SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  Mason's Rifle Room    I decided not to scope my Marlin .35 Remington. I went old-school instead.
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
I decided not to scope my Marlin .35 Remington. I went old-school instead. Login/Join 
Truth Wins
Picture of Micropterus
posted
I went with a Williams peep sight. I've used Lyamns in the past and liked them due to their all-steel construction. But since Marlin doesn't drill and tap their receiver sides anymore, I had to go with Williams. I like it a lot.







I'm going to scope my .30-30 and my .45-70. I'm going to put a peep sight like this one on my .44 magnum.


_____________
"I enter a swamp as a sacred place—a sanctum sanctorum. There is the strength—the marrow of Nature." - Henry David Thoreau
 
Posts: 4285 | Location: In The Swamp | Registered: January 03, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Lead slingin'
Parrot Head
Picture of Modern Day Savage
posted Hide Post
Hey, that is a sharp set-up...both the rifle and the Williams sight! Seems like a fairly unobtrusive light weight fast handling set-up that still offers a bit of precision.

Does that tab serve some other purpose or is it mounted to protect the factory rear sight dove tail slot?

Any chance we could get a pic or two of the sight picture that Williams sight produces?
 
Posts: 7324 | Location: the Centennial state | Registered: August 21, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Truth Wins
Picture of Micropterus
posted Hide Post
The blank is solely to fill the empty dovetail slot. It's a Williams brand aluminum blank that slid in with slight thumb pressure and tightened with the hex screw.

I tried to take a pic with the sights lined up but without putting in a rest it was hard to balance everything. But you can get an idea with this shot.

This message has been edited. Last edited by: Micropterus,


_____________
"I enter a swamp as a sacred place—a sanctum sanctorum. There is the strength—the marrow of Nature." - Henry David Thoreau
 
Posts: 4285 | Location: In The Swamp | Registered: January 03, 2010Reply With QuoteReport This Post
A day late, and
a dollar short
Picture of Warhorse
posted Hide Post
Nice clean looking setup.

As long as your eyes stay good, it works well.


____________________________
NRA Life Member, Annual Member GOA, MGO Annual Member
 
Posts: 13727 | Location: Michigan | Registered: July 10, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Lead slingin'
Parrot Head
Picture of Modern Day Savage
posted Hide Post
Thanks for the picture! Looks like the rear sight lets in plenty of light. I was wondering if one of those adjustable diopter irises might be the ticket for a set-up like this but now you've got me thinking along the lines of a Williams sight.

After trying a forum member's Marlin lever action Scout set-up I had planned on going that route, but now I'm wondering if adding a Williams sight along with the Scout scope might be a nice feature to include.
 
Posts: 7324 | Location: the Centennial state | Registered: August 21, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
All my levers have the Williams sights. Cant be beat, IMHO.


End of Earth: 2 Miles
Upper Peninsula: 4 Miles
 
Posts: 16473 | Location: Marquette MI | Registered: July 08, 2014Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Prepared for the Worst, Providing the Best
Picture of 92fstech
posted Hide Post
I recently took the fixed 4x Nikon off my 1895 Guide Gun in.45-70 and replaced it with a Williams WGRS aperture sight. It's a little smaller and simpler than the OP's sight, but offers less adjustment.

I found that I am almost as accurate with it as I was with the scope, it allows for faster target acquisition, and removing the scope provided a huge improvement in the weight and handling of the rifle. Can't go wrong with a Willams peep!
 
Posts: 9459 | Location: In the Cornfields | Registered: May 25, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Lead slingin'
Parrot Head
Picture of Modern Day Savage
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 92fstech:
I recently took the fixed 4x Nikon off my 1895 Guide Gun in.45-70 and replaced it with a Williams WGRS aperture sight. It's a little smaller and simpler than the OP's sight, but offers less adjustment.

I found that I am almost as accurate with it as I was with the scope, it allows for faster target acquisition, and removing the scope provided a huge improvement in the weight and handling of the rifle. Can't go wrong with a Willams peep!


Interesting input! Do you have any experience using a Williams or aperture sight in low light conditions? If so, how does it compare to a decent scope in similar low light conditions?
 
