The Sig 225 A1 is a fine gun. Feels great in the hand. A natural pointer too.GREAT TRIGGER!!

PLEASE Sig, make this in a 6+1 or 7+1 45!!!

It would sell a boat load!! Anyone else want this? Regards 18DAI

They already do. It's called a P220.

Nah. The 220 is bigger and thicker. Never cared for the recoil pulse of the 220 either. Same for the 245. Too thick!

The 225 A1 is just right! Regards 18DAI

.45 doesnt fit the P225 frame. It must be made larger hence the P220.

quote:

Originally posted by 18DAI:
Nah. The 220 is bigger and thicker. Never cared for the recoil pulse of the 220 either. Same for the 245. Too thick!

The 225 A1 is just right! Regards 18DAI

Compare the dimensions of a .45 vs a 9mm (about .380") and you'll see why it needs to be a little thicker and longer (.07" x 8 rounds=.560").

This message has been edited. Last edited by: 220-9er,

I just want one with a DAK trigger installed. Anyone who has one care to pull the grips and see if it's compatible?

When are they coming out with the 10 rd. mags?

Well, what about a SP2022 in .45 cal then...would that work?

You won't get the short grip with a 7+1. TP45 or CT45 from Kahr as a guide. Pretty close to p225.

My want:
The 225A1 in .357 Sig. That would be a handful!

quote:

Originally posted by YooperSigs:
My want:
The 225A1 in .357 Sig. That would be a handful!

For that you would need the slide thickness of a 224 or 229c which is much thicker. The slide on those are thicker than an M11-A1 to accommodate the 40/357 round. I wish my 224 or 229c had a slimmer slide. That is why a barrel change is all you need to swap between the 224/229c 9mm and 40. Same slide for both.

How about the 220 carry?

I just wish they make a flush fitting 9 round mag. Even a plus 1 mag base for the 225 A1 would be nice

quote:

Originally posted by 18DAI:
Nah. The 220 is bigger and thicker. Never cared for the recoil pulse of the 220 either...

So, how are you expecting the recoil to be in a smaller and thinner gun?

quote:

Originally posted by dsiets:

quote:

Originally posted by 18DAI:
Nah. The 220 is bigger and thicker. Never cared for the recoil pulse of the 220 either...

So, how are you expecting the recoil to be in a smaller and thinner gun?

Magically lighter.

My 4513TSW AND CS45 both are lighter and smaller than any 220 model. Both are soft shooters. The dual recoil spring system of the 4513TSW provides that. Along with the delayed unlocking.

If S&W could do it, so could Sig. Regards 18DAI

How about a P245 for the win

quote:

Originally posted by CQB60:
How about a P245 for the win

I believe the OP nixed that in his second post.

quote:

Originally posted by 18DAI:
Nah. The 220 is bigger and thicker. Never cared for the recoil pulse of the 220 either. Same for the 245. Too thick.

Isn't the P225-A1 based on the P239 frame? If that is the case then .45ACP would be out of the question but .357 Sig might be possible.

Ok let's compromise...in .38 super then.

quote:

Originally posted by rpm2010:
Ok let's compromise...in .38 super then.

I think.38 Super is the same overall length as .45 ACP. It will also require a larger frame.

How about a Beretta 950 in .50GI with a rail and a bayonet lug? 8)

I think I'll just hang on to my Colt .45 LW Cmdr.