Member
| Just a little love for the 22/45 version of the MKII. there's not a lot that needs to be done to it. One of my favorites. |
| |
semi-reformed sailor
| ^^ that’s one of the first version of the 22/45. I have one of the newer ones with the removable grips
"Violence, naked force, has settled more issues in history than has any other factor.” Robert A. Heinlein
“You may beat me, but you will never win.” sigmonkey-2020
“A single round of buckshot to the torso almost always results in an immediate change of behavior.” Chris Baker |
| Posts: 11529 | Location: Temple, Texas! | Registered: October 07, 2006 |
IP
|
|
Member
| quote: Originally posted by jhe888: I have a MkII with a bull barrel, but that target barrel is more elegant.
I have both. I agree with you, and feel that the tapered barrel balances better as is more fun to shoot as well, though ALL Mk IIs are great shooters imho. I belive MK IIs are the best generation of that gun. Reassembly is just part of the fun with these great guns.
Lover of the US Constitution Wile E. Coyote School of DIY Disaster |
| Posts: 9012 | Location: Nowhere the constitution is not honored | Registered: February 01, 2008 |
IP
|
|
Member
| quote: Originally posted by Brian87: Try finding mark II 22/45 magazines….no one has any. I almost bought a 22/45 mk II stainless with one magazine, but first checked out who is selling extra mags…couldn’t find any, nada, not even on EBay. Wirthwein Guns offers a Ruger manufactured magazine base block to adapt standard 90231 mags to Mark 2 22/45 configuration. https://store.wirthweinguns.co...bse-2245-mk2-mk3.htm |
| Posts: 3595 | Location: Western PA | Registered: July 20, 2010 |
IP
|
|
Member
| MKIII 22/45 will work in MKII. |
| |
Member
| I love these, the only thing I dislike is putting putting these back together. |
| |
Member
| quote: Originally posted by Marlin Fan: I love these, the only thing I dislike is putting putting these back together.
After reassembling a MkIII for the first time at work so time ago, that pain was the one thing that put me off from buying a Ruger Mk. That experience convinced me that I was quite content with my Buck Mark, thankyouverymuch. It wasn't until the MkIVs came along that I finally ran out of excuses and ultimately bought a Ruger, a 22/45 Lite. It's been a nice shooter along with its stablemate, the Wrangler.
-MG
|
| Posts: 2268 | Location: The commie, rainy side of WA | Registered: April 19, 2020 |
IP
|
|
Prepared for the Worst, Providing the Best
| quote: Originally posted by SIGfourme: 92fstech--TandemKross has their 22/45 lower on sale for $100 off. New lower creates an entire new pistol. Cyber Monday deal that has me thinking. Kracken is TandemKross's race gun for the Ruger MK 4.....
Do you have a link? I'm seeing it, but it's not showing discounted...looks like the standard list price of $599. I did get my "blast pack" in this weekend and installed it in my MkIV. It took the trigger from 3lb 15oz to 3lb 1oz, and eliminated all the grit and stacking. It's still not as good as my MkII that measures right around 2lb, but it's a significant improvement over factory, and gets rid of the stupid magazine safety. My son and I put about 250 rounds through it last night and it ran pretty well...a couple of stovepipes and it short stroked/failed to strip a round off the mag a couple of times. It was always the second round of a fully-loaded mag, so I imagine it has something to do with the pressure that the mag spring is exerting against the bottom of the bolt when it cycles. Should be pretty easy to address. Zero light strikes, which is awesome as that was my biggest concern with the lighter hammer. Overall I feel like the kit was a good value, but the trigger on my factory MkII makes it clear that there's still some room for improvement. Kinda leaves me wanting to try the Volquartsen Kit and compare the two...maybe I do need that extra lower lol. |
| Posts: 9471 | Location: In the Cornfields | Registered: May 25, 2006 |
IP
|
|