Page 1 2
Go | New | Find | Notify | Tools | Reply | |
| Member |
I was reading the Sig web site last night and found that Sig sets its sights up to "cover the bull". I have always shot a pistol by having the top of front sight even with the top of back sight and the bull sitting on top of the front sight. or "pumpkin on the post" Which do you use, 'cover the bull' or 'pumpkin on the post" LOL I feel silly saying that but it is accurate. Carl | ||
|
| Member |
this is from sig, FAQ's My SIG SAUER pistol is not accurate. Why? What should I do? All SIG SAUER production duty/combat pistols are set up to use a “combat” sight picture. This is where the front sight completely covers the bullseye of the target. Using a six o’clock (“pumpkin on a post”) or center mass (“half’n’half”) sight picture will result in low impact. SIG SAUER, Inc sights in all non-sporting and non-target pistols for 2.5 inch groupings @ 15 yards. If you are still having trouble please contact Customer Service for further help and instruction. Please have your serial number ready. There are also very helpful free Internet sites that cover pistol group analysis. | |||
|
Member |
HK and many other manufacturers use the same "combat" sight picture since they're primarily defensive pistols shot at defensive ranges. It's common knowledge of anyone who has owned SIG pistols for awhile. Some accept it, others change the front sight to provide them with a "6 o'clock" picture. Those are more "bulls eye" shooters. The sights are not set in stone and most learn to shoot their SIG pistols in that manner and do fine. Set up your pistol to whatever combination of sights that you shoot well with using the sight picture you prefer. If people would mind their own damn business this country would be better off. I owe no one an explanation or an apology for my personal opinion. | |||
|
Sigforum K9 handler |
"Combat Sight Picture" was a whizbang answer that customer service came up with to "combat" the rising tide of complaints they received when SIG stopped actually shooting the guns for zero when they leave the factory. Few, if any will zero worth a damn at any kind of distance because they throw the flavor of the day sights on them before they leave the door. The SIG Sauer Academy does not teach "combat sight picture" despite what customer service may tell you their guns are designed for. | |||
|
| That's just the Flomax talking  |
You can achieve any sight picture you want by changing the front or rear sight as needed. Almost all of my SIGs have a #9 rear sight so I can aim sub-center. | |||
|
| Member |
What do they teach for sight picture? p229Extreme/P226Tac-Ops/P226 Extreme/P226 SAO) P226 X-5 Blue Moon/P226 X-5 Black and White | |||
|
Domari Nolo |
IMO, this is the only sight picture that makes sense, and all pistols should be zeroed as such. I just don't see any other logical option.  | |||
|
Now Serving 7.62 |
Amen. I can't stand that new pistols are sent out with sights meant to obscured the target. The above sight picture is the only one I use. If I recall, the 6-8 combination is the one that provides the above sight picture, correct? | |||
|
Member |
This is what I love about SIGforum. Very few fanboys here. I love my SIG's, but I'm old enough to be told the truth. Thanks to all of you who willing to set the record straight. Risk the consequences of honesty... | |||
|
| A teetotaling beer aficionado  |
An Exeter built P226 I had shot to the "cover the target" hold, and another one (W. German) shot properly as pictured above except with 3 dot sights. My P228 also shoots aligned as above with Mepro NS. Men fight for liberty and win it with hard knocks. Their children, brought up easy, let it slip away again, poor fools. And their grandchildren are once more slaves. -D.H. Lawrence | |||
|
| Member |
Is a Sig sight #6 taller or shorter than a #8? Carl | |||
|
| Member |
SIG rule, numbers up groups up. So as a physical matter taller. “So in war, the way is to avoid what is strong, and strike at what is weak.” | |||
|
| Member |
So now we have three of these threads going... Two in the "Armorers" forum and this one. | |||
|
| Sigforum K9 handler |
Tip of the front sight is where the bullet goes was the last thing I saw in their manuals. I had a picture of the page on my old photo bucket, but no longer have access. | |||
|
Lost |
I've exchanged a few emails with Adam Painchaud of Sig Sauer Academy. They teach "Put the dot where you want the bullet to go". In other words, use the front dot just like the electronic red dot on a rifle. They indeed do not seem to use the term "combat sighting" very much, if at all, but the official use of this term is not technically inconsistent with their definition of it, i.e. using the dot as the aiming reference. This message has been edited. Last edited by: kkina, | |||
|
"Member" |
What if you need to shoot smaller/farther away targets? (the usual answer is "I don't") _____________________________________________________ Sliced bread, the greatest thing since the 1911. | |||
|
| Domari Nolo |
The need to shoot smaller/farther away targets is exactly why you want to use this sight picture. | |||
|
Ammoholic |
I find that picture easier to shoot farther/smaller. Combat sight pic covers the entire target when I do matches with 3-4" steel, especially this one I do where they set the little buggers 20 yards out. Jesse Sic Semper Tyrannis | |||
|
| addicted to trailing-throttle oversteer |
Yup, that's the sight picture I prefer, straight-8s, 3-dot or single-dot. All of my Glocks are set up this way, few of my stainless slide SIGs and HKs are, at least straight out of the box. | |||
|
| Every day is New Year's Day for Calendar Boy! Oh, and I'm BANNED |
As stated, number up impact up. But if you must know. A rear 8 is taller then a rear 6, but a front 8 is shorter than a front 6. | |||
|
| Powered by Social Strata | Page 1 2 |
 | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
|
© SIGforum 2024