SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  SIG Pistols    Contemplating going Red Dot on a pistol
Page 1 2 3 4 
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Contemplating going Red Dot on a pistol Login/Join 
Sigforum K9 handler
Picture of jljones
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Voshterkoff:
I assume you mostly carry concealed, or with a Safariland with optic guard? My other question is how snow interferes with it.


Correct. I carry it most of the time concealed. When I don’t, it’s in a safariland with a cover. I’ve not had much experience shooting it in heavy snow where it may cause issue. Where I live, that’s a twice per year problem.

RMR’s may not be perfect and they may not fit everyone’s needs. I fully admit it. But, I won’t ever be without one. I haven’t seen an issue that could make me want to go back to irons.




www.opspectraining.com

"It's a bold strategy, Cotton. Let's see if it works out for them"



 
Posts: 37117 | Location: Logical | Registered: September 12, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Excellent. Thank you, JLJ, for both replies. This is kind of feedback I need to hear.

And yes, your advanced course sounds awesome. I'm assuming Pat McNamara is teaching it, then.


________________
tempus edax rerum
 
Posts: 1251 | Location: Oregon | Registered: March 18, 2014Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Sigforum K9 handler
Picture of jljones
posted Hide Post
Lol, not Pat Mac. Just an Academy class.




www.opspectraining.com

"It's a bold strategy, Cotton. Let's see if it works out for them"



 
Posts: 37117 | Location: Logical | Registered: September 12, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Catalina
posted Hide Post
I think the jury is out on this red dot value question, no?

Unless you are a bullseye master expertly lining up that front post between those two white dots, the threat focus red dot aiming method is crazy easier to grasp and master.

The endless variations, "improvements", radioactive tubes, different colors, trapezoids, etc etc in iron sights can just stop and be relegated to the dustbin of history.

Give me a CR2032 battery, a sealing plate, and black suppressor sights and let's go!!


Go Glock - until you can afford H&K (or Sig!)
 
Posts: 246 | Location: O-H ! ___________ I-O ! | Registered: February 10, 2005Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Catalina:
...

Give me a CR2032 battery, a sealing plate, and black suppressor sights and let's go!!


You bring up a question I was needing answered, sir.

The question of the Sealing Plate. Should I get one for my P320 Carry and P365 cuts? I've read both sides in the endless Googling.

I don't PLAN on going over-the-beach with my RMR, but I guess if the mill isn't perfectly smooth then I need to get a sealing plate, yes?


________________
tempus edax rerum
 
Posts: 1251 | Location: Oregon | Registered: March 18, 2014Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Sigforum K9 handler
Picture of jljones
posted Hide Post
What does it hurt? It’s a $9 item. Don’t know if it really makes a difference for my uses, but I’ll use it for $9 or whatever it costs.




www.opspectraining.com

"It's a bold strategy, Cotton. Let's see if it works out for them"



 
Posts: 37117 | Location: Logical | Registered: September 12, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Delta-3
posted Hide Post
quote:
RMR’s may not be perfect and they may not fit everyone’s needs. I fully admit it. But, I won’t ever be without one. I haven’t seen an issue that could make me want to go back to irons.


I concur whole heartily.


Rom 13:4 If you do evil, be afraid. For he does not bear the sword in vain. For he is God's minister, an avenger to execute wrath on him who practices evil.
 
Posts: 706 | Location: NW Ohio but Montana is always home. | Registered: September 30, 2012Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Blume9mm
posted Hide Post
I will readily admit that a red dot on a pistol is inherently more accurate and once you master acquiring the dot fast is just plane simply the best way to shoot.... with that said I still fall back on "never trust your life solely to electronics.

Last time I went to Front Sight I spent three days training with a Sig P320 compact with the factory Romeo sight.... it actually got pretty boring never missing and just drilling hole after hole. Then on the day of the qualification test I pull the pistol out and no dot.... luckily I was smart enough to have spare batteries with me. Not sure any bad guys would have been willing to accommodate me changing batteries.

As for a defensive weapon in close quarters, which is the most likely situation... well hell you are probably not going to be using sights of any type.


My Native American Name:
"Runs with Scissors"
 
Posts: 4441 | Location: Greenville, SC | Registered: January 30, 2017Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Ranger41
posted Hide Post
Regarding sealing plates -

Recently picked up a 365XL and added a Romeo Zero. The Romeo Zero came with the sealing plate, but no mention of it was found in the instructions. A google search brought up one interesting perspective on why it was necessary.

Disclaimer: This is internet lore and may be incorrect. The reason for the sealing plate is to provide electrical insulation between the Romeo Zero's battery and the slide. Without it battery life can be significantly shortened.


