Old Air Cavalryman
| While they start off somewhat tight initially, ( lube the bolt, BCG, charging handle, buffer and buffer spring well ) they're utterly solid and accurate rifles. Nice thing is, they're not simply AR10 copies. Many design improvements were incorporated into the DD5s to make them much more reliable and run better than the numerous AR10 copies out on the market. They use SR25 pattern magazines so Magpul mags, ( which come with each rifle ) work well with these rifles. Daniel Defense just recently introduced the DD5 in their Tornado Grey and Mil-Spec + colors, along with the V2 version that has an 18" barrel. https://danieldefense.com
"Also I heard the voice of the Lord saying who shall I send, and who will go for us? Then said I, here am I, send me."
|
| Posts: 7464 | Location: Georgia | Registered: February 19, 2005 |
IP
|
|
Member
| They are both great rifles, but other than price what's important to you? Example: cheap mags (get the DD), folds (get the SCAR), barrel options (get the scar), etc.
“So in war, the way is to avoid what is strong, and strike at what is weak.”
|
| |
Member
| quote: Originally posted by hrcjon: They are both great rifles, but other than price what's important to you? Example: cheap mags (get the DD), folds (get the SCAR), barrel options (get the scar), etc.
For me, I just wanted a SCAR to have one. Folding stock is cool but I'd never use it. Quick change barrels are cool, but unless SBR's are removed from NFA, I don't see myself ever buying another barrel. I've only ever shot a DD 5.56 rifle, sold it from the shop I used to work at to a buddy from work, and I was really impressed by it. I can only imagine that the 308 version is just a larger more expensive version of what I liked. I do appreciate the cheaper magazines. I'd like to mount a 1-4x optic in it and use it for 300-500m shooting, my only concern is reliability and accuracy for the amount of cash I'm dropping. |
| Posts: 403 | Location: PA | Registered: February 21, 2006 |
IP
|
|
Member
| If none of the SCAR pluses mean anything you will be totally happy with the DD. Its completely reliable. Acceptable accuracy is always a personal/ammo thing but its no different than the SCAR.
“So in war, the way is to avoid what is strong, and strike at what is weak.”
|
| |
Member
| I already have an MWS but if I was getting a new battle rifle sort of thing Id probably go with a DD.
I Love my old DD m4v3. |
| |
Member
| Ive had my DD5V1 for a year and a half and it has been fatastic. From quality ammo to steel cased ammo, it has been a reiable rifle.
Sig P220 Elite Dark, W. German 220/226 Navy/226 Tac Ops/226R Stainless/228/229 Legion/229R/M11-A1D Glocks, HK, Walther, XDs, etc, etc...
|
| |
Sigforum K9 handler
| quote: my only concern is reliability and accuracy for the amount of cash I'm dropping
If those are your concerns, buy it. You'll not be disappointed. |
| |
Old Air Cavalryman
| Congrats! Clean it, lube it, shoot it and repeat. Enjoy!
"Also I heard the voice of the Lord saying who shall I send, and who will go for us? Then said I, here am I, send me."
|
| Posts: 7464 | Location: Georgia | Registered: February 19, 2005 |
IP
|
|
Member
| If you're near Philadelphia checkout atlantic tactical I saw a SCAR 17 there at LEO pricing. |
| |
Member
| quote: Originally posted by calugo: If you're near Philadelphia checkout atlantic tactical I saw a SCAR 17 there at LEO pricing.
I am and I did. Unfortunately, they told me that they did not have one currently, that they had 100 ordered and 82 reserved, and that I was welcome to become number 83. And they had them on order for the past year. If they had one on the shelf and lied to me over the phone, that would not be the first time they'd lied to me about in stock and available items. I use them as a last resort, both professionally and personally. I'd rather use LAPG for gear and source my firearms from local dealers that offer LE pricing. |
| Posts: 403 | Location: PA | Registered: February 21, 2006 |
IP
|
|