quote:

Originally posted by flesheatingvirus:
I have an Atlas and really like it. Accu-Tac look like they are tough enough to be used as a backup bludgeon, but they seem unnecessarily bulky and heavy.

quote:

Originally posted by smschulz:

You need to actually handle one to appreciate it. Accu-Tac is neither heavier nor bulkier. However, if it were heavier or wouldn't hurt anything, especially for PRS.

quote:

Originally posted by sigfreund:
The number and types of bipods have exploded in recent years, and I’m familiar with only three types so asking and checking reviews is a good idea these days.

If your Harris is slipping, I can only assume it’s one of the models without locking notches. I discovered early on after they were introduced that the notched leg models were better. After I learned about Atlas bipods, I decided to try one despite its price, and I stopped using my Harris bipods. It’s long been reported/claimed that Atlas is less susceptible to “bipod hop” than Harris models. I can’t attest to that, but the two Atlases I ended up with don’t seem to cause any weirdness in points of impact or groups.

I tried the various factory optional feet that are available for the Atlas to replace the standard rubber feet, and the only ones I still use are the spikes that are significantly longer than other spike types I’m familiar with, and then I use them only in snow. As something to be aware of, the Atlas type feet are commonly used in certain other brands, such as the MDT Ckye Pod. That means there are aftermarket feet that work in the Atlas bipods. I have Hawk Hill Custom spike feet in one of my Atlas bipods, and have the rubbery covers that can be placed over the spikes if desired.

There are advantages and disadvantages to spikes. I generally use them because I don’t like the bipod to slide around. On the other hand, some people want their bipods to slide freely. Metal spikes can of course damage some surfaces.

A few years ago I became aware of the MDT Ckye Pod bipod, and it’s what I use most often now. The single pull model that I have can be extended to raise significantly higher than the Atlas’ legs, and they even make (very expensive!) double- and triple-pull models. I also like that the MDT’s legs can be spread out to three different positions to help fine tune the height. Both the MDT and Atlas bipods’ legs can be folded forward at 45 degrees, and the Atlas’ legs can even be folded back at 45° degrees or even folded back completely for carry if desired.

The MDT Ckye Pod bipod’s legs can be extended by just pulling on the leg which can be an advantage; the Atlas requires pulling down the lock while extending the legs. I normally use Hawk Hill spike feet with my MDT bipod, but I have the covers for them if needed.

There are different types of heads for the Atlas; mine have lever type quick detach heads for use with Picatinny rail sections. The Ckye Pod originally came with a head for use with the Arca Swiss rail system, but later they designed a head that works with both the Arca and Picatinny systems.

If I could have only one of the bipods I own, I’d choose the MDT Ckye Pod because of its versatility, but I wouldn’t be too sad if I were limited to an Atlas.