdough44
posted Hide Post
I woke up to check the results, expecting BERNIE to be out front.

I see a delicious mess for the misfits. They also mention Trump handily won on the republican side.

I want to see some serious meltdown come Nov.
 
Posts: 6114 | Location: WI | Registered: February 29, 2012Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Krazeehorse
posted Hide Post
Relax boys. The MSM will get it right.


_____________________

Be careful what you tolerate. You are teaching people how to treat you.
 
Posts: 5679 | Location: Ohio | Registered: December 27, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Nosce te ipsum
Picture of Woodman
posted Hide Post
Maybe none of the Democrats won. They're all scratching their heads, trying to figure out what to do next.

 
Posts: 8759 | Registered: March 24, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Lawyers, Guns
and Money
Picture of chellim1
posted Hide Post
They won't admit Biden is imploding... so everyone gets a participation trophy!



"Some things are apparent. Where government moves in, community retreats, civil society disintegrates and our ability to control our own destiny atrophies. The result is: families under siege; war in the streets; unapologetic expropriation of property; the precipitous decline of the rule of law; the rapid rise of corruption; the loss of civility and the triumph of deceit. The result is a debased, debauched culture which finds moral depravity entertaining and virtue contemptible."
-- Justice Janice Rogers Brown

"The United States government is the largest criminal enterprise on earth."
-rduckwor
 
Posts: 23896 | Location: St. Louis, MO | Registered: April 03, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Made from a
different mold
Picture of mutedblade
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by ensigmatic:
Jebus, first the Des Moines Register withholds poll results because of a "quality" issue, now the Democrat caucus can't seem to report its results?

These people can't even run a freakin' one-state caucus and they want to run an entire country?!?!

Donkeys? More like deluded, incompetent jackasses.


I was going to bring this up yesterday when I read it, just didn't have time to post it here. It's funny because the Dem's know who they want but the results don't match, so they scrap the whole deal. Very telling if the idiot voting population on that side could see that their masters have no desire to listen to them....


___________________________
No thanks, I've already got a penguin.
 
Posts: 2822 | Location: Lake Anna, VA | Registered: May 07, 2012Reply With QuoteReport This Post
The Whack-Job
Whisperer
Picture of 18DAI
posted Hide Post
Be patient fellas. It takes time to rig a primary. Especially when all you have to work with is democrats. Wink Regards 18DAI


7+1 Rounds of hope and change
 
Posts: 4231 | Registered: August 13, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by flashguy:
{Snip} Apparently they are having problems calculating the other 2 numbers.

flashguy


Further evidence that Democrats can't do math.


----------------------------------------------------
Dances with Crabgrass
 
Posts: 2180 | Location: East Virginia | Registered: October 12, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Shall Not Be Infringed
Picture of nhracecraft
posted Hide Post
Sooo, this must be what a 'Common Core Caucus' looks like.... Wink


____________________________________________________________

If Some is Good, and More is Better.....then Too Much, is Just Enough !!
Trump 2024....Save America!
"May Almighty God bless the United States of America" - parabellum 7/26/20
Live Free or Die!
 
Posts: 8731 | Location: New Hampshire | Registered: October 29, 2011Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Banned
posted Hide Post
The results are apparently NOT what the DNC wanted. So we need time to "fix" this.
 
Posts: 1396 | Registered: August 25, 2018Reply With QuoteReport This Post
wishing we
were congress
posted Hide Post
I read the Iowa caucus rules are very complicated and confusing.

to "fix" issues from 2016, they decided to report both the initial caucus numbers for each candidate and then also the final numbers after they do all their BS sorting and realigning.

One reporter said they may have discovered that the "rules" were so confusing that the rules were not being followed from the beginning count to the end count. Of course confusion like this leaves the door wide open to manipulation.

https://hotair.com/archives/al...wkeye-cauci-upon-us/

CNN just read a statement from the Iowa Democratic Party claiming that there were some “inconsistencies” in the three types of results they were receiving tonight —

first alignment, final alignment, and delegates awarded.

They need those numbers to match, obviously. They claim that there’s no hack of any sort, and they do have paper ballots from each precinct to make sure everything adds up. How long that will take, God only knows.

a precinct secretary who’d been on hold with the Iowa Democratic Party for an hour to report his results decided to call into CNN to complain while he was waiting.

