Took my Sig 320 and my Wilson EDC 9 ( 15 rounder) to the range today. I shot my Sig as well as the Wilson, although the 1911 trigger had a shorter reset and lighter pull. I let a fellow next to me shoot both. He preferred the trigger on the Sig. I read Gun Tests and they preferred the trigger on the Glock 45 as opposed to the trigger on a Sig 320 carry which they said was 6 1/2lbs. I have three Sig 320s and the triggers on them beat the heck out of the new Glock 45. What is your take on the triggers?

Overall, the P320 is juts a plain natural shooter. You don't have to work very hard for good results. A large part of that is the trigger.

A good trigger doesn't have to be super light and/or super crisp. As a matter of fact, I tweaked the 3 1/2 lb trigger on my Wilson .45 up to 4 lbs. It was too light for me. Shot it better after the tweak.

Others have reported the same results with the P320. It's an easy shooter.

My only complaint with 320 triggers is that they "roll" my finger during recoil. I put a flat GG trigger in the worst offender - a .45 Compact- and end of problem.
And my 320 triggers are better than any Glock I own.

The 320 trigger in general is just better IMO.

I have a lot of time on Glock triggers, and I still prefer the 320 trigger over them.

My current duty pistols are the G45 and the X Carry.


TXPO