SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  SIG Pistols    Looking Hard at CDNN / 229 DAK
Page 1 2 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Looking Hard at CDNN / 229 DAK Login/Join 
Member
posted Hide Post
Awesome! You wont be disappointed. If you end up hating DAK, the parts to convert are still readily available, and its an easy project. I think the more you shoot it the more you will appreciate it.

Congrats, and let me know on that short reach trigger.
 
Posts: 553 | Location: Ohio | Registered: April 13, 2012Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
I have a P229 Elite Classic Carry in 9mm and would like to get one of the P229 .40 DAK's then get a replacement barrel in 357 sig.
 
Posts: 10 | Registered: June 04, 2018Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Congrats on the purchase. Hopefully you have another P-series that looks similar so that if your wife asks you can just act like you've had it for a long while.
 
Posts: 388 | Registered: March 30, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Road Dog
Picture of BennerP220
posted Hide Post
Congrats! Let us know how you like the DAK if you will.
 
Posts: 3479 | Location: Southwest Indiana | Registered: December 12, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Not One of
the Cool Kids
Picture of enidpd804
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Cous2492:
Awesome! You wont be disappointed. If you end up hating DAK, the parts to convert are still readily available, and its an easy project. I think the more you shoot it the more you will appreciate it.

Congrats, and let me know on that short reach trigger.


I've got very long fingers, so I might be okay. I'll definitely keep that in mind, though. Again, that was very cool of you.
 
Posts: 3911 | Location: OK | Registered: August 15, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
I've always kinda wanted one of these in 357. Be like a 12 shot 357 Magnum revolver Cool
 
Posts: 491 | Registered: February 01, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Prepared for the Worst, Providing the Best
Picture of 92fstech
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by enidpd804:
I went back and forth. I just ordered the DAK. It was less than $398 delivered and a $15 transfer. It's just silly not to. That's what I need you guys to say if my wife asks.


Big Grin. Attaboy! My brother was just asking me the other night about picking up a P229 in .40 so I sent him a link to the CDNN ones. Not sure if he'll get one one or not, but it's an awesome deal. I'd scoop one up if I didn't already have one.
 
Posts: 9460 | Location: In the Cornfields | Registered: May 25, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Not One of
the Cool Kids
Picture of enidpd804
posted Hide Post
So far, that seems well worth four bills. I shot 50 rounds of HST, 50 rounds of Lawman and a few magazines of my really weak lead reloads. There really is something special about any P22x pistols. One thing I don't love is the stocks. I'm shoot with my right side thumb up since my surgery and the left stock protrusion at the top is painful. Any suggestions? Taking the stock off, it doesn't look like that really needs to be there. I'm looking at Hogue right now.



[url=https://postimg.cc/Z0fBh5pb]

This message has been edited. Last edited by: enidpd804,
 
Posts: 3911 | Location: OK | Registered: August 15, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Glad you like it! Looks to be in good shape, too. I have a well used set of Hogue rubber grips you can have if you want them, and a set of E2 grips I would trade for your two-piece grips if you were interested.


Let me know.
 
Posts: 553 | Location: Ohio | Registered: April 13, 2012Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Not One of
the Cool Kids
Picture of enidpd804
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Cous2492:
Glad you like it! Looks to be in good shape, too. I have a well used set of Hogue rubber grips you can have if you want them, and a set of E2 grips I would trade for your two-piece grips if you were interested.


Let me know.


I’d be down for a trade. Email in profile?
 
Posts: 3911 | Location: OK | Registered: August 15, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Looks great, very good shape. Rails look good.


DPR
 
Posts: 663 | Registered: March 10, 2015Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Not One of
the Cool Kids
Picture of enidpd804
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by 10round:
Looks great, very good shape. Rails look good.


The barrel hood was even pristine. Was.
 
Posts: 3911 | Location: OK | Registered: August 15, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Freethinker
Picture of sigfreund
posted Hide Post
That protrusion at the top of the left grip plate is something I believe I have never seen before. I’m curious if the plate could be used with a decocking lever, i.e., is there a gap under the plate that would allow a lever to be installed, or does that part of the grip plate contact the frame?

