Member

| What’s your purpose for a Garand? Shooter or collector? Shooter=H&R. Collector=Winchester.
--------------------------- My hovercraft is full of eels.
|
| | |
Prepared for the Worst, Providing the Best

| My first reaction says go with the Winchester, just for the collectability aspect of it being a Winchester and an early S/N. However, I have 2 M14s at work...one H&R and the other a Winchester. The H&R is rougher looking, but clearly the better shooter. I also have a couple of Springfield Garands, and one of them has a Winchester bolt. It works fine, but the machining on that Winchester part is clearly rougher than any of the SA or IHC parts on either gun. Honestly, I think I'd have to look each of them over, examine the individual parts for fit, finish, and wear, and then decide accordingly. Either way, getting to pick from 3 Garands sounds like a good problem to have. Be sure to let us know what you decide, and post some pics!
-----------------------------------------------------------
Any comments made by this poster are my own and do not reflect the views or opinions of my employer.
|
| | | Posts: 11816 | Location: In the Cornfields | Registered: May 25, 2006 |  
IP
|
|
Fighting the good fight

| quote: Originally posted by pbslinger: So you’d choose the one that shoots the best regardless of make or serial number?
Depends on what you're wanting from the Garand. If you're strictly after a shooter, yes. Get whatever shoots best or has the best muzzle/throat readings and nicest bore. If you're after something with greater historical value, and greater monetary value to a collector, then no. Get the Winchester. |
| | | Posts: 35208 | Location: Northwest Arkansas | Registered: January 06, 2008 |  
IP
|
|
Member
| For a "collectable", I would pick the rife that was most original/correct or easiest to return to correct. No refinished receivers in other words. WRA restorations, especially early ones are an expensive proposition unless you already have the hard to find/expensive parts.
For a shooter, the one with the best throat and muzzle measurements and tightest fitting stock.
I presume that could be the H&R as it is the newest of the bunch, but if any of these are later arsenal rebuilds all bets are off there.
Got pics? |
| | |
"Member"

| Short of IHC, Winchester's bring the most money. But are in actuality, the "worst" ones. (worst is a bad choice of words of course, but machining and finish, Winchesters are usually the poorest) Machining and finish wise, my H&R is better than all the Springfield's I've owned. I'd choose the Winchester because I don't own one.  (Not related to the OP's question, has the price of IHC's come down some? Didn't some come back into the country in recent years?) |
| | |
Member
| quote: Originally posted by cas: (Not related to the OP's question, has the price of IHC's come down some? Didn't some come back into the country in recent years?)
Maybe a little, depending on who is selling. Yes, MAP rifles from Turkey IIRC. |
| | |
Glorious SPAM!

| quote: Originally posted by 1KPerDay: What’s your purpose for a Garand? Shooter or collector? Shooter=H&R. Collector=Winchester.
I agree. I have two CMP Garands, both service grade. A 1954 Springfield and a 1954 H&R. For quality the edge goes to the H&R. Both shoot well but H&R was known for quality. Now if you want history go Winchester. Only built during WWII. |
| | |