Go ![]() | New ![]() | Find ![]() | Notify ![]() | Tools ![]() | Reply ![]() | |
Member![]() |
The OP said:
...so energy delivered to the target should definitely be considered. | |||
|
| With bad intent |
Im a swede guy through and through. ________________________________ | |||
|
| Member |
The 6.5 variants have been killing stuff for well over 100 years. | |||
|
| semi-reformed sailor |
OP, I'd recommend a 700 in 243 or 308 Either caliber are easily purchased everywhere Either caliber will go the distance Either caliber will kill deer sized animals The 243 is a little faster but the trade off is they are hotter than the 308 and will wear out a barrel in a lot shorter time....if you are not gonna shoot over 100 rounds a year, than it won't matter about the faster barrel wear... The 243 has less recoil than the 308 “You may beat me, but you will never win.” sigmonkey-2020 “ in my opinion, anything that we can do to trigger a potential aneurysm in a leftist is a good thing and worth doing” nhtagmember 2025 | |||
|
| Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 2 3 4 |
| Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
|