As he was talking to Wolf Blitzer on the air, you could hear the IDP receptionist in the background finally come on the phone on the other line.

The precinct secretary tried saying goodbye to Blitzer so he could finally report his results. But he took too long and the receptionist … hung up.

listen to it:

https://twitter.com/i/status/1224546895479164929
 
Posts: 19485 | Registered: July 21, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
As Stalin said, “It’s not important who votes, but who counts the votes.” Now that would be Russian interferance.
 
Posts: 4472 | Registered: November 30, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
wishing we
were congress
posted Hide Post
CTH view

From the DNC Club’s perspective there were three strategic needs surrounding the Iowa caucuses:

(1) Hide the collapse of Joe Biden;
(2) Diminish the win by Bernie Sanders; and
(3) cover-up a less than enthusiastic voter turnout.

Given the nature of very public primary races, this three-pronged challenge seemed almost impossible.

If everything just seemed to collapse, go wrong, and become a mess; and if the end of the night outcomes could be delayed and undetermined; well, in that scenario the objective would be considered ‘mission accomplished‘ on all three points.

That exact scenario just coincidentally happened.

Despite the media proclaiming Biden was leading the field for the past six months during the impeachment narrative, Joe Biden likely came in fourth or fifth. He may not have gained any delegates in Iowa. No-one will pay attention to that now… and few will question how the “media polling” could have gotten it so wrong. [Tip: they lie]

Simultaneously, Bernie Sanders didn’t stand on stage, declare victory, and receive the praise earned in 2020 that was robbed from him in 2016. No results means no grand victory and momentum. Oh, it’ll probably be declared sometime today that Bernie Sanders won, but, meh, doesn’t deliver the same electoral value. [DNC Club smiling here]


https://theconservativetreehou...didates/#more-182684
 
Posts: 19485 | Registered: July 21, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Ozarkwoods
posted Hide Post
All the people they thought were dead are actually showing up.

Had to laugh that Fox had Donna Brazile on the panel talking about they were doing quality control and making sure it was a fair process.


ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
 
Posts: 4802 | Location: SWMO | Registered: October 20, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Be not wise in
thine own eyes
Picture of kimber1911
posted Hide Post
Here is what the DNC put out just prior to last nights fun.

“ Tonight, our party’s presidential nominating process officially kicks off in Iowa. Today, I’m reflecting on the three years we’ve spent preparing for this moment, the changes we’ve made to make sure we are ready. I’m proud of the historic reforms we passed to increase transparency and accessibility, and that the power is where it belongs: with our voters.

Our party is at its strongest when we empower the grassroots. Last cycle, it was obvious some voters were unhappy with parts of the nominating process. Just like we do every four years, we looked at ways to improve how we choose our presidential nominee. And thanks to the reforms we made, we are excited to have one of the most transparent and inclusive primaries in history. This year’s process has empowered the grassroots and ensured our presidential nominating process reflects the will of the voters who will carry us to victory.”

Tom Peres; How We Prepared For 2020.



“We’re in a situation where we have put together, and you guys did it for our administration…President Obama’s administration before this. We have put together, I think, the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics,”
Pres. Select, Joe Biden

“Let’s go, Brandon” Kelli Stavast, 2 Oct. 2021
 
Posts: 5267 | Location: USA | Registered: December 05, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Woodman:
Maybe none of the Democrats won. They're all scratching their heads, trying to figure out what to do next.

. Ole Joe was probably asleep most of those eight years, except to get his incompetent Hunter a slush fund job.
 
Posts: 4472 | Registered: November 30, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Krazeehorse
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Ozarkwoods:
All the people they thought were dead are actually showing up.

Had to laugh that Fox had Donna Brazile on the panel talking about they were doing quality control and making sure it was a fair process.

And the wrong dead ones did show up.


_____________________

Be careful what you tolerate. You are teaching people how to treat you.
 
Posts: 5679 | Location: Ohio | Registered: December 27, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 11 
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  The Lounge    What Are Democrats Up To In Iowa? - Lack Of Caucus Results

© SIGforum 2024