Originally posted by cmparrish: I'll take one only if it comes with General Purpose, Armor-Piercing, Rubber Ricochet, Incendiary, Grenade and High Explosive rounds.
I think we're a couple years away from a Lawgiver.
Posts: 2154 | Location: TX | Registered: October 28, 2010
Originally posted by .38supersig: I could see this being a corporate mandated option for anyone working security detail within an institution or any high risk line of work.
Like the guns at the UN space freak prison in The Expanse.
quote:
Originally posted by Will938: If you don't become a screen writer for comedy movies, then you're an asshole.
Posts: 17193 | Location: Washington State | Registered: April 04, 2003
Well this has been in the Bond movies, License to Kill has the point 220 camera gun with the palm reader...
quote:
"This is a Signature Rifle, and that is an optical palm reader. I plug this into the bottom, like that, once I've programmed it... There, nobody can use the gun, but you."
Of course you need Dentonite explosive tooth paste to go with it!
Posts: 25357 | Location: Gunshine State | Registered: November 07, 2008
Next year I bet they will claim to have "AI technology."
Also...
What the Hell is this crap.
quote:
The gun is striker-fired, but the trigger does not connect to the firing mechanism. It is fire-by-wire using a solid-state electronic fire control system.
So someone with a nearby ham radio transmitter could cause a logic error in the $2 Chinese made chip they use, and boom, instant negligent discharge.
I think most of our seasoned electrical engineers here are without words, especially those who have designed hi-rel, life support, or automotive devices, in which I believe this would be close in terms of design reliability needs. Especially design constraints to prevent an NG in a fly by wire system.
I suppose it's possible the reporter mis-worded this, but if this is true fly by wire, then get the hell out of here with that piece of shit.
Not only do I not want one, I don't want one in the same county as me.
I expect some lawsuits to follow as the result of some tragic failure. Either failure to fire or an NG.
Posts: 11388 | Location: 45 miles from the Pacific Ocean | Registered: February 28, 2003
Originally posted by sonnydaze: If you have kids, might be ok. Otherwise, gimmicks are dangerous... Simplicity and careful planning get my vote.
^^^ Fair enough but we have or had a better mechanical solution. A former employee had a Steyr pistol. It actually had a micro integrated lockout mechanism. He just had the key on his keychain in his pocket. Fast and effective and not subject to problems like dirty fingers, wet hands, new glasses etc. that seem to plague biometrics and facial scanners.
I can see departments like NYPD, Portland, San Francisco, etc. adopting this though.
Originally posted by patw: Anytime you rely on electronics/batteries for a gun to function,(not talking about rds or the like), you are asking for trouble.
I see way too many failures of ALL things electronic, especially if powered by batteries. For something my life or the lives of family members may depend on? Not a chance!
____________________________ Bill R. North Alabama
_____________________________ I just can't quit grinnin' from all of this winnin'!
Posts: 4952 | Location: Madison, AL | Registered: December 06, 2009