The first photo below of the DAK “slim” grip plate shows what I’m referring to. The shape of the grip plate as is clear in the second photo makes it appear as if it’s designed for use with a decocker, but there is no room under the plate to permit the decocker to be installed.








This shows the “slim” DAK grip plates in comparison with the normal plates that are compatible with the DA/SA decocker. The latter has a protrusion at the top left to permit using the decocker, but it doesn’t seem to be the same size and shape as the one on your gun.






6.4/93.6
___________
“We are Americans …. Together we have resisted the trap of appeasement, cynicism, and isolation that gives temptation to tyrants.”
— George H. W. Bush
 
Posts: 47854 | Location: 10,150 Feet Above Sea Level in Colorado | Registered: April 04, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Not One of
the Cool Kids
Picture of enidpd804
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by sigfreund:
That protrusion at the top of the left grip plate is something I believe I have never seen before. I’m curious if the plate could be used with a decocking lever, i.e., is there a gap under the plate that would allow a lever to be installed, or does that part of the grip plate contact the frame?

The first photo below of the DAK “slim” grip plate shows what I’m referring to. The shape of the grip plate as is clear in the second photo makes it appear as if it’s designed for use with a decocker, but there is no room under the plate to permit the decocker to be installed.








This shows the “slim” DAK grip plates in comparison with the normal plates that are compatible with the DA/SA decocker. The latter has a protrusion at the top left to permit using the decocker, but it doesn’t seem to be the same size and shape as the one on your gun.




It looks like it was meant for a decocker but my 226 doesn’t have that protrusion and it is DA/SA. I looked online but I haven't found any DAK slim grips available. Mr. Cous2492 has graciously offered to trade me his E2 grip. Still, if anyone has a source, I wouldn't mind picking another set up. I might find myself picking up another variation from Sherrdeee ern ern.
 
Posts: 3911 | Location: OK | Registered: August 15, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Cous2492:
Do it. Do it now. I purchased a P229r in .40 with a DAK trigger and it is one of my favorite pistols. Admittedly, I am a little slower with DAK (also have a p239 and P224 in DAK), but the trigger pull is smooth and noticeably lighter than standard DA/SA Sigs. Kind of Kahrish. I think with a little practice, I could (maybe) catch up with my other guns as far as speed goes.


Also, the .40 is a fine round. I was on the 9mm wagon and realized that .40 was not the dog it was being sold as by the FBI. I was relieved to find out that the LE agency I work for will NOT be switching to 9mm polymer guns like the rest of the crowd.... not that there is anything wrong with them. Our armorers, who are very good, tested several ammunition brands and bullet designs and found that our Federal HST 180gr bullets out performed the 9mm versions in testing held at our range with factory reps present. We are upgrading from non railed P226 in .40 to the railed version with SRT kits installed. Officers will have a choice between E2 and standard grips and short reach or standard triggers. I'm personally excited about the small change.


My Agency issued the 229R DAK .40 from 2005 to 2019. And two other .40s before that.

DAK works and 40 works but works does not equal optimal.

I’d prefer a DA/SA but there is no free lunch and DA/SA takes a bit more work to shoot well. The problem is training time is always in short supply.

9mm is not replacing .40 because 40 doesn’t work. 9 just does the same thing with less recoil and more rounds. Less recoil = shooting faster. In a fight, bullets are opportunities, more is better.

That said if my choices were a DAK 9mm or a DA/SA .40 I would take the 40. The DAK just sucks the joy out of shooting a SIG.

I would also advise conducting some objective testing before going to the E2 grips. They feel good but feelings lie and our people’s performance was better with the standard grips. The E2s also lose texture and get “slick” very quickly when carried and rubbing against things.
 
Posts: 528 | Location: Texas | Registered: March 25, 2013Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  SIG Pistols    Looking Hard at CDNN / 229 DAK

© SIGforum 2024