"The world is too dangerous to live in-not because of the people who do evil, but because of the people who sit and let it happen." (Albert Einstein)
 
Posts: 957 | Location: Rural Virginia - USA | Registered: May 14, 2002Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Sigforum K9 handler
Picture of jljones
posted Hide Post
The thing this thread has reenforced to me- Never train at Front Sight.




www.opspectraining.com

"It's a bold strategy, Cotton. Let's see if it works out for them"



 
Posts: 37117 | Location: Logical | Registered: September 12, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
I Deal In Lead
Picture of Flash-LB
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Blume9mm:
Then on the day of the qualification test I pull the pistol out and no dot.... luckily I was smart enough to have spare batteries with me. Not sure any bad guys would have been willing to accommodate me changing batteries.

As for a defensive weapon in close quarters, which is the most likely situation... well hell you are probably not going to be using sights of any type.


And that's probably the biggest problem with using a Red Dot for EDC. You can probably think you can get around it by changing batteries long before they'd be discharged, but what if you get a defective battery and it only works for a day or so? What then? And I've had a number of factory defective batteries over the years I've been on the planet. Some of them worked for very short periods of time.
 
Posts: 10626 | Location: Gilbert Arizona | Registered: March 21, 2013Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
A couple of points on the above. At least on an RMR the purpose of the 'sealing' plate is (wait for it) sealing when there is not a place for the oring to seat/seal. https://www.trijicon.com/frequ...uestions/most-viewed
It doesn't hurt using one if its not needed.
I simply cannot imagine anyone would not have backup irons on an EDC gun. SO a battery failure literally means you are doing what you would have done anyway. And at modest distances I find centering in the RMR window generates pretty good accuracy even without the dot available. There are certainly some circumstances where the dot on the gun makes the irons less or even not useful, but the ones of those I know about I take pains to avoid.


“So in war, the way is to avoid what is strong, and strike at what is weak.”
 
Posts: 11004 | Registered: October 14, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
Thanks all.

1) Yes, backup irons will be present on my red-dot'd pistols.

2) The sealing plate Trijicon sells for their RMRs are made of stainless steel, much like the SIG slide, so the idea they're for some sort of electrical insulation for the sake of battery life doesn't seem to jive.

3) All these pro/con arguments seem to be reminiscent of the "red dots on rifle" threads of old.


________________
tempus edax rerum
 
Posts: 1251 | Location: Oregon | Registered: March 18, 2014Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
During my match yesterday the dot was turning into a blob in recoil. Sharp when centered, blob in recoil. No amount of lens cleaning worked. When I got home , I cleaned emitter thoroughly and it seemed to work. Headed to the range now to verify.

No huge drama. Still finished 75% of overall match winner but it was unnecessarily distracting and just suboptimal. Reinforced my plan to cut down my open emitter optics to a bare minimum.
 
Posts: 481 | Registered: April 03, 2014Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
what optic?


“So in war, the way is to avoid what is strong, and strike at what is weak.”
 
Posts: 11004 | Registered: October 14, 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
The SRO.
 
Posts: 481 | Registered: April 03, 2014Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of Blume9mm
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by jljones:
The thing this thread has reenforced to me- Never train at Front Sight.


At front sight it is all about drilling in drawing from concealed and putting the sights on the target and firing two rounds.

What I learned latter when I took a force on force class twice at the Sig Acadamy was in most of the situations they put you in there was no time to use the sights... when a guy bust in a room and and is about 10 feet away and shooting people you don't have the time to use them.... in fact in one the only reason I used the sights on the P226 I was issued was the knife wielding perp I had shot and he was down but still holding the knife just below his chest and a threat and I did not want to shoot him in the hand. I had been shot in the hand in a previous class and was still bleeding.


My Native American Name:
"Runs with Scissors"
 
Posts: 4441 | Location: Greenville, SC | Registered: January 30, 2017Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by YVK:
The SRO.


Sorry to hear that. Please post back when you get it sorted out. First I've heard of such an oddity.


________________
tempus edax rerum
 
Posts: 1251 | Location: Oregon | Registered: March 18, 2014Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by dehughes:
quote:
Originally posted by YVK:
The SRO.


Sorry to hear that. Please post back when you get it sorted out. First I've heard of such an oddity.


It is sorted out. I probably should start bringing Q-tips to the matches, along with a lens pen, cloth, and lens cleaner that I already have in my bag. Cleaning the emitter window took care of that weird sector of blur.

Projection issues are quite common, they just range in their magnitude. Stuff on the window, on the emitter, etc. Shooting against low lying sun is something that can bring out blobs and distorted dots very easily.
 
Posts: 481 | Registered: April 03, 2014Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Member
Picture of RichardC
posted Hide Post
Two IDPA matches ago, the sun was right over the back of the berm on my first stage.

There were TWO identical red dots
in my SRO.
Some kind of reflection, or my astigmatism, I guess. I lost a little time and dropped several shots into the -1's.

I can 't claim that same lighting situation hasn't cost me when shooting irons with a gold bead front sight.

(It's great excuse number 25b.) Razz


____________________

Blessed be the Lord, my Rock
 
Posts: 15898 | Location: Florida | Registered: June 23, 2003Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata Page 1 2 3 4  
 

SIGforum.com    Main Page  Hop To Forum Categories  SIG Pistols    Contemplating going Red Dot on a pistol

© SIGforum 2024