I would be interested if they ditched the barrel mounted front sight and made the handguard long enough to be useful.
I regret not snagging a few more of the Mega monolithic uppers back when they were in stock at JSE. Those were done right.
|I swear I had |
something for this
The patent runs out in 2026. I get the feeling we'll be flooded in monorails the minute LMT's patent runs out.
As a far-out gripping point? As far as usefulness in mounting acceasories goes, there is probably plenty of space, for most folks. My two most often used ARs have drop-in guards behind a fixed or folding front sight gas block, on a carbine gas system. I have a light, IR laser, pressure switches for both of those, and a small nav light mounted. Gauging usefulness is contextual and subjective, like everything else. I like an exposed front sight gas block more often than I don't; I likely represent the minority.
All that being said, I do agree that this gun suffers from either not enough handguard, or too much barrel, depending on what your application is.
On the 6940, you gain rail space at the 3, 9, and 12 positions, where the delta ring would normally be. Unfortunately, they opted for QD pockets at the front 3 and 9, which is where rail slots are more valuable.This message has been edited. Last edited by: KSGM,
Do people really still want quad rails? I can see the monolithic upper appeal, sorta, but I will never buy another quad rail again. So, not the best rifle ever for me.
I prefer quad rails, just as long as they're not gargantuan. An issued KAC rail is fine to me, the SF rails I prefer are awesome, and even a free-float on a standard barrel nut from MI is decent. Some of the older YHM stuff was huge; that stuff is a no-go for me. LMT mono rails are very trim, as are the DD RIS. I have pretty long fingers, when compared to a lot of folks, so that may affect my assessment of this stuff.
Really? You prefer all that rail to a slim Mlok or even Keymod? If you don’t mind me asking, why?
80% of the rail isn’t used, it’s heavier, it needs rail covers or it’s a cheese grater, I don’t see the attraction anymore.
I am aware that my preference makes little sense. I don't have any logical justification for it. I suppose I am used to the feeling of a quad; a slim handguard feels dainty to me. If I liked a gun for all sorts of reasons, and it was only available with M-Lok, I wouldn't be turned-off by that; until that gun comes along, I'll take a quad.
|They're after my Lucky Charms!|
I see KSGM's point. I have KeyMod on my Mk18 clone. And it is a slim build even with the BCM covers. I have KAC rails on my M4 upper and on my M16A4 clone. I do like them on the full sized rifle (and on the FN M16A4 I was issued when in uniform). But on my issued M4 and personal M4gery, I wish they were a little slimmer.
Lord, your ocean is so very large and my divos are so very f****d-up
Dirt Sailors Unite!
Oh I wasn't throwing stones. The heart wants what the heart wants. lol My choices aren't always the easiest to defend. I was just curious if I was missing something.
I have a friend who works for CZ. What you say is true. CZ does not "make" Colts. They own the company. Today's Colts have not declined due to being owned my CZ.
Proud to be in Texas!
|Raised Hands Surround Us|
Three Nails To Protect Us
Colt’s decline happened prior to CZ acquiring them.
I think that when those dark voices start calling our name in the back of our head we need to remind those voices who we belong to!
Andrew Schwab - Project 86
No, for resting on structure when shooting other than offhand. Long handguards grant a lot of leeway on where you can rest your rifle without setting the barrel on something.
Doesn't matter much if you largely shoot offhand. I frequently shoot from improvised positions off of whatever is available. Long handguards are nice for that.
That would be fantastic. I will be buying.
|Powered by Social Strata||Page 1 2 3|