Posts: 7324 | Location: the Centennial state | Registered: August 21, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Prepared for the Worst, Providing the Best
Picture of 92fstech
posted Hide Post
I have not had chance to use it in low light yet...mine does have a fiber optic front sight, so I imagine that should help. I didn't go looking for the F/O front sight, but it came with the WGRS as a set, and the factory front sight was too low for the rear peep, so I figured I might as well try it.

Williams does make different size apertures..you might try going to a larger one if you have trouble with using the peep in low light.

This message has been edited. Last edited by: 92fstech,
 
Posts: 9459 | Location: In the Cornfields | Registered: May 25, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of pulicords
posted Hide Post
Nice set up! I went with the Williams peep for my "Big Bore 94" Winchester in .375 Winchester. I loved using it for hunting wild pigs in CA, when we could use copper jacketed/lead core ammo. Unfortunately, the econazis banned lead ammunition for hunting and I couldn't find any "PC" replacement that would shoot comparably. Frown


"I'm not fluent in the language of violence, but I know enough to get around in places where it's spoken."
 
Posts: 10279 | Location: The Free State of Arizona | Registered: June 13, 2007Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Lead slingin'
Parrot Head
Picture of Modern Day Savage
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 92fstech:
I have not had chance to use it in low light yet...mine does have a fiber optic front sight, so I imagine that should help. I didn't go looking for the F/O front sight, but it came with the WGRS as a set, and the factory front sight was too low for the rear peep, so I figured I might as well try it.

Williams does make different size apertures..you might try going to a larger one if you have trouble with using the peep in low light.


Finally had a moment to visit the Williams website and research a few of their sights.

I was just about to ask about how the Marlin factory front sight matches up with the Williams rear aperture sight so thanks for that additional info.

I'm just in the planning stages for the rifle reconfiguration at this point, but I'm curious if it makes sense to buy multiple, or at least a couple, apertures for different conditions, such as their Twilight apertures. Those of you who have experience with the Williams sights, can you simply replace the aperture for the given conditions, or does replacing the aperture require additional sight in shooting range time each time it is replaced?

Also what, if any, benefit is there to the long shank apertures?
 
Posts: 7324 | Location: the Centennial state | Registered: August 21, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
For me, no change of impact with different apertures. I even have left the apertures off completely for a makeshift ghost ring.
The only benefit I can see to the long shank aperture is moving your eye closer to the rear sight.


End of Earth: 2 Miles
Upper Peninsula: 4 Miles
 
Posts: 16473 | Location: Marquette MI | Registered: July 08, 2014Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Lead slingin'
Parrot Head
Picture of Modern Day Savage
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by YooperSigs:
For me, no change of impact with different apertures. I even have left the apertures off completely for a makeshift ghost ring.
The only benefit I can see to the long shank aperture is moving your eye closer to the rear sight.


Good to know, thanks for your input!
 
Posts: 7324 | Location: the Centennial state | Registered: August 21, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Prepared for the Worst, Providing the Best
Picture of 92fstech
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by YooperSigs:
For me, no change of impact with different apertures. I even have left the apertures off completely for a makeshift ghost ring.
The only benefit I can see to the long shank aperture is moving your eye closer to the rear sight.


I had similar results. The sight came with a medium-sized aperture, which worked well, but seemed a little large. I thought I might be able to be even more precise with a smaller one, so I ordered the smallest size they offered. I found that it didn't really improve my groups at all, and made the front sight a little bit harder to acquire. I put the original aperture back on, and am happy with it. I think the lesson here is that my abilities are the limiting factor rather than the size of the sight...
 
Posts: 9459 | Location: In the Cornfields | Registered: May 25, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
I'm not laughing
WITH you
Picture of Rolan_Kraps
posted Hide Post
I love receiver peep sites! Good on you!




Rolan Kraps
SASS Regulator
Gainesville, Georgia.
NRA Range Safety Officer
NRA Certified Instructor - Pistol / Personal Protection Inside the Home
 
Posts: 23581 | Location: Gainesville, GA | Registered: October 11, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  Mason's Rifle Room    I decided not to scope my Marlin .35 Remington. I went old-school instead.

© SIGforum 2024