SIGforum
new to me factory Ni 226 from 1991
September 19, 2019, 03:41 PM
.38supersigNice!
I found a P226 for crazy cheap and know the feeling well.
This one looks like a keeper.
September 20, 2019, 06:25 AM
bionic218Nice score!
September 20, 2019, 06:50 AM
Bill-in-TexasThat looks like a real find!
Congratulations!
-Bill
Former US Army, Sgt., 82nd Abn. Div. Paratrooper,
Infantryman, (81mm Mortars) Certified Armorer
Love God, Country, & Family
September 20, 2019, 06:52 AM
Mustang-PaPaHow are you verifying that its a factory finish without the correct box and label?
September 20, 2019, 10:13 AM
Excam_ManVery nice.
Looks to be correct. And by the serial number, it should be.
I have its younger sibling (six off from yours) and was verified by Sig to be an original nickel finish.
September 20, 2019, 11:56 AM
bolo4tomthanks everyone. I will shoot this one since its been fired and I don't have the extras. my 228 Ni is unfired and will stay that way.
Mustang, like Excam, Sig verified it as factory Ni finish.
September 20, 2019, 01:43 PM
12131That's nice. I didn't realize SIG now can verify stuff that pre-date 2005? Did they do that for you in writing?
Btw, what's going on with the mag base? Looks strange, not original to the P226 mag of that era?
Q
September 20, 2019, 01:51 PM
MacGyverIt looks like someone put a P228/P229 floor plate on it.
September 20, 2019, 03:21 PM
bolo4tom12131..Sig is fickle..ive called bout pistols made in 07-08 and they cant give me much info, then I call on a lark just to ask and they verify...no additional info, just that it was indeed factory Ni...I don't know how they keep anything straight, but in short, it was 'verified' by phone. I take more stock in Fxcam's comment since his is only 6 digits off and its only 60 or 70? off from one on the pinned master list
as for the mag, the pics were taken right when I got it home. the seller had an ill fitting 228 floorplate on the mag and I didnt notice till I was able to examine it a lil closer. its already been rectified with an extra, proper 226 base plate.
September 20, 2019, 03:51 PM
Mustang-PaPaThe way i always understood sigs data base system is they have a new and old data base.
The old system is from 2005 and back and not all CS reps know of the older system or how to access it.
This was my understanding from 4-5 years ago.
It took me several phone calls over several months time to verify the year of build on an AL ni p229 that i was trying to determine if it was a GOTM build or not.
I finally got in touch with an old timer CS rep which explained it to me and was finally able to verify the year of build for me.
September 20, 2019, 04:00 PM
bolo4tomMustang, that makes a lot of sense now. Its frustrating trying to find info from them. some will help and dig a lil bit and some just act like they don't care, but perhaps it is, that some just don't know bout or how to access the older data?
September 20, 2019, 08:48 PM
andronicusMagnificent.
September 20, 2019, 09:32 PM
Excam_ManVicki verified it by phone.
September 20, 2019, 09:36 PM
PGTWhat was the first year of factory nickel 226's? I found a Tysons marked example today with mud-rails. Looked the same as the example I own with a proper factory marked box with it.