“Tuxedo gun” implies that some level of elegance is required. While a PPK is the classic choice, I’ll nominate the Seecamp LWS-32.
My several PPK and PPK/s pistols were not very reliably performers, tending to fail to feed, so, were disappointing.
To be fair, some early Seecamps tended to break, including both of my mid-Eighies LWS-25 pistols, but were improved, at least in the LWS-32 line, in that regard, by a certain serial number range, and, importantly, Seecamps tend to feed reliably. (Sorry, I no longer recall which serial numbers indicate the improved pistols.)
Have Colts, will travel
Posts: 3193 | Location: SE Texas | Registered: April 08, 2008
How about a current Beretta Tomcat Covert .32 ACP with a threaded barrel?
Don't those things regularly break? That trait's not particularly elegant.
I think the rather larger Beretta .380s like the one 92fstech proposed back on page 1 of the thread would be way more dashing and debonair, even if it does carry a bit more girth. Although at that size I'd nominate a Wilson EDC X9 3.25" and then get Bill Wilson to delete the equipment rail.
-MG
Posts: 2289 | Location: The commie, rainy side of WA | Registered: April 19, 2020
“Tuxedo gun” implies that some level of elegance is required.
I would agree.
While many have said the Walther PPK/S and on paper it looks like a great choice, I've never had luck with them and the one I've owned was an absolute turd. I did have a Walther PP in 7.65mm many years ago which ran great, but my PPK/S in 9mm kurz (.380) couldn't get through a full magazine without multiple failures.
The only gun's in my inventory that I would consider a "Tuxedo Gun" is my Sig P210 Carry
Sometimes, you gotta roll the hard six
Posts: 4628 | Location: SouthCentral PA | Registered: December 05, 1999
Originally posted by Ripley: Colt Gov't .380 -- I had to trade this flawed gun and hated losing it.
I had that gun's little brother, the original Colt Mustang.
I remember it as reliable, pleasant to shoot but not very accurate.
It's another gun I should have never traded away.
I was pretty new to pistol shooting at the time. I remember being shocked at how much more accurate the Sig P230 was but also by how much more recoil the P230 generated.
Posts: 462 | Location: Illinois | Registered: June 13, 2020
Originally posted by jaysouth: Remember that tux trousers do not have pockets or belt loops. Your option is to sew a holster into a reinforced cummberbund.
I say old boy, I rather fancy a properly integrated concealed under-the-sleeve holster pocket. Fitted right in underneath that flexible woven body armor in the lining of the coat. Besides, proper undercover tuxedo etiquette requires one to never separate one's self from their jacket during any social affair, no matter how hot and bothered the circumstances may be. After all, one never knows when SPECTRE may decide to crash the soiree and an impertinent and wholly inconvenient gun battle erupts (especially an annoyance when one is busily hitting on that lovely countess at the same time).
All important things to consider, old chap...
-MG
Posts: 2289 | Location: The commie, rainy side of WA | Registered: April 19, 2020
Call me crazy, but I feel like a nice old Smith & Wesson Bodyguard should be part of this discussion. Any Model 38, 49, 638 or 649 in .38 Special would make a fantastic tuxedo gun.
Originally posted by jaysouth: Remember that tux trousers do not have pockets or belt loops. Your option is to sew a holster into a reinforced cummberbund.