SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  SIG Pistols    Got back into a PX4 today
Page 1 2 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Got back into a PX4 today Login/Join 
Member
posted Hide Post
I put the Optimized Trigger Bar on all my 92's and PX4's when they first came out and paid $30 each. Just looked at the LTT site and they are substantially more, great product though.
 
Posts: 1213 | Location: Central Ohio | Registered: January 05, 2018Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of SevenPlusOne
posted Hide Post
Mine shot to the right, I didn't try any different ammo. Sold it to a friend for his wife.
I have a Cougar .45 that I really like.



"Ninja kick the damn rabbit"
 
Posts: 4713 | Location: Oklahoma | Registered: October 11, 2008Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of CQB60
posted Hide Post
I’m a fan of the PX4. I’ve had a Langdon compact carry for awhile and picked up a full size SD model last year. They are flat shooting pistols. I’d recommend the LTT mods if you keep yours.


______________________________________________
Life is short. It’s shorter with the wrong gun…
 
Posts: 13983 | Location: VIrtual | Registered: November 13, 2009Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of dcowboyscr
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Genorogers:
I put the Optimized Trigger Bar on all my 92's and PX4's when they first came out and paid $30 each. Just looked at the LTT site and they are substantially more, great product though.


Are you sure you're thinking about the LTT Optimized trigger bar? They've never sold at $30.


"Clear Eyes. Full Hearts. Can't Lose."
 
Posts: 3113 | Location: Indianapolis, Indiana, USA | Registered: September 04, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Experienced Slacker
posted Hide Post
My desire for a gun I didn't mind pointed at my junk, while in a holster, led me to a PX4 about a year ago.
Only complaint was its bulk, everything else was ideal. Now I've sided with an HK CC9 for apendix carry since it ticks all the boxes just a tad better.

A sub compact PX4 would scratch that old BSG 2005 itch for me though. Cool
 
Posts: 7792 | Registered: May 12, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
E tan e epi tas
Picture of cslinger
posted Hide Post
quote:
Now I've sided with an HK CC9 for apendix carry since it ticks all the boxes just a tad better.


The CC9, while a good little gun to be sure, is still a striker pointed at “big Jim and the twins” so did you just move past that trepidation? This is purely curiosity on my part as I don’t carry appendix and while I will carry strikers still prefer hammer in general.


Take Care, Shoot Safe,
Chris
 
Posts: 8643 | Location: On the water | Registered: July 25, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Glad slinger asked that. I don’t get the differentiation either. Hammer gun sure. Striker with no manual safety? No thanks. Only way I appendix with striker is with a manual safety.
 
Posts: 8479 | Location: Florida | Registered: June 18, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by dcowboyscr:
quote:
Originally posted by Genorogers:
I put the Optimized Trigger Bar on all my 92's and PX4's when they first came out and paid $30 each. Just looked at the LTT site and they are substantially more, great product though.


Are you sure you're thinking about the LTT Optimized trigger bar? They've never sold at $30.

You are correct and I mis-spoked. I paid $63 when they were introduced in 2019.
 
Posts: 1213 | Location: Central Ohio | Registered: January 05, 2018Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Prepared for the Worst, Providing the Best
Picture of 92fstech
posted Hide Post
I also share Chris and Pedro's curiosity about what makes the CC9 acceptable for junk pointing while other striker platforms are not. I did finally get to handle one of those a couple of weeks ago...nice little guns, just too small for my big hands.


-----------------------------------------------------------

Any comments made by this poster are my own and do not reflect the views or opinions of my employer.
 
Posts: 11813 | Location: In the Cornfields | Registered: May 25, 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Experienced Slacker
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by cslinger:
quote:
Now I've sided with an HK CC9 for apendix carry since it ticks all the boxes just a tad better.


The CC9, while a good little gun to be sure, is still a striker pointed at “big Jim and the twins” so did you just move past that trepidation? This is purely curiosity on my part as I don’t carry appendix and while I will carry strikers still prefer hammer in general.


Good catch. Thing is I shoot strikers well but I don't trust the P320 sub-compact I have (enough to carry aiwb). Of course it seemed like a good choice at the time. Among the other strikers I've used or thought about, the CC9 seemed the most bred for the task and least likely to mutiny.

Really do like shooting the PX4 though, and while it will remain an option for sure, it's just so much more bulky and heavy once I try to hide it.

This message has been edited. Last edited by: apprentice,
 
Posts: 7792 | Registered: May 12, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  SIG Pistols    Got back into a PX4 today

© SIGforum 